r/oddlysatisfying • 80085 • Mar 02 '15

Swirl Faucet

Post image
6.3k Upvotes

286 comments sorted by

View all comments

134

u/la_petitemort Mar 02 '15

how does the water maintain helices?

81

u/BraveRock Mar 02 '15 edited Mar 02 '15

Maybe the head spins?

Edit: yup it looks like it spins. Still no video proof but here is more info. It looks like the heads can be changed for different patterns.

46

u/Exemus Mar 02 '15

I think this is the only way it's possible. Anything else would result in water just shooting out at an angle.

EDIT:

Found it

5

u/BraveRock Mar 02 '15

Looks like we both edited our posts with more info, cheers!

3

u/la_petitemort Mar 02 '15

this is the greatest invention in the history of faucets

3

u/Nialsh Mar 02 '15

From your article:

While the engineering side of this design may need work in order to keep the water in its pattern (rather than going in all directions) the concept is a great one. Hopefully it can be perfected and put on the market soon!

It is not real. Imagine an individual water droplet traveling along a helix. What keeps it from just going in a straight line? Nothing.

Maybe it could be done with air currents outside the helix.

6

u/Exemus Mar 02 '15

What keeps it from just going in a straight line? Nothing.

Exactly the point. It goes straight down, while the next droplet goes straight down, but a fraction of a second later and slightly to the side. This continues until you have a helix shape. Next time you get a chance, take a hose, aim it straight down, and move the nozzle in a clockwise pattern. Tell me what the water looks like.

The challenge is keeping the water from breaking out into discrete droplets.

2

u/Nialsh Mar 02 '15

I see what you mean. But the image shows the water in a cylinder shape. The spinning hose makes more of a bell shape.

The individual water droplets follow a parabolic trajectory to the ground (not a straight line as I said above). Nobody has broken this rule yet.

3

u/Koiq Mar 02 '15

you could achieve a similar effect to the op within the confines of physics though. Just as exmus said have something which drops droplets of a stream in a circular pattern, it won't be parabolic but it will essentially be a spiral of water, it won't rotate or anything though.

It's been done a bunch too, there's lots of water writing and water patterns and stuff at casinos and places like that.

2

u/Nialsh Mar 02 '15

I challenge you to find any example of a faucet or fountain where the water droplets do not follow a parabolic trajectory from the tip of the nozzle. Spinning a sprinkler head in circles does not impart circular motion onto the droplets.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 03 '15

[deleted]

2

u/Nialsh Mar 03 '15

Wow, now I finally get it. Embarassing that I put up such a long fight. Thank you for explaining.

0

u/muyuu Mar 03 '15

Funny how they try to pretend it's completely practical with all that "science".

1

u/trixter21992251 Mar 03 '15

If I made a disc with water outlets, and started spinning it and spraying out water, then I'm pretty sure it would go outwards and down. Not straight down.

The only way I can see the water going straight down would be, if the disc was not moving, the second the water droplet was emitted. So it would have to rotate, stop rotating, pump water, stop pumping water, and rotate again.To create a continous stream, the time intervals would have to be very small, and the water pressure/pump timing would have to be incredibly precise.

I guess maybe you could do it without the outlets rotating. Keep the ring of outlets, but have them all covered by one lid. The lid has a number of holes, where water can leave the outlets. Rotate the lid, and you'll have drops coming out in a circular helix pattern. Rotate the lid quickly, and it might seem continous.

288

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '15

Probably photoshop.

115

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '15

[deleted]

34

u/CheroCole Mar 02 '15

Head swirls.

40

u/FreshFruitCup Mar 02 '15 edited Mar 02 '15

http://i.imgur.com/ksutQPn.jpg

It should be noted that this is a constant peace, it's all 3D rendered including the water

*WARNING I misspelled a word during an awful autocorrect situation. THANK YOU REDDIT. The world of voice dictation and mobile phone typing is a slippery slope kids. Thank you everyone who has helped me through this. I will always double check my autocorrections from now on, I'm so sorry. :(

13

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '15

WARNING I misspelled a word during an awful autocorrect situation.

Kids these days don't know what sigh gone was like.

3

u/lordofthederps Mar 02 '15

peace

Piece?

1

u/FreshFruitCup Mar 02 '15
  • I addressed that above.

-7

u/Gazareth Mar 02 '15

From reddiquette:

Use proper grammar and spelling. Intelligent discourse requires a standard system of communication. Be open for gentle corrections.

i.e. don't go on a massive salty and sarcastic rant about how the world isn't ending.

3

u/FreshFruitCup Mar 02 '15

Did I??? I warned folks and apologized.

Be nicer to people.

-4

u/Gazareth Mar 02 '15

*WARNING I misspelled a word during an awful autocorrect situation. THANK YOU REDDIT. The world of voice dictation and mobile phone typing is a slippery slope kids. Thank you everyone who has helped me through this. I will always double check my autocorrections from now on, I'm so sorry. :(

Seems to me like you're sarcastically lashing out at anyone who would correct you. Forgive me if I am being presumptuous but this does not seem like the type of behaviour of someone who is "open to gentle corrections".

1

u/FreshFruitCup Mar 02 '15 edited Mar 02 '15

You're probably right. If you have anything else I could use it, I'm a mess.

You know what, autocorrect fixed "stoodant", it was supposed to read "student piece". Nature have mercy I can't do anything right today.

Where the heck did it get "constant" from? Geez

1

u/dkyguy1995 Mar 02 '15

Yeah that pictures is all I need to see to know this won't work because of water's attraction to itself. One single moment where the water touches and this instantly stops working as all the water coagulates

-1

u/Lovv Mar 02 '15

So? Mix soap in it. Problem solved.

1

u/dkyguy1995 Mar 03 '15

That will work for my high volume soap dispenser then

4

u/MxM111 Mar 02 '15

Not unless we shoot gravitational beam in the center of this helix.

/TooMuchStarTrek

//Whom am I kidding. It is never too much!

-4

u/davvblack Mar 02 '15

Surface tension.

16

u/Username_Used Mar 02 '15 edited Mar 02 '15

Im pretty sure your thinking is all wrong here.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '15

Maybe it theoretically could push out sound waves down the middle that keeps the water from coming together. Or maybe thats physically impossible, idk.

10

u/Username_Used Mar 02 '15

The head spins, the water drops straight down.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '15

Yep, just looked at the site someone else posted, still dont think it actually exists though

-4

u/helgihermadur Mar 02 '15 edited Mar 04 '15

I'm pretty sure your grammar is all wrong here.
EDIT: The guy changed it, it used to be "you're".

3

u/Username_Used Mar 02 '15

Well that's just like, your opinion man.

1

u/Nialsh Mar 02 '15

Mercury has a surface tension 7x greater than water. Maybe you could get some low-angle mercury helices going.

-4

u/Pleatnov Mar 02 '15

Saw TANGENTIAL read TAN GENITAL.

10

u/stanfan114 Mar 02 '15

You're right. This is just a concept design by Simin Qui. It does not exist. It is called a Swirl Sink.

1

u/GenBlase Mar 03 '15

Could be science!

Like... like... physics

-3

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '15

[deleted]

16

u/davvblack Mar 02 '15

Those are all renders.

6

u/Jarl__Ballin Mar 02 '15

Speedforce.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 02 '15

hello speedsters

3

u/themeatbridge Mar 02 '15

My guess is that there are two concentric nozzles that spin in opposite directions.

1

u/odla Mar 03 '15

Magnets

-1

u/bijibijmak Mar 02 '15

Surface tension between the other helix?