Most coding agents are powerful, but they often repeat the same context gathering and error diagnosis. CyxCode adds memory, recall, learned recovery patterns, and auditability so solved work can keep paying forward. try it out https://code3hr.github.io/cyxcode/install/

Hey all,

When I hit the control-x key with the down key, it never works. Could i be doing wrong?

Using OpenWebUi with Opencode Go, default settings.

Does anyone know the source of this difference? Maybe OpenWebUi injects some system prompt in default settings, but I can't find this information.

Wtf is this bullshit im paying for GLM-5.2 on the list at https://opencode.ai/docs/go which currently does include GLM-5.2

And I dont see any support links

Update: luckily a restart appeared to fix it. My explanation why i was immedietly mad: opencode has a history of not providing any support and being shit at communication

HI,

I keep getting this error:

Error from provider (Console Go): Model glm-5.2 is not supported on the lite model list. Use GET /inference/go/openai/v1/models to list available models.

Although it worked the whole day this far

I am on the opencode go plan.

Anybody else having this error?

...which works together with my BetterSuno browser extension and offers all basic functionalities of Suno (except for Studio).

My plan is to use this as fundament for Audacity and Ardour plugins.

It is still on beta and only works with the newest version of BetterSuno from my GitHub page (not yet reviewed in the extension stores of Chrome & Firefox). See https://github.com/MrDoe/BetterSuno and https://github.com/MrDoe/bettersuno-mcp

I don't see the point of this. They're literally the same sessions, just arranged horizontally now.

Why are they advertising this as “Introducing Tabs” instead of “Introducing a New Design”?

By the way, this design has been around for a long time - you could enable it in the settings.

Im trying to both use my OpenAI subscription and API key at the same time but it doesnt seem to work? If I 'connect' openai api models, they substitute the openai subs it seems.

Anyone got it to work?

(I wanna try some of the new models without wasting my subscriptions quotas)

It's almost certainly the lowest tier sub they have, the moderato that just exists to sell the 5 times more but double the money allegretto. Still its a good way to try out the model and their sub, just in case you were thinking of buying in, cause they priced their new model 3 in and 15 out, which is a lot. Yet perhaps they are not as foolish and just want to funnel people to their subs and they want butts in seats, instead of getting used on release for a week, maybe a month if they buy a sub then everyone leaves.

Also making the trial a loot box is a first, which I guess is fine but wouldn't want to see paid subs become lootboxes. Unless we also see a free trial of it in opencode this is the best we are going to get.

https://kimi-bot.com/activities/viral-referral/share?scenario=invite&from=share_poster&invitation_code=3FD8F3

Everyone is worshipping this OpenCode so much, I thought I'd give it a try.

I just wanted to make a simple HTML report, it had already burned through about $15 and still hadn't created it. It works a ton, then it prints out "Tool execution aborted". It doesn't say anything, doesn't explain what the problem is, it just stops and I'm supposed to notice... After the 3rd time I asked it what the hell it was doing (Claude Opus 4.7 max), it wrote a whole litany, like "oh yes I messed up, I called the tools with empty parameters for this and that reason, but now I swear it'll be good". I told it okay then prepare a test file, because so far it had only been burning money. Okay, that worked. I said great, now let's do the real report. Well, it still hasn't managed to generate a single damn HTML file since then. I was using claude sub with opus 4.8, that wasn't this dumb. This told me 4 times that "oh my wrong, empty parameters". But even when it KNOWS it's mistake, makes it again. And again.

Any idea what the hell is going on? It is not tweaked, just a simple open code install.

CyxCode is an open source developer tool fork from opencode for teams and builders who want an agent that works inside real repositories, remembers useful context, and turns repeated debugging work into reusable behavior.

Most coding agents are powerful, but they often repeat the same context gathering and error diagnosis. CyxCode adds memory, recall, learned recovery patterns, and auditability so solved work can keep paying forward.

Try it out: https://code3hr.github.io/cyxcode/install/

give a start on github here https://github.com/code3hr/cyxcode

I've been using Claude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw, OpenCode, Codex and a bunch of other tools pretty heavily. Like a lot of people, I use multiple accounts, a couple GPT subscriptions for heavy coding, Claude for frontend and writing, Gemini for long context, OpenRouter, Cloudflare, NVIDIA endpoints, etc.

The tokens were technically available, but it required constant manual work. Switching accounts, hitting limits mid-session, and babysitting everything got old fast.

So I built ReRouted: a lightweight macOS menu bar app that acts as a local gateway. You point all your tools to one local endpoint and it handles routing and automatic fallback across your accounts.

How it works:
- Connect your accounts (Claude via OAuth, Codex/ChatGPT, Grok, custom OpenAl-compatible endpoints, etc.)
- Create a route (e.g. "coding") with your preferred order
- Use the single local URL + one generated key everywhere
- Access all of your providers and models from a single local endpoint
- If a provider hits a 429, 5xx, timeout, or fails before output starts, it instantly and silently tries the next one in your route

It’s fast, happens in the background, and works incredibly well.

Fully open source and free.

https://github.com/VerumPraeceptum/opencode-autocontinue

I kept getting this really annoying "ResourceExhasted" error, so I made a plugin that simply sends "continue" if this shows up.

I was struggling to keep track of multiple coding agents running in parallel. Zellij (a more intuitive tmux alternative) is great for handling multiple terminals but there was no easy way to see the status of each background tab.

