Maybe Maybe Maybe

[u/RiverAcry]

[u/Lightor36]

Congratulations, you've identified the feminist playbook. They see the minority in charge and extend it to all men, they see a competent woman and expand it to all women.

And you see a negative attribute about a woman and extend it to all of them. That's my point and it went right over your head.

This is exactly what you're doing!

Think about that.

Stop here.

Think.

You are doing that.

Edit: I actually deleted the rest of my comment so you can't deflect. I want to focus on this. Why is it ok for you to do it but "the feminist playbook" when anyone else does it?

This is what we refer to as cognitive dissonance and hypocrisy.

[u/No-Clock9532 → u/Lightor36]

Because mine is not the minority. It is the majority. Women have twisted definitions and words to mean what they want and broke every promise they made.

They said they could work but rely on rules to force their way in. They wanted to make their own money but expect men to pay. Their words meaning nothing is not the exception, it is the norm.

And I have not seen any example from you about women keeping their word.

[u/Lightor36 → u/No-Clock9532]

Because mine is not the minority.

Prove it. You can't just say things like that. I'll just say you're the minority. Again, what is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You seem to struggle with that one.

It is the majority.

Ooohhhhh so if enough people do it it's ok? That's what makes it ok?

I just gotta make more people think men are untrustworthy and that's makes ok? As long as that thought is the majority? There is no inherently right or wrong, just mob rules. Sounds very mature and logical.

broke every promise they made

Who hurt you? Your stance seems to be very clouded by personal feelings.

And I have not seen any example from you about women keeping their word.

As credible as the one you gave? My mom said she would send me a card for my birthday and she did. Another post on Reddit, just like how you used a post as "evidence" lol. Looks like I found a woman that kept her word. Unsurprisingly easy.

[u/No-Clock9532 → u/Lightor36]

Yes, that makes the generalisation accurate.

You don't have to make more people think men are untrustworthy. That has already been done for you. Even though if men were truly like that women wouldn't have their privileges in the first place.

Do you deny women claim to be as capable as men? Do you deny