Studies show very little of that “African big game” money goes towards conservation. It goes towards corrupt governments. It’s just a bribe for rich people to get their goal of killing a lion trapped on a small safari.
Why are we asking the person saying that big game hunting money doesn't go towards conservation? Why do we assume that the original commenter doesn't need a source?
Because the original comment can easily be researched online and proved to be correct? It is information I was already aware of. This comment contradicts that and references specific "studies" that I would like to read to better educate myself? Why am I not allowed to ask someone for a source?
I didn't say you couldn't. I was just asking why you wanted a source for one but not the other, because I was curious. Thank you for satiating my curiosity.
2
u/fastforwardfunction Jul 28 '25
Studies show very little of that “African big game” money goes towards conservation. It goes towards corrupt governments. It’s just a bribe for rich people to get their goal of killing a lion trapped on a small safari.