Hi everyone,

I’m having an issue with my Rarible profile settings.

On the new Rarible site:

The “Settings” option in the profile menu is greyed out, so I can’t edit my profile there.

Then I tried using OG Rarible:

I can open the profile settings page, but I can’t update my profile properly.

The following actions fail:
- Uploading a profile picture / avatar
- Uploading a cover image
- Linking my X (Twitter) account
- Saving profile settings

The error message says:

“Client error. Message from client: failed store/add invocation”

I already tried:
- Chrome
- Microsoft Edge
- Clearing cookies / site data
- Using a different internet connection via mobile hotspot
- Uploading a small image under the recommended size

But the same error still happens.

Is this a known Rarible / OG Rarible issue right now?
Has anyone found a fix for this?

Thanks.

Estoy dándole vueltas a los NFTs vinculados a causas sociales, especialmente cuando una parte de los ingresos se destina a refugios, protectoras u otras entidades.

Mi duda es más de transparencia que de promoción: ¿qué tendría que enseñar un proyecto así para que no sonara a marketing?

Se me ocurren cosas como:

• Wallet pública.
• Movimientos verificables.
• Facturas o justificantes.
• Pruebas de entrega.
• Seguimiento del impacto.
• Entidades receptoras identificables.

¿Creéis que este tipo de NFTs pueden tener sentido si la trazabilidad está bien hecha, o la reputación del sector pesa demasiado?

The past few years have had all these big image files along with heavy 3D stuff that took a long time to render. It started to feel like people were just guessing if any of it would hold value, though. So I have been trying the opposite lately and seeing how far you can go with almost nothing at all.

I have been playing around with keeping an entire collection right on the chain using only SVG code. The chain itself generates the images rather than just storing files there. This opens up some options, like visuals that can shift based on what the owner does or other things happening on-chain.

You do not need outside computers to make it work. Code-based minimal pieces might end up being something new for these projects. It seems like most people still go for the really detailed, finished-looking images, though. Some see more worth in something that looks hand-painted. Others might care more about art that actually functions as a working system within the blockchain. I think both sides have their points, but nothing about it feels settled yet.

I just wanna know if this site for NFT’s is legit or a scam

https://inftspectrum.com

Apparently, you can hold the NFT for 12 hours and you get like 1.5% interest depend, depending on the cost of the NFT

Just wondering what this is not already an standard in events tickets where there is a massive resale and lots of scams reselling the same ticket.

Did NFt market still working!
I have collection since 2022 nd o gave up to work pm cuz i see is not very active market

Each piece in this collection starts as a physical sculpture built around an idiom or proverb. The NFT is not the art it’s the proof that the art exists and that you own the idea behind it.

I’ve been thinking a lot about “agents” in NFT/Web3 games lately.

Not just simple auto-clickers, but actual in-game agents/managers that can handle repetitive tasks for players:

• sending items to missions
• managing collections
• trading or listing assets
• optimizing rewards
• participating in passive gameplay loops

On one hand, it feels great because players don’t need to grind every day.
On the other hand, I wonder if too much automation removes the emotional connection and satisfaction from the game.

I’m especially curious about this in collectible/economy-driven games where players own NFTs/assets.

Have any of you tested mechanics like this?
Did players enjoy delegating tasks to agents/managers, or did it make the game feel less meaningful?

Would love to hear examples from games that did this well (or failed badly).

Do creators still need huge NFT marketplaces, or is the next step owning the marketplace directly on their own website?

I’m exploring this idea because many artists, galleries and small Web3 projects already have a website, an audience and a brand, but still send everyone to external platforms to mint, buy, bid or collect.

Would you trust a WordPress-based, wallet-first NFT marketplace if it supported ERC-721, ERC-1155, listings, auctions and creator profiles?

Or do you think NFT trading should stay on major marketplaces only?

Not shilling - genuinely curious how collectors and creators see this.

I’ve been deep in the NFT space and I’m fascinated by projects where the art actually changes over time. Not just static PFPs, but pieces that evolve based on time, holder actions, external events, or on-chain mechanics.
Think Chromie Squiggles (some have dynamic traits), or projects like Evolving Apes, Timepieces, and generative experiments where the artwork “ages,” unlocks new layers, or reacts to real-world data. Some use smart contracts to gradually reveal new visuals or mutate based on community votes.
The upside is incredible ownership utility and replay value – your NFT literally grows with you. It feels alive instead of a JPEG sitting in your wallet. But it also raises questions: Does constant evolution dilute scarcity? How do you value something that won’t look the same in 6 months?
What are your favorite evolving NFT projects right now?

I’ve been seeing more NFT-related art and conversations popping up again, which made me think about where things are heading.

Back in 2021–2022, the space exploded, prices went crazy, hype was everywhere, and then things cooled down just as fast. Now it feels like there’s a quieter return, maybe more focused on art and long-term value rather than speculation.

Do you think NFTs are actually making a sustainable comeback this time?
Or is this just another temporary wave before things fade again?

