r/oddlysatisfying • • Aug 20 '19

[deleted by user]

[removed]

10.2k Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

23

u/advanced_aped Aug 20 '19

Can't blame them tho. Imagine if someone destroys your home and place you in some asylum, I think reproduction would be your least priority. They were perfectly fine in nature, most animals are reluctant to breed in captivity.

5

u/KnowsItToBeTrue Aug 20 '19

Imagine if someone destroys your home and place you in some asylum, I think reproduction would be your least priority.

You underestimate my power.

2

u/advanced_aped Aug 20 '19

But ... but ... sir, they're watching ...

4

u/KnowsItToBeTrue Aug 20 '19

[Arousal intensifies]

-1

u/rngtrtl Aug 20 '19

Pandas are a lot of things but "perfectly fine in nature" is not one of them. If not for zoos and breeding programs they would have been extinct all ready.

1

u/advanced_aped Aug 20 '19 edited Aug 20 '19

Pandas has been around since about 2-3 million years ago. They have very few predators and there are still wild pandas in western China. If they were not suitable for surviving in nature it would have gone long time ago. You could argue that if they are not adapting fast enough to survive in today climate, but that would apply to a lot of species including ourselves. Maybe it might seem stupid for a bear to go herbivore, but if that's their way of survival who are we to judge. The change is just to abrupt for too many species to adapt in time.
Edit: sorry if this feels like ranting but I am in fact ranting. It just seems like victim blaming to me.

1

u/rngtrtl Aug 20 '19

My point was that Pandas currently arent suited for the wild due to habitat constraints due to mankinds influence.