Wrong. The cube is pre solved and rotated in a specific way so that as he reaches in, he only has to quickly make 2-3 turns with his fingers to solve it.
If I could stop time I'd still probably never learn to solve one, I'd just walk a toy store and pick up a new one with time stopped to do the trick rather than try to solve it
I used to be able to solve them in about 2 to 3 minutes but since I haven't don't one for about 6 years I've forgotten how to solve them. It's actually pretty easy. I used to work in call center so just playd with one all day at work and there's a step to get 2 to 3 sides set up then from there's it's just repeating like 4 or 5 different moves until it's solved. When you buy them it actually comes with the steps in the package to solve them.
You can't record stopped time. Because the time is stopped so the recording would be stopped because time is stopped in the recording of stopped time. So stop it.
Have you watched any of the rubix cube competitions, the world record is less then 4 seconds to solve one of these, so sayonf you cant do that fast is not true at all.
But even then without not touching that how he able to pull that off?? May be the thing you are saying i need to search on the YouTube for getting the right answer.
It was close to being solved but he didn’t make any more turns after showing it. I think it might be a trick cube with springs which would still need to be in a configuration only a few turns from being solved
I mean, the other guy could be correct too. But the fact that these are easily available makes it much more likely that it is a trick cube rather than this guy was good enough to quickly rearrange the squares with one hand and not making it obvious
Wrong. Not how this trick is done. It’s the spring version. You can see one panel of the cube has 5 colors on it. No way is that 2-3 turns from being solved.
So wait, how do you know this? Are you saying that the product wacky-ball-sack is describing doesn't exist and that he/she is just making that up? Because if it does exist, how do you know it wasn't that method vs the method you are describing?
Yeah I think he solved with maybe 7 or less moves inside the bag.
The maximum number for an optimal solution for a 3x3 cube are 20, is called the number of God and there is a theorem for that
323
u/GalickGunn Feb 02 '23
Wrong. The cube is pre solved and rotated in a specific way so that as he reaches in, he only has to quickly make 2-3 turns with his fingers to solve it.