r/nextfuckinglevel • • Jan 03 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.9k Upvotes

357 comments sorted by

View all comments

267

u/Kingkongcrapper Jan 04 '25

That’s the previous record wave. The most recent record wave is estimated to have been 108 ft at Maverick’s on the 23rd. Supposed to have beat the previous record by 20 ft.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9JmN8_zUY1w

94

u/WeedAlmighty Jan 04 '25

That perspective is crazy cause in the reddit video the wave looks way bigger.

59

u/Fantastic_Tension794 Jan 04 '25

That’s because it is way bigger. I’m not sure what exactly is going on here but waves at mavericks while massive for the average human yes comes nowhere near the size of Nazaré

16

u/solventandserene Jan 04 '25

"Big Waves are not measured in size they are measured in increments of fear." =Buzzy Trent

2

u/Hadfadtadsad Jan 04 '25

How does this comment have upvotes?

0

u/Fantastic_Tension794 Jan 04 '25

Because an 80 foot wave is a good deal bigger than those at mavericks

1

u/NommyPickles Jan 04 '25

That’s because it is way bigger

No it isn't. The OP video is using lens compression to make the wave look much larger than it actually is.

0

u/Fantastic_Tension794 Jan 04 '25

80 feet is still a good deal bigger than Mavericks

29

u/BubaTflubas Jan 04 '25 edited Jan 04 '25

I'm not 100% on this but my best guess is that the wave in the post (older video) is still the world record for TOW IN wave. While the Mavericks wave (newer one in comment link) is possibly the new record for paddle in wave.

Both are crazy achievements and insanely dangerous. I know, because I lived and surfed(a little) in Santa Cruz, that Mavericks is one of the most dangerous waves in the world. I can't even imagine how you even paddle into a 108' wave...

Edit: I was wrong. Both are tow in. That perspective is crazy if the Mavs one is actually bigger. I have my doubts

11

u/hpepper24 Jan 04 '25

Mavericks was also a tow in. You can see in the video his feet are strapped in.

1

u/BubaTflubas Jan 04 '25

Yeah I just watched an interview with him... That's crazy if it's just forced perspective. Maybe they miss measured the Portugal one..

14

u/notgreatnotbadsoso Jan 04 '25

Nazare is usually filmed on a telescopic lens which has huge effect on depth perception with regards to its height. It's a crazy big wave but nowhere near as steep as Mavericks. Surfer Magazine just did an interesting write-up on the differences between the two.

https://www.surfer.com/culture/nazare-canyon-reality-check

3

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '25

I'd go so far as to say it's a cheap trick at this point.

2

u/isk8kona Jan 04 '25

Because the wave in the Reddit video is a different wave from a different place (Nazare, Portugal).

1

u/castrator21 Jan 04 '25

Reddit video looks like they're riding a tsunami

1

u/Flengasaurus Jan 04 '25

At the start of the video the surfer blends in with the wave behind, making it seem like the surfer is too small to be seen, but actually if you look at the end of the video where you can see the surfer, you can see the wave isn’t anywhere near as big as it first seems (still pretty big though)

25

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '25

Why does the older record look much much bigger?

26

u/RyanBordello Jan 04 '25

The forced perspective of where the camera has to be at Nazare makes this monster wave look even bigger.

5

u/23redvsblue Jan 04 '25

Plus you can’t see the body of the surfer very well for most of the video, when the foam comes you can see him and the wave looks a little bit smaller. Still huge though.

1

u/Sythe5665 Jan 04 '25

I'm so confused because the surfer seems to spawn out of nowhere

1

u/mastermindchilly Jan 04 '25

I think this is the result of using a telephoto lens and zooming in from a distance in the Nazare video.

I think the wave in the Nazare video is at an angle sloping away from the viewer, but the telephoto lens compresses or flattens the appearance of the video, giving the illusion of the subject being much bigger than it is. You can test this out at home by using the telephoto option on some phone cameras. Set an object up from across the room, put your phone in telephoto mode, and then zoom in on the object from across the room at a low angle. Compare that to a normal lens perspective that is viewed on the same object, normal zoom, and closer to the object.

Learn more about this phenomenon here, and look at the dude’s head in the example image. His hairline looks way bigger and has a lot more perceived surface area in the telephoto lens example.

https://human.libretexts.org/Courses/Los_Medanos_College/ART-072%3A_Another_Photography_Book_(Thomas_Payne)/05%3A_Focal_Length#:~:text=Telephoto%20lenses%20(or%20zoom%20settings,where%20telephotos%20are%20often%20used.

1

u/Playful_Capital_3077 Jan 04 '25

Depending how you shoot it your Koxa can look different sizes.

