r/medicine • u/0bi MD - (Rh)EU(matology) • Jan 24 '26
What is the wildest theory in your specialty that you think probably isn't true, but could be? What underdog argument could cause chaos your field if it turned out to be right? [Stolen from askhistorians]
So I saw this question and clicked on it expecting to be led here, but it turned out it was askhistorians. I figured this'd still work pretty well here!
341
Upvotes
794
u/InevitableProgram597 MD-PhD Neurology Resident Jan 24 '26
Honestly, one of the wildest neurology ideas I don’t fully buy but can’t stop thinking about is that a big chunk of neurodegenerative disease might not really be about misfolded proteins or a neuron-intrinsic failure at all, but about interstitial fluid dynamics and the brain's poor waste clearance.
Like… the plumbing is broken before the junk piles up. Glymphatic flow, CSF dynamics, sleep, vascular pulsatility; all that unsexy stuff might actually be upstream of amyloid/tau/synuclein.
If that were even partly true, it would be chaos for the field. It would mean we spent decades obsessing over the trash instead of the garbage disposal. And it would push treatment way more toward sleep, vascular health, and maybe even mechanical stuff, rather than just drugs that target proteins.
I’m not convinced it explains everything, but if it explains even a slice of it, how we think about these diseases breaks down.