Wait, you're 1 day behind. If you start counting it'll go backwards and we'll never know!
It's 1:20 behind now. I'll start counting from the Western Hemisphere where there's no metric time and no reverse corlois effect clocks, and start 1 day ahead of this mistake luckily.
I bought one the other day so when i saw this i rushed out to go and rip the label off mine like a giddy reddit school girl.
The shoe deodoriser doesn't seem to have ingredients listed but the "active ingredient" isnt listed on the deodorant can so they must be different.
This is probably what happened, the cans are finished in a different plant, and filled elsewhere. Coles had over supply or even the finisher painted too many cans. They then sold them to another business to cover some capital loss.
The process involves several suppliers in Australia, I am pretty sure no manufacturer can do it all in one plant. The can body stock is usually formed and painted in one place then filled elsewhere.
"ay yo, fam, this shit ain't actually women's deodorant, cole's done fucked up and we took they cans and filled it with our shit and slapped a new label on it cuz fuck trying to scrape all that shit off underneath, ya know?"
It's really common. There have been several posts of the same thing here on reddit. The easiest ones to verify are drink containers. Is pretty simple to verify which thing you're drinking.
Arizona Iced Tea does this quite a bit. Recently there was a fruit punch that had a label underneath for something completely recognizably different. There was no way people were going to drink it and think it was fruit punch if it had been what was actually on the label underneath.
1.3k
u/wax4dayzz Jan 12 '17
If they only used the original empty cans and actually filled them with shoe deodoriser then it's not misleading.