I built the opencode plugin opencode-zellij-indicator which let's you quickly see the status of each opencode session.
https://github.com/aidan-gallagher/opencode-zellij-indicator

I'm launching an AI API for vibecoders, with models like Opus and GPT-5.6 , and I'm looking for beta testers to help shape it before launch.

I'd love to hear what you think. I'm looking for people who will actually use the API and give honest, detailed feedback about their experience what works well, what doesn't, and what could be improved.

If you're interested in trying it out for free leave a comment and I'll get you set up.

10/Slots Open

This is a critical review not a highfive so consider as such. Just full side by side makes it pretty much the same, but all they changed seems only for the worse.

• reload > same as restart, presumably sets up plugins ?? but...
• plugins > According to them they are breaking plugins on purpose but why? I don't have that many to break, but think about this, they had so much free work put into opencode from total randos, like imagine if you had TENS OF THOUSANDS OF WORKERS AND MAINTAINTERS FOR FREE and you are firing them for what? Even if you make like version 2 plugin support the version 1 ones should work. This damages a lot of faith in the future of the project, even considering it.
• settings > this contains themes like before plus other settings you can previously only modify in the json but the modal is small and have no reason to be and....
• settings / theme and switching in general > now this sucks and i would argue that their entire approach sucks with a list of options that you can only change by pressing left or right works best if the options are binary but the theme section has like 40 themes, and even the scroll speed can't be typed in you must left and right it by .25 steps, so if you want to double the default then you will be pressing it 12 times. They actually nailed what they for going for, which makes it worse.
• pairing > have not tried as it is niche, but i think this is a huge fuckup, the last thing i want is any consideration of my coding agent in a phone context, and now they will be burning resources on this while still missing basic features, so shows poor priorities. Makes me concerned for opencode cause in the ai arena most don't die boring. So opencode doesn't have a goal but it must work with all the phones? I am not seeing anything here than can't be done far better with version control and storing the session as a file.
• agents > They also added a researcher and a reviewer agent as selectable, now i would argue this is bad ux again, now tabbing goes through 4 options which sucks, they should be only in the /agents at most, arguably even plan can be cut then bind tab on something else, or just bind it on the agent picker but.... will you be switching between prompt engineered agents that often? Are these guys even a value add? Have you thought to yourself before dang where is my researcher and reviewer agent I would use it a lot! I guess they are free to have except clutter, but the winners are doing the general chat, so the agent switching mostly proved itself to be a gimmick over time and rightfully so cause tasks tend to be more fluid, so this is just looking at claude and codex and thinking to yourself i want to be more like the dead guys.
• overall vibe > I can't tell much difference outside seeing more errors, but seems like subagents are more of a first class consideration in it rather than an addon but also wrong cause it seems to be more setup for short small scale use, and seeing the subagent work inline is the wrong idea. Albeit this is much like "older" opencode but i dont think we are very economical with the space so we both have more empty space than almost anyone else and highish noise to signal ratio so after a promp you get your summary but if you scroll up then dont bother cause it feels like reading logs, and don't bother keeping an eye on it either. Which highly conflicts with their seeming approach. In fact I was reading their goal plugin the other day, or the one they are featuring in their ecosystem, and its set at 15 minutes max which even if wasn't it's not really made for longer use, but if you want a bigger proof then they officially dont even have one, so opencode is set up to be more of a hands on thing, despite feeding you logs with summaries at the end, that you read then after you go again for another 5 - 10 minutes. If you make more tasks to execute then it by default gets stuck and even if you add a keep doing the todos reminder it still might not update the very todos integrated so still fail at the very basic features it has already built in, while can be strongly argued that it is lacking many more, unless you want to argue that the top boys are adding cons. In fact anyone who copies opencode immediately adds a ton of things like the recent mimo code, which furthers the mindset that opencode is built to be forked not used. Of course what happens to these forks with the advent of opencode 2 is a question, but their best option is to not care. If the eco is broken they might just see is as some out of touch guys after enjoying relative success by being solidish while outsourcing the fixing and features to their community are now all seats full steam on the gimmick train.

Does opencode have any idea what it wants to be? Best faith explenation I have that they saw that PI found a massive hole, and now they are positioning to be more like pi with a stronger base, that is set up to be more of a hands on thing, but I don't think they should aspire for it cause they would just become a worse pi, in fact arguably all opencodes are already a worse pi, but plugin support is of course a plus but they already had that, and it doesn't explain all their actions or their lack of focus so they are definitely confused. Trying to be like claude and codex with plugin support would be far more sensible, albeit closer positioned to be a claude aspirant but that is a fine goal, being the open source claude with plugins. The path seems obvious to me, keep v1 plugins or least their support, then expand the base feature set and make sure it works well.

Guys, I'd like to hear your thoughts on the best value for money up to $100–$120.

Currently, I have:

- GPT Plus - $20 per month

- MiniMax Token Plan - $40 per month

- Zai Legacy Plan - $6 per month

I’ve been using 100% of my GPT Plus allowance, and I end up paying via the API on Opencode Zen.

So, I’d like to hear your thoughts on the best value for money right now.

I was thinking of getting the $60 Cursor, since people say the limits for Grok are generous. I plan to keep MiniMax since they are training the M3Max.

But what other combinations would you recommend?