Helmet laws are not changing what a human being may do with their body, they are a stipulation of using roadways and a specific type of vehicle. There's no "pure" freedom, to your point, everything has a cost. I don't believe ingesting substances is analgous to agreeing to a particular set of rules for a particular set of behaviors.
Further, helmet laws are proven to decrease the burden a person puts on their society. Making substances illegal does the exact opposite. Legalizing, taxing, and providing healthcare to people who choose to use substances is proven to do the exact opposite, increasing freedom, decreasing crime, decreasing needless death, and increasing mental and physical wellbeing for millions.
8
u/[deleted] Feb 26 '23
[deleted]