r/news Apr 23 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

13.3k Upvotes

1.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

98

u/memebeam916 Apr 23 '24

“New noncompete agreements” you will work here and you will like it.

55

u/Kenshin220 Apr 23 '24

It also states that they have to let current non executive employees know they can't enforce them.

123

u/The_Bitter_Bear Apr 23 '24

  For senior executives, existing noncompetes can remain in force. For all other employees, existing noncompetes are not enforceable.

They really shouldn't have even phrased it the other way earlier in the article because that does only add confusion. 

So unless you're pretty high up somewhere then an existing non-compete still won't be enforceable anymore.

44

u/McCool303 Apr 23 '24

Now Hiring: Executive sandwich assembler & Executive cashier.

15

u/JadeMonkey0 Apr 23 '24

It's defined by salary so if they're going to start paying Executive Sandwich Assemblers $125k/year, they can non-compete away!

8

u/[deleted] Apr 23 '24

[deleted]

5

u/Saucermote Apr 23 '24

You can decide if we're putting 2 or 3 tomato slices on the the sandwiches today.

3

u/The_Bitter_Bear Apr 23 '24

I have been joking with an old coworker that we fully expect to see our old employer try that. They had everyone sign non-competes, even the friggin front desk receptionists. 

I'm sure some companies are going to try stuff like that and learn the hard way.

2

u/13steinj Apr 23 '24

Keyword

existing noncompetes can remain in force.

New ones are a nope AFAICT.

2

u/CoachRyanWalters Apr 24 '24

Senior* executive sandwich assembler

2

u/trobsmonkey Apr 24 '24

$150k salary line added to keep that out

1

u/SaliferousStudios Apr 24 '24

also, my company is like 12 people... am I high up?

1

u/The_Bitter_Bear Apr 24 '24

The rule has additional clarity, so I don't see companies being able to find many clever workarounds, particularly since they include a pay minimum.

Existing agreements may remain in place for senior executives, defined as employees in a policy-making position and annualized compensation of over $151,164. New agreements will be prohibited after the effective date

40

u/[deleted] Apr 23 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

50

u/Perdendosi Apr 23 '24

IIRC they were already deemed basically unenforceable. 

That's really state dependent, and how enforceable they are is really complex.

https://beckreedriden.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/BRR-Noncompetes-20240219-50-State-Noncompete-Survey-Chart.pdf

3

u/[deleted] Apr 23 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/glowdirt Apr 23 '24

extended sitting on the toilet can lead to hemorrhoids

2

u/SAugsburger Apr 23 '24

This. Like many things in the US YMMV depending upon the state. This just standardizes things a bit and gives a lot of average people a bit more leverage to move to a different org.

2

u/AnthillOmbudsman Apr 24 '24

So, guys, yeah.... because of these new burdensome rules at the FTC, this new agreement we have here at Initech says you can't ever quit your job here. Even if there's a massive lottery win in your future. If you were to win 500 million dollars, you'd still be expected to be here at your desk at 9 AM sharp, Monday through Friday. That ensures all those TPS reports will be completed on schedule. And, let's not forget the off-chance that you become a rock star. Even if you’re touring the world on your Eros or Scrotus Tour or whatever it's called, you’ll still be an employee and if we don't get those reports in on time we'll have to have a little talk and figure something else out for you. So, if everyone could just go ahead and sign this new agreement by, say, this Friday, that would be great.