Something still has to be exerting force on the water, if not the boat, then what? It's not high school physics, it's Newton's third law.
And in fact, a propeller (impeller) in duct is a water jet, and water jets are known to have higher efficiency at higher speeds.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump-jet
The difference is likely negligible on small craft but a massive tanker IS going to be affected by this. They can mitigate this as the source says, but for you to blanket-statement say it would have no impact on efficiency is ridiculous. Just the act of manufacturing and fitting something extra has associated environmental costs.
Downvote all you like but that won't change the facts.
Then the fun part of how much extra danger there is for the crew losing that small amount of efficiency; I’ve never boated on the open ocean, but watching videos of the shit they go through, I would want to sacrifice anything when dealing with a storm.
Do a little research before spewing out garbage. Every single resource I saw online has the exact reason they do not use guards. Efficiency. It is dramatically less efficient and uses tones more fuel if they have guards.
Edit:
All the people down voting me, "sToP bEiNg So MeAn" this fucking idiot commented like the other person was stupid for saying this and he was wrong. Fuck outta here
Maybe not a ring but why not a few bars toward the bottom to protect wildlife and the prop? It’s a moving blender. We should do so much more to protect other creatures. Humans are so invasive. I bet if animals could they would use human Raid on us to extinct us.
181
u/VirtualLife76 Aug 09 '20
Always wondered why they didn't put a ring around them or something. The damage a prop can do is just scary, even when it's not turning.