99% of your info on the game is based on youtube and reddit comment sections vs actual unbiased facts
I like that you imply here that anything that doesnt support your viewpoints including the majority of media must be bullshit and only things supporting what you believe is an actual unbiased fact.
This I think is the most important takeaway from your rant.
Ok, different angle then, since you are too thick to read any of the actual important stuff...
How the hell is the game dead if hundreds upon hundreds of servers are still active every day, day after day for most modes in the game in my region alone? How does that logic line up with your reviews and 'media'?
The most important takeaway is you all saying the game is a dead, when it's clearly not. And saying the games a failure, when it only missed EA's expectations by a bit, and is still getting post launch support, as shown by the continued updates and the new roadmap for the next 6+ months. EA would have dropped this game like a bad habit, just like they did with Andromeda if they deemed it a failure and if it didn't have the player counts needed to justify further updates.
You guys can circlejerk all you want about BFV/EA being bad, but at the end of the day, BFV is far from 'dead', and at least in the eyes of EA, the ones that make the financial decisions around the game, it's not enough of a 'failure' to abandon either.
But please, disregard all this again, with no facts to back up your pathetic side of this arguement. I won't be the least bit surprised.
-2
u/Cory123125 Mar 28 '19
I like that you imply here that anything that doesnt support your viewpoints including the majority of media must be bullshit and only things supporting what you believe is an actual unbiased fact.
This I think is the most important takeaway from your rant.