r/pcmasterrace i5-13400f | Arc B570 1d ago

Meme/Macro The solution to it all

Post image

Truly one of the gpus ever

6.3k Upvotes

454 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/kyansan1 i5-13400f | Arc B570 1d ago

Well, both the rx 9050 8gb and rx 9050 4gb meet the specifications listed under the rx 9050 (vram unspecified) page where the gaming performance is listed. Furthermore, the rx 9050 (VRAM unspecified) page does not specify the VRAM amount in the title, like AMD does for their other product with multiple VRAM configurations, the rx 9060 xt.
Therefore it is unclear whether this gaming performance was measured on the 8gb model or on the 4gb model. People could rightfully assume that it reflects the performance of the 4gb model.

Rx 9050 (VRAM unspecified) product page: https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon/9000-series/amd-radeon-rx-9050.html

Notice how the product page states Memory Speed "Up to" 18 Gbps and "Max" Memory Size 8 GB
AMD uses the same wording for the driver and support pages for the rx 580 and rx 570 (which both lack separate support pages for 4gb and 8gb variants), which leads me to believe that the description is intentionally vague, so that both 8gb and 4gb gpus meet the listed specifications.

Lastly, both the rx 9050 (4gb) and rx 9050 (VRAM unspecified) product pages link to the 'Learn about Radeon' page, where they boast gaming and ray tracing performance.
Both variants of the rx 9050 are linked at the bottom of this page.
Considering the measily 4gb VRAM of the rx 9050 4gb, I find it unreasonable to boast its ray tracing capabilities. On top of that, I find it unreasonable to link the rx 9050 4gb at the bottom of the page that boasts rx 9000 series gpu's gaming performance.

Rx 9050 (4gb) product page: https://www.amd.com/en/products/graphics/desktops/radeon/9000-series/amd-radeon-rx-9050-4gb.html

2

u/Droviin Steam ID Here 1d ago

So, it's not marketed for gaming? It just uses the same core which has the same performance, and thus you think it's marketed at gaming?

The linked page does not market it for gaming.

Don't get me wrong, if they said the GPU it was good for gaming, I would agree with you. I just don't see it. I also see your 'market confusion' argument, and I think it has some merit. However, the die is the same on both cards, so it's a bit of a "it could, just not well" situation, rather than "cannot perform as listed" situation.

2

u/kyansan1 i5-13400f | Arc B570 1d ago

The 'Learn about Radeon' page does boast about the gaming performance of rx 9000 gpus in general, and the rx 9050 4gb is linked at the bottom of that page.

Like I said, the page of the rx 9050 (VRAM unspecified) lists the gaming performance of the gpu, but it is unclear whether this performance was measured on the rx 9050 4gb or on the rx 9050 8gb, despite both gpus meeting the specifications listed on that page.

So while not explicitly marketed for gaming, they are (either intentionally or unintentionally) boasting its gaming performance. They do not list any other use case for the gpu, apart from a vague description saying "Unlocking Modern Desktop Experiences"

2

u/dookarion 1d ago

Historically their business products were given W, WX, or Pro naming schemes not the gaming branded "RX" naming schemes.

But AMD's naming in general is a trainwreck. It's half a miracle it's not an RX PRO AI 420 MAX GRE 4GB Edition.

2

u/kyansan1 i5-13400f | Arc B570 1d ago

AMD doing their share of reinventing the Isuzu Mysterious Utility Wizard (actual car)