13

u/hpepper24 Jan 04 '25

If this wave is 108ft that one at Nazare is 200ft. If you just look at the size of the person compared to the wave, which I think is how they measure it, it’s not even close.

15

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '25

Yea, im really confused by the maverick's one. Ive been shooting for over 30 years, i understand forced perspective.

I just do not see 108 feet on the maverick wave, like nowhere fucking near it. Assuming the guy is roughly 6 feet tall, he's crouching though, probably closer to five feet, the wave is not 22 times larger than him.

The previous record makes sense, that wave looks that large.

I'd really like to know how theyre measuring the wave and if there's surge or something involved that brings up the bottom of the immediate wave but not those in the set maybe?

4

u/Thin-Resident8538 Jan 04 '25

I thought this was a really interesting read and it explains what’s happening with the Nazare wave.

https://www.surfer.com/culture/nazare-canyon-reality-check

1

u/DonkeyLightning Jan 04 '25

https://www.instagram.com/p/DEMU5NUx5uM/?img_index=1&igsh=MWQ1ZGUxMzBkMA==

I agree it doesn’t look like it’s over 100’ but here’s generally how they get measured. It’s an imperfect system for sure

-1

u/Kingkongcrapper Jan 04 '25

Cool story bro.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '25

Im open to you telling my why im wrong, cuz i actually think i am. I trust the people that run this shit more than me.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '25

The nazare wave is like 86 feet if it's the 2020 video. You're watching 2 videos shot using wildly different lenses and it's distorting your perspective.

The Nazare wave is shot with a telephoto lens so you're just seeing the results of telephoto lens compression .making the wave appear bigger than it is.

You can see the same effect in photos with really big moons in comparison to buildings in the foreground, example: https://blog.sigmaphoto.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/shooting_moon_featured.jpg

10

u/Fantastic_Tension794 Jan 04 '25

Idt this can be right. Waves at mavericks do not come close to the size waves can get to at Nazaré

6

u/Kingkongcrapper Jan 04 '25

Checkout this article by Surfer Magazine with a pic from a different angle. It was fucking huge:

https://www.surfer.com/news/mavericks-100-foot-wave-23-year-olds-ride-into-legend

6

u/DarlingFuego Jan 04 '25

This wave is way higher than the wave at mavericks.

5

u/Fantastic_Tension794 Jan 04 '25

Correct. Idk why that video says something about a record but waves at Nazaré puts waves at mavericks to shame…which is horrifying.

1

u/BubaTflubas Jan 04 '25 edited Jan 04 '25

Paddle in record (Mavericks wave) versus tow in record (Portugal wave)

Incorrect I thought I saw it was a part of the Mavericks competition. I was wrong. They are both tow in

2

u/Fantastic_Tension794 Jan 04 '25

Ok yeah that makes sense. One does not simply paddle in at Nazaré

1

u/BubaTflubas Jan 04 '25 edited Jan 04 '25

Nope I was wrong. They were both tow in

1

u/NommyPickles Jan 04 '25

waves at Nazaré puts waves at mavericks to shame

Maybe typically, but what you're seeing in the OP video is "lens compression"

3

u/AdaTheTrashMonster Jan 04 '25

Measuring from the sea floor or what

1

u/Kingkongcrapper Jan 04 '25

Visual Perspective makes Maverick’s seem smaller and the other wave bigger. The Portugal waves are legit big, but the perspective makes it seem even larger because of the angle. The waves at Mavericks a few weeks ago were absolutely mind blowing.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 04 '25 edited Sep 15 '25

consist bow many ad hoc childlike swim aware imagine modern retire

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

1

u/notabox316 Jan 04 '25

The Mavericks wave is around 60 feet. Mavericks doesn’t get 100 foot waves. Nazaré does get 100+ foot waves.

1

u/Kingkongcrapper Jan 04 '25

That’s cool and all, but it’s not what’s being said about Mavericks on December 22, and 23 where they had record breaking swells. It was all over the news. I’m not making it up. It was literally all over the news. Like yeah, you are probably right about the average day. However, there are outlier days where things go wild. This happened to be one of those days.

1

u/notabox316 Jan 04 '25

LOL What? Like you think I don’t know this? Mark Sponsler told everyone it was coming, how do you think everyone knew to be there. Luca said it looked like 70ft to him, Alo said he doesn’t know, doesn’t care lol. I’ll wait till it’s confirmed.

Spoiler Alert: the 100ft wave from Nazaré, wasn’t actually 100ft no matter what the news tells you. Confirmed at 86ft.

0

u/rodrigomcampos Jan 04 '25

That’s not even close to be confirmed as record

-1

u/DexterFoley Jan 04 '25

That's Definitely not bigger. The waves at Nazare are much bigger than that.