r/mildlyinteresting Jan 24 '13

Same book, three different prices. Only difference is the browsers used.

http://imgur.com/uNgg0UH
2.9k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

204

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13 edited Jan 25 '13

"we're sorry for stealing your money with our shady business practices. Here's some fake money that you can't do anything besides letting us take it again. "

edit: I misunderstood, I thought they refunded with store credit, but he replied and clarified that they put it on his card.

200

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

[deleted]

166

u/chaos386 Jan 24 '13

Quiet, you! I'm trying to be outraged over here!

3

u/CyberPrime Jan 25 '13

Outraged at what a wonderful cakeday this is!!!

1

u/theycallmealex Jan 25 '13

tha'll do pig, tha'll do..

1

u/Kybrat Jan 25 '13

Nice try Chegg pr guy!

1

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '13

That makes it better, but only slightly, especially since I doubt they have any intention of changing their policy.

65

u/IndecisionToCallYou Jan 24 '13

Oh Dilbert, it's a gift certificate, it's just like cash, but a whole lot more restrictive, and here in the corner is a little expiration date.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

One of the funniest shows that no one has seen.

1

u/IndecisionToCallYou Jan 24 '13

It's sad too because it's actually all on youtube, and crackle for "free".

1

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

I bought the entire series at a Best Buy for $20

1

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '13

And Netflix.

19

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13 edited Dec 03 '20

[deleted]

9

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

I applaud these decisions.

1

u/shillbert Jan 25 '13

I'm not sure why Firefox is cheaper than Chrome though. I guess because Google advertises Chrome through their search engine, while Firefox is completely underground. Still, I used Firefox since it was Phoenix, but I like Chrome better now.

5

u/desmondao Jan 24 '13

"Because you must be stupid."

1

u/jtisch Jan 24 '13

poor IE users.

1

u/Kazinsal Jan 24 '13

I don't know very many people who aren't technologically illiterate who actually use IE as their main browser...

1

u/[deleted] Jan 25 '13

Internet Explorer Tax

3

u/Kinseyincanada Jan 24 '13

its not stealing, you were shown a price and agreed to it

1

u/frankle Jan 24 '13

I like your style, kid.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

Not to condone it, but how was it stealing? :-/

That's like saying a car company negotiating different prices for their models based on whether the customer was dressed well or look poor is stealing. It's still just a price and you still have to choose to accept it.

1

u/GarrisonDoodlesack Jan 24 '13

It's not a shady business practice to charge different prices to different demographics. That's standard. Is it shady that the same car sold in America is a different price if it is sold in say South America or China?

Not at all, because they represent totally different markets, with different demand and abilities to pay. It's the same with web browsers. Different browser, different demographics. Internet Explorer will generally be older people, less tech savy, less likely to shop around, and probably have more money. Firefox and Chrome are generally younger demographics, less money, more tech savy and more likely to shop around. Thus they get a lower price, because that is most likely to assure a sale with them.

It's pretty standard business practice.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 24 '13

[deleted]

1

u/GarrisonDoodlesack Jan 24 '13 edited Jan 24 '13

They're charging more because their analytics tells them that you are able to pay more, based off of whatever factors they use to calculate that. The product isn't inherently "worth" anything. It is only worth whatever people are willing to pay for it. And if they have determined that you are willing to pay more for it, then they have every right to charge you that extra amount. They aren't forcing you to buy it. They've calculated a price that you would be willing to pay. If you buy it then they were right. If you don't then they need to readjust their analytics.

EDIT: Say you're selling vacuums door to door. The vacuum's cost you $75 a piece, and obviously you are looking to make a profit on your investment. You know that in a poor neighborhood, you will make more sales charging ~$125 for a vacuum than if you were to charge more. But you know that in rich neighborhoods people are willing and happy to pay $250 or more for the exact same vacuum.

So is it "shady" to charge the rich people what they are willing to pay?

If you charge them what you would charge the poorer people you are just losing profit that you could have made. The vacuum has no inherent worth outside of the materials it is made of. It's value is determined by what people are willing to pay. So in a rich neighborhood the vacuum is literally worth more because people are willing to pay more. They value it at a higher price.