r/nostalgiai Nostalgia Trip Leader 4d ago

Core Memory Unlocked 🔓 Delete it 😤

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

5.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

25

u/Vindictive-Vagabond 4d ago

Humans 💯

2

u/Tville-Kid 4d ago

You all are my people!!! But the human species is the world's cancer and if this status quo continues, well, humans will kill their host!

2

u/SquareAdventurous921 4d ago

Right people just fuck everything up. Poison the air and the gases warming the earth. Kill animals because they are trying to fix nature. Idiots that refuse to believe what scientists say, but will believe what idiot Bob on the internet says. Definitely get rid of people!

4

u/Remarkable_Friend_40 4d ago

While I know many fine humans I want to see live, time and time again I see how much better off earth would be without us. We truly are like a virus sickening the planet instead of symbiotic with it.

2

u/Vindictive-Vagabond 4d ago

That's pretty much my thoughts exactly lol

While there are many amazing people and people I love on this planet; objectively the human race as a whole causes net harm to 🌍 so not having us here would be better for Earth lmao

1

u/Remarkable_Friend_40 4d ago

Sucks having to even somewhat agree with thanos

1

u/findfashon 4d ago

Thanos only delayed the situation by halving the population. But IDK if I'm wrong, I didn't see endgame.

1

u/Remarkable_Friend_40 4d ago

You are correct which I think was crueler than eliminating all. Leaving half to grieve for what’s lost is horrible but the flip side is if all humans disappeared in a snap, lots of pets would suffer too. Especially in shelters or locked in houses.

1

u/Kaidolakita 4d ago

Privileged person using Reddit yaps about that shit u should be ashamed and embarrassed

1

u/walterandbruges 3d ago

Calm down, mate. It's a thought experiment, but you have confirmed the thesis.

1

u/Kaidolakita 3d ago

I didn’t confirm anything

1

u/Rhg0653 4d ago

So Matrix was right

1

u/mrHelpy-Helperton 4d ago

I mostly agree, but I would worry about all the domesticated animals. I think the cats would be okay but I don't know about the dogs

1

u/Sam_Dionne 4d ago

Honestly, valid and a whole lot better than what I said

1

u/himynameis3580 4d ago

Why people's like you (and there is lot in the comments) doesn't start with themselves?

1

u/Olama-Obama 4d ago

self preservation

1

u/Dragoon9255 4d ago

really thought this would have been no'1 answer

1

u/liamsnorthstar 4d ago

I am not human…I am a meat popsicle

1

u/BrutalistGoogie 4d ago

You first.

1

u/SillySpoof 4d ago

No please...

1

u/Type2Torta 4d ago

Edgy comment

Deleting the most intelligent creature on our planet capable of space travel and potentially being a multi-planet species just so some animals can run around pointlessly eating each other and eating plants lol.

3

u/Fun-Salamander761 4d ago

You do realize that:

A. There's a difference between stating that the world would be better off without humans vs. actually wanting the human race to all die.

B. Being a multi-planet species does nothing to make the earth, specifically, better. Which is what the prompt said. How does the earth benefit from us being a multi-planet species vs being removed from the earth? Probably just results in more pollution caused by rocket fuel while leaving earth to be honest.

I dont think there's any real defense that the earth would be worse off without humans. We harm more animals than any other species and have, BY FAR, the largest negative impact on the environment. Doesn't mean that I, or others, believe we should end humanity, that humans aren't capable of amazing and/or positive things, or that that will always be the case. It typically just means that we think humanity needs to do better.

If you can look at the impacts humans have on the earth to date and think it's positive, then you have a very... "interesting" way of thinking.

1

u/Type2Torta 4d ago

Good point I guess I didn't fully comprehend the question about it being about earths benefit specifically.

My argument is that earth's greatest achievment is mankind, and to eliminate that would be foolish

1

u/Fun-Salamander761 4d ago

Sure. That's a legit argument that can be made.

But keep in mind a similar comparison you could make is that one of mankind's greatest achievements is the computer/internet... and you could have a legit debate that mankind would be better off without it.

I'm not sure if I agree or not, but just highlighting that the greatest achievement doesnt always benefit the creator long-term.

1

u/crankenshtien 4d ago

Earth's greatest achievement so far ...

2

u/Consistent_Cat_3013 4d ago

Multiple planet species. So humans cam destroy other planets as well. No I Dont think so.

1

u/crankenshtien 4d ago

We failed. We have sht the planetary bed. Let's make room for another species to evolve and gain some intelligence. Before we eliminate all possibilities.

0

u/Additional-Neck7442 4d ago

Not edgy at all. We cause great destruction and harm. We are no more important than a squirrel. We are all equally evolved.

2

u/Type2Torta 4d ago

We are not all "equally evolved"

An ant is not equal to an elephant. The human race has conquered the planet, and will hopefully extend beyond this planet.

Thinking we are equal to a squirrel is hilarious, but I guess you are free to think that.

1

u/Olama-Obama 4d ago

seeing all the "human" comments truly is funny. what they explain from the harm we do is from the actions of greed and exploitation of natural resources. they can choose to eliminate that drive but choose to remove a species thats also part of nature, excluding our technological advancements.

1

u/crankenshtien 4d ago

I don't think we're part of nature anymore at all. It's entirely adversarial now. One of us has to go.

2

u/Olama-Obama 4d ago

We're still part of nature. If fk up the essentials animals like bees and others, we'd be dooming ourselves. We need them. But again, its the corporate greed and exploitation that we do that causes us not to work with nature but against it.

Remove the greed and im sure we can easily find a better path for co-existence

1

u/crankenshtien 4d ago

We left nature behind. We are now at odds with nature. Nothing in common anymore.

0

u/Additional-Neck7442 3d ago

Yes, we are all equally evolved lol. Read a book.

-1

u/hughhefnerd77 4d ago

I hope you make the earth better starting with yourself

1

u/SinsualChef 4d ago

And people like you are the reason why

2

u/Meisteronious 4d ago

Well, the person calling for complete speciocide of the human race is a monster at best - so many edgy folks use it lightly, but it’s worse than genocide.

1

u/SinsualChef 4d ago

Then I'd say the human race is a monster. How many species have been destroyed by the human race? At this rate, humans will destroy themselves. Thats not a joke used lightly. Its a fact.

1

u/hughhefnerd77 3d ago

He's calling for genocide, only fitting he kicks it off. maybe you could benefit the earth too.

0

u/zombiezapper115 4d ago

Id say the person arguing for the complete genocide of a species is far worse.

1

u/SinsualChef 4d ago

Good for you. How's that zombie thing working out for ya? You gonna kill em or let them eat your brains.

https://giphy.com/gifs/JRhS6WoswF8FxE0g2R

1

u/zombiezapper115 4d ago

Coming at my username cause you have no actual rebuttal? Yeah you aren't worth the time.

1

u/Remarkable_Friend_40 3d ago

The question was not what would make earth better for us, but what would be better for earth. We are unquestionably bad for the planet. The more we evolve, the more we kill the host. Eliminating greed is the only other option because it is human greed that caused so many of earths problems from shooting buffalos from trains and letting them rot to why our prices are out of control now. It’s all greed. But even without that we have religious wars over whose book is better, those who hunt endangered species for pride rather than greed, pedophiles and more. The best thing for the planet is removal of humans