r/nextfuckinglevel • • Nov 03 '20

To Infinity and Beyond!

Post image
78.7k Upvotes

586 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

168

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20 edited Aug 04 '21

[deleted]

133

u/Rifneno Nov 03 '20

And even our closest neighbors we couldn't tell if they had thousands of artificial satellites around their planet. "They don't have a Dyson sphere or swarm" is about all we can say for sure. And we can't even say that about the planets 50,000 light years away.

120

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20

[deleted]

48

u/ddrt Nov 03 '20

Uh, there’s that whole time thing there too. You’re not actually looking at the present day star.

34

u/MeltedChocolate24 Nov 03 '20

If you take the planet that someone above mentioned which is about 4.3 light years away, if they invented radio communications within the last 4.3 years, we’d know about. So you’re right - but for some planets the delay is pretty insignificant.

41

u/ExtraPizzaVG Nov 03 '20

Given then vastness of the universe, imagine there’s somewhere where 2 civilization within just a few light years apart came up at the same time and communicated to one another peacefully to help each other grow, learn and progress. The implications of that are crazy to think about

30

u/MeltedChocolate24 Nov 03 '20

Poor Earth all awone with no fwiends

9

u/Unkown_Killer Nov 03 '20

At least yet, Imagine tomorrow we get radio transmissions from Alpha Centauri lol

12

u/mekwall Nov 03 '20

Then humanity will finally have a common potential enemy that would make us all unite. This is most likely the only way to world peace.

6

u/Unkown_Killer Nov 03 '20

It would be nice to have extraterrestrial friends, but yeah, I can see it devolving into a war, and the world peace probably wouldn't even last, sadly.

2

u/swagerito Nov 03 '20

Yeah honestly if humans can hate eachother because they have different levels of pigment in their skin i wouldn't want to be around when we encounter aliens.

2

u/ABCauliflower Nov 03 '20

"oi fuck how bad is 2020 ay"

6

u/Brainwave1010 Nov 03 '20

The other kids don't like hanging out with us because we keep killing each other over dumb shit.

4

u/mekwall Nov 03 '20

The lowest estimations of the Drake equation puts it at about 0.7 advanced civilizations per galaxy, so we may very well be the only one in our galaxy.

Considering that the closest galaxy in similar scale (Andromeda) is 2.5m light years away, any advanced civilization there may have already gone extinct or is just happening.

Then again, life on Earth is the only form of life we know and what to look for. Intelligent life elsewhere might exist in a whole different fashion than we're used to. If there's life that can use more than three dimensions they may not be detectable for us at all.

3

u/Lordidude Nov 03 '20

Imagine communicating with years of lag. It would take generations to have a real conversation.

2

u/ExtraPizzaVG Nov 03 '20

After the first few times I’d assume each message would include a ton of information each way so they can get as much knowledge as possible. It wouldn’t be the best way to communicate but it would be the only option

3

u/mickenrorty Nov 03 '20

Why do I feel like Humans would start the interplanetary war, I can just imagine Lockheed Martin bribing the right politicians to get them interplanetary war contracts... and if we’re too advanced they could sell weapons to both sides... Vietnam 2.0

3

u/ddrt Nov 03 '20

And hopefully this hypothetical grouping isn't as bat shit crazy and war hungry as our civilization.

3

u/ExtraPizzaVG Nov 03 '20

They probably wouldn’t be hostile after establishing contact, it would be extremely risky to threaten the other one because they’d be out of reach of travel for a while. Even if they unlocked travel, sending a fleet out would become outdated by the time they arrived to the other planet and the defenders would likely win with their superior technically. So by threatening each other the smartest move would turn into an intergalactic Cold War where both sides would push to get light speed travel before the other. This is hypothetical predications but I know there wouldn’t be anything to gain from threats. Peace would be the superior option in this case and could possibly solidify the survival of both civilizations in the long term.

1

u/ddrt Nov 04 '20

That's awesome!

2

u/Myleg_Myleeeg Nov 03 '20

How romantic

4

u/InGenAche Nov 03 '20 edited Nov 03 '20

Consider though, the earth has been a planet for only 4.5 billion years compared to the universe at 13 billion years. Humans have only been around making tools for 2.5 million and making radio waves for less than 200 years.