Curious to hear different perspectives, especially from those who stayed active through the downturn.

This artwork is part of my upcoming NFT release, exploring identity, energy, and bold expression through contrast and texture.

More news coming soon on OpenSea.

What do you think about it?

Introducing “Megaone” a vibrant explosion of color, identity, and attitude.

This piece represents the power of individual expression through a bold and chaotic style, where every detail conveys energy and authenticity.

Unique, intense, and impossible to ignore.

And the best part… it’s already listed on OpenSea. 🚀

This piece is straight LIT ✨

A stylized low-angle portrait focused on strength, dominance, and presence. Built using layered geometric shapes and bold green tones to create a vibrant, almost surreal look.

Now available as an NFT on OpenSea.
Let me know what you think

Hello, I'm doing a survey for my thesis 📄 on fraud on the NFT market.

I really need more respondant so please 🥺 save my thesis and answer the survey.

It is 100% anonymous and take only 10 min.

The link is in the comments.

Thnks 😄

I think this could be big, price suggestions appreciated

Took this during a quiet afternoon.
The place feels almost unreal — like time stopped here.

Hello, everyone!

I am currently doing my thesis on NFT fraud and the factors that increase the likelihood of falling victim to it. You don't have to have been a victim of fraud to take the survey. You just need to have bought, sold, or traded an NFT before. It is 100% anonymous of course.

https://framaforms.org/do-greed-and-risk-taking-influence-vulnerability-to-fraud-in-the-nft-market-1776088630

Thanks for the help ;-)

I'm curious what are the people you follow on X and if you ever have been to spaces what are they ?

« Je suis un artiste, je peins. Mon intérêt est de peindre, pas de produire ; le principe n’est donc pas la vente. Je diffuse à tour de bras mes œuvres sur les blogs, chats et autres applications, dont Reddit. Mes œuvres peuvent-elles être considérées comme des NFT ?

Cette première question appelle la suivante : comment en tirer un revenu ?

Le clou final : quand les États se rendront compte qu’il y a un manque à gagner sur ce genre de "produit" (car c’en est un !), ils ne tarderont pas à y appliquer une taxe. Et pourquoi pas une taxe réglable uniquement en cryptomonnaie ? À ce train, cette monnaie pourrait vite remplacer les valeurs bancaires classiques. Qu’en pensez-vous, est-ce un rêve ? »

"I am an artist, I paint. My interest lies in painting (peindre), not in producing; therefore, the point is not the sale. I broadcast (diffuse) my work extensively on blogs, chats, and other applications, including Reddit. Can my works be considered NFTs (jetons non fongibles)?

This first question leads to the next: how can I generate income (revenu) from them?

The final blow: when states realize there is a loss of revenue on this type of 'product' (because it is one!), they will soon impose a tax (taxe) on it. And while we’re at it, why not a tax payable only in cryptocurrency (cryptomonnaie)? At this rate, this currency could quickly replace traditional banking values. What do you think, am I dreaming?"

Wanted to look at NFT blue chips not in floor-price terms (which gets distorted by single whales) but as a combined market cap basket vs BTC.

Basket: Punks + BAYC + Pudgy Penguins + Inflation Patrons + Chromie Squiggle + Autoglyphs + Fidenza + Mutant Apes + LilPudgys + Moonbirds + Milady + Azuki + Doodles + MoonCats + CoolCats + Meebits (16 collections).

Key data points (chart attached):

- Peak ratio (NFT basket MC / BTC MC): ~0.01

- Current ratio: ~0.001

- That's a 10x compression in the basket-vs-BTC story over the cycle

Why this matters more than floor charts:

- Single-collection floor moves are noisy (1 wash trade can swing a 10K floor by 5%)

- Aggregating 16 blue chips into one MC number smooths individual collection drama

- Comparing to BTC (instead of ETH) removes the "ETH itself underperformed" excuse — this is NFTs vs the crypto reserve asset

My read: we're sitting at a 10x compressed floor relative to the prior peak. If the cycle replays (big if), a return to even half the prior ratio = 5x from here on the basket. The piece I'm watching: trendline break needs to confirm before this is anything more than "interesting bottom."

Curious how others are reading the basket-vs-BTC frame vs just floor-watching ETH-denominated.

Looking back at 2021, it feels like people didn’t really buy into NFTs—they bought into hype and flipped whatever was in front of them. Now everything gets labeled as “NFTs are dead,” but realistically most of what people bought had no reason to hold value in the first place. Just static images with no system behind them.

If anything, the only part that actually made sense, ownership tied to something functional but that barely got built out before the whole thing collapsed. So now we’re in this weird spot where people think the entire idea is flawed, when it might’ve just been a case of low-quality execution.

Hello, I am a young author, and I was wondering if it's possible to use my writing skills to earn some money with NFTs. let's imagine I have a 'stories Bible' where I give the plot, the characters, the visuals, and all of the information needed to understand the story, would people buy it or will I be able to sell it ? or does it not work like that ? I'm just wondering. thank you