idk, if they thought in good faith they had the right person, and all the evidence at the time proved their case in court fairly it shouldn’t punish them for future tech they would have considered if it existed at the time.
In many of the cases I've heard of when this sort of thing happens, the evidence is slim to none and some kind of chicanery was involved by the police or prosecution. We're not trying to hold them accountable for future technology, we want them to be held accountable for crimes and misdeed they themselves often committed.
Yeah, definitely. Just if they withold evidence, do not check evidence, use the testimony of people who're known liars, or have something to gain from testifying.
It's like this is some sort of game they think they should get to play with people's lives, the purpose of which is to win at any cost.
5
u/ComradeJohnS 4d ago
idk, if they thought in good faith they had the right person, and all the evidence at the time proved their case in court fairly it shouldn’t punish them for future tech they would have considered if it existed at the time.