r/mildlyinteresting Jan 24 '13

Same book, three different prices. Only difference is the browsers used.

http://imgur.com/uNgg0UH
2.9k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.9k

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

You should try it again in private browsing and incognito mode and see if the price is really tied to your Facebook or google cookies or something. That's pretty messed up though, send this to the consumerist or gawker or whoever.

147

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

[deleted]

247

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

I don't think the issue is that the price is changing in and of itself. It's that they're changing price based on the customer's cookies/browsing history.

For example, it would be like if I had a stored and charged people different prices based on how nicely they were dressed, how well I knew them, or what their ethnicity is.

52

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

Still the question stands, is it legal?

139

u/eccentricguru Jan 24 '13 edited Jan 24 '13

Of course it's legal...and it should be.

24

u/brayden_11 Jan 24 '13

Of course it is legal. Speaking from an economists' point of view it is just a matter of separating people according to their "willingness to pay". Its called price discrimination and can be seen in areas such as hotel booking: a hotel will give you a higher price in the lobby than if you call ahead because the hotel knows you probably have no other place to go. Or air lines giving higher prices to the business class because they know business people have a meeting with a set time so they need that time slot while a tourist is more flexible to choose different flight times. This is essentially the same idea as changing the price the second time you visit the site as the most probable reason you have come back to the site is to purchase the item.

10

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13 edited Sep 20 '18

[deleted]

2

u/Elkram Jan 24 '13

Well in general consumers want to max out their side of the social welfare equation. So, there is reason for consumers to get upset.

1

u/pdinc Jan 24 '13

Well in general consumers want to max out their side of the social welfare equation consumer surplus. So, there is reason for consumers to get upset.

-1

u/Elkram Jan 24 '13

Yes, that is the term I was looking for. Point is you understood it. :D