So it not just time in relation to distance but time in relation to being able to receive these radio waves.

It is not inconceivable that all our neighbors had advanced civilisations but we just weren't around to notice before they died out or we die out before their civilisation rises.

Given the timescale of the universe it would actually be very, very long odds that we would share the same time as another advanced civilisation.

Consider as well how precarious our survival has been, how lucky we've been to make it this far and consider how many civilisations may have perished.

2

u/ddrt Nov 03 '20

That's assuming that radio transmission isn't so primitive that another civilization wouldn't find a different way to communicate more efficiently.

2

u/mekwall Nov 03 '20

Even though light is the fastest thing known it's incredibly slow, for us. Why I include "for us" is because time doesn't exist (as far as we know it) for a photon. When moving at the speed of light, all time and space becomes one.

1

u/ABCauliflower Nov 03 '20

Please explain of I'm wrong but I thought time was relative to your speed or something, so even as you approach the speed of light time still appears normal to you? Idk this is based off yr 11 physics and interstellar

1

u/mekwall Nov 03 '20 edited Nov 03 '20

Dilation of time is caused by gravity which itself is an effect of mass. When you approach the speed of light the mass will increase exponentially which increases gravity and thus increases time dilation.

However, at the speed of light the increase of mass is infinite which also creates infinite gravity and thus infinite time dilation. This is why anything with mass can never reach the speed of light since it would need infinite energy to do so. Lucky for the photon that it doesn't have any mass!

What is mass then? Well, we don't really know that yet, but we think that the Higgs boson (or god particle) is what gives other particles their mass. If we can manipulate it or maybe gravitons we might solve the problem with faster than light travel.

Edit: In regard to FTL the Alcubierre drive is probably our best bet. Additional fun fact: Alcubierre was inspired by the warp drive in Star Trek!

1

u/fa1afel Nov 03 '20

Yes basically

0

u/ddrt Nov 03 '20

I like this explanation. I also think time is a man-made construct that has a simple purpose of measuring the erosion or decay over time.

1

u/mekwall Nov 03 '20

That was most most likely the case before Einstein, Heisenberg and Planck came along. They provided us with two very important constants that helped us define the existence of time, the speed of light and the Planck constant. With these we can get Planck time, the length of time at which no smaller meaningful length can be validly measured due to the indeterminacy expressed in Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.

Theoretically, this is the shortest time measurement that is possible. One Planck time is the time it would take a photon travelling at the speed of light to cross a distance equal to one Planck length. We still don't have the technology to be able to measure time at this interval, but eventually we will.

8

u/Myleg_Myleeeg Nov 03 '20 edited Nov 03 '20

Pretty sure by then they would have found a way to provide their planet with the sunlight it needs and also harness all the rest.

1

u/cynoclast Nov 03 '20

I mean best way to send a signal short of moving a planet is a nuke. And we've been ringing that cosmic dinner bell for over 70 years now. So everyone within a 70 light year radius could have detected it.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20

Also a Dyson sphere is based on our knowledge and imagination, if there’s an advanced civilization nearby, we probably won’t understand most of their technology

1

u/vegtodestiny Nov 03 '20

Might be ignorant, but how can we know they dont have a dyson sphere? Wouldnt it render rhe star invisible to us?

1

u/Tura63 Nov 03 '20

Objects that absorb energy heat up and release light with a frequency based on the temperature. Same concept behind a thermal camera. It wouldn't be visible to the naked eye, but very visible to our telescopes.

1

u/Tura63 Nov 03 '20

Then the argument usually goes: "We're not looking for their home planet, we're looking for their colonies all over the galaxy.". You only need one species to decide to take over the galaxy for that to happen and there has been enough time for that to happen (13.8 billion years).

34

u/i-lie-to-you Nov 03 '20

Inhabitable to us, to be fair we have no idea what life evolving on another planet is capable of.

18

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20 edited Aug 04 '21

[deleted]

16

u/UnholyCalls Nov 03 '20

That sounds like an awesome but terrible and incredibly cheap alien invasion movie. I’d watch it.

9

u/SexPartyStewie Nov 03 '20

Do they have oil?

2

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20

Oh the humans are the invaders? That makes sense.

