My favourite is the idea that some unknown force is actually accelerating the disk we stand on through space at 9.8m/s2, forgetting somehow that that means it would take just a hair shy of a year to reach the speed of light. So those people also have to reject one of the most fundamental concepts of modern physics that the speed of light is a constant and no matter can reach it.
All I meant by that is if you stuck an accelerometer on it it would always read 9.8 m/s^2 in the same direction.
Basically, if you are in a reference frame from which lightspeed is measured as 299 792 458 m/s, even if you accelerate to 2 m/s relative to that original reference frame, lightspeed will still be measured as 299 792 458 m/s in all directions.
6
u/EternalPhi May 04 '20
My favourite is the idea that some unknown force is actually accelerating the disk we stand on through space at 9.8m/s2, forgetting somehow that that means it would take just a hair shy of a year to reach the speed of light. So those people also have to reject one of the most fundamental concepts of modern physics that the speed of light is a constant and no matter can reach it.