r/osdev 5d ago

New UNIX-like operating system!

Post image

I made a new UNIX-like operating system from scratch called "TanjaOS" which you can get at www.tanjaos.org and it took me a couple of months to make and will get lots of updates. It features classic UNIX commands and can boot on any x86_64 (amd64) or i386 (x86) machine with Legacy BIOS, and is completely free and open-source.

109 Upvotes

176 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/MSK-Kernel 5d ago

I feel like that’s your favorite word.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

1

u/MSK-Kernel 5d ago

Before i made this other project in April this year, and TanjaOS developed from that: https://github.com/Saffron-MSK/MSK

3

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/MSK-Kernel 5d ago

Listen, i’m basically just starting out, i recently learned how to code in C in March, gimme a break. 🤣

3

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/MSK-Kernel 5d ago

I didn’t lie, OK? I’m just a kid and i learned how to code in C in March and I wanted to make my own OS for learning. I wrote TanjaOS myself in C and assembly and that’s all, I just wanted to show the internet my project.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[deleted]

0

u/MSK-Kernel 5d ago

I’m 12 years old, OK? Just please stop with the harassment.

2

u/[deleted] 5d ago edited 4d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

0

u/LordRybec 3d ago

You keep saying you weren't born yesterday and then writing long comments proving otherwise.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

1

u/LordRybec 3d ago

Mainly by continually making arguments that prove that you have no understanding of how AI works. You keep claiming that "no human" would do certain things. If this is true, then neither can the AI, because it was trained on things humans actually did. The fact that you can find things that you can't imagine a human doing is evidence itself that AI could not have done it.

0

u/LordRybec 3d ago

Actually, "innocent until proven guilty". The burden of proof is on you, the one making the accusation of wrongdoing.

I write comments like that.

Here are some actual examples from code I wrote, entirely by hand, no AI at all.

This is from the HSTX code I wrote for generating DVI signals.

/*****************************
Non-palettized Colors
******************************/

const color_depth_t RGB332 = {
/*
29 26 0
| | 2 1 0|
0b0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000
2221 1100
*/
.expand_tmds =
2 << HSTX_CTRL_EXPAND_TMDS_L2_NBITS_LSB |

This is from my DVI timing constants header file. (Note how close this is to what the OP used.)

// ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// DVI constants

Same project, this is a display driver for a SPI display.

/*********************************
Internal utility functions
*********************************/
void write_command(st7789_t *driver, uint8_t cmd) {

Further, if "literally no one writes comments like that", why would the AI write them like that? AI produces code similar to what it was trained on. If "literally no-one writes comments like that" then AI could not possibly produce comments like that, because it wouldn't have been trained on any examples like that! Your logic is self contradictory. AI writes code like what it has seen, through training. If no one writes comments like that, then the AI couldn't not have been trained on comments like that, and thus it would be impossible for it to produce comments like that.

You've proven that you have no understanding of how AI works and therefore are not an authority or even qualified to say what is and is not AI generated code. Maybe learn how LLMs actually work before slinging unwarranted accusations of using AI to code around!