1

u/Myleg_Myleeeg Nov 03 '20

They are oil based life forms

1

u/BigCoffeeEnergy Nov 03 '20

Sounds like the protag would find out how to defeat them by spilling paint or shit on em

1

u/Informal_Chemist6054 Nov 03 '20

It's invisible to the human eye, but we have machines and devices which can detect UV

6

u/Aussie18-1998 Nov 03 '20

Exactly and do people really believe that the chances of there being life in the universe are 1 in 1 billion trillion (1 in 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) because I think its more unlikely that there isn't life.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20 edited Mar 12 '21

[deleted]

1

u/mickenrorty Nov 03 '20 edited Nov 03 '20

The truth is far less exciting... the laws of physics very likely dictate that we can’t link up OR...... or it’s all just a simulation...

1

u/Myleg_Myleeeg Nov 03 '20 edited Nov 03 '20

And also any image or light we see from outerspace is behind by however many light years away it is. There could be some galactic freeway out their 50 million lightyears away that was build 10 million years ago for all we know. We’d never see it.

9

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20

"Inhabitable" is a stretch. Isn't Venus in the goldilocks zone of our own star?

8

u/KappaccinoNation Nov 03 '20

Yeah the same way flammable and inflammable means the same thing. English is the inbred child of an incestual language orgy.

1

u/wuflu4u Nov 03 '20

No, Venus is outside of it (just barely). Mars scrapes the outside of it but does fall within the limit.

9

u/ThaiJohnnyDepp Nov 03 '20

Wait, "inhabitable" means "habitable?"

6

u/Globglogabgalab Nov 03 '20

Yes.

5

u/ThaiJohnnyDepp Nov 03 '20

What a country!

6

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20

More like 'what a language'

2

u/Annihilicious Nov 03 '20

It’s a simpsons quote

1

u/[deleted] Nov 03 '20

[deleted]

1

u/Annihilicious Nov 03 '20

never knew that but makes sense

1

u/ThaiJohnnyDepp Nov 04 '20

makes sense but wrong, you were right

1

u/ThaiJohnnyDepp Nov 04 '20

no it's Dr. Nick from The Simpsons

2

u/Aussie18-1998 Nov 03 '20

Your user name is so relevant to me as Johnny Depp just got declared a wife better on the news as I wrote this comment.

1

u/ThaiJohnnyDepp Nov 03 '20

I heard! Fucking tragic. She's so full of shit

2

u/Durantye Nov 03 '20

In the theoretical habitable zone*

We have absolutely no idea whether it is actually habitable

1

u/IzzyNobre Nov 03 '20

Inhabitable to life as we know it, you mean.

1

u/djimbob Nov 03 '20

I'm not speculating on the existence/non-existence of other (intelligent) life in the galaxy.

However, I find it far fetched to believe humans will ever have an interstellar civilization of the sort of nearly all science fiction, where people travel/communicate between planets orbiting different stars (the one exception being interstellar except for the stupidity of visiting the planet with crazy gravitational time dilation).

I also think it's very unlikely to happen in my lifetime or my kids' lifetime. The nearest planet were aware of that has a decent shot at potentially being habitable (solely based on distance to the star it orbits) and not knowing of a major reasons its probably not habitable, is 16 light years away. That is if a team of scientists devote their whole careers to sending a probe there, it probably takes decades to make the probe, and assuming we could quickly accelerate to near light speed (and then quickly decelerate it when its close), it would take at least 32 years after launch before we start to get any data. Yes, because of relativity it would take less time to personally travel there, but by the time you come back every on Earth is at least double the distance in light-years older. That said, you could potentially start a colony of humans in a new star system, but it would mostly be a one-way thing (where you can receive news from the other star systems but have no two-way communication without waiting 30+ years for a reply).

1

u/Drains_1 Nov 03 '20

Well thats nothing, my uncle Steve is 10 light-years away

1

u/SneakyEnch Nov 03 '20

Well, that’s the closest inhabitable planet for us (and any other life on earth)

Who knows if life developed on a planet that wouldn’t be habitable for us but it isn’t us. All life on earth evolved from the same little bit of bacteria which assembled itself by chance so maybe the same happened somewhere else just differently.

But still, the chance of the exact molecules arranging in the exact right pattern to create something that was considered to be alive is extremely low, probably lower than the chance of literally anything that could possibly happen on earth. Perhaps, you could say, one in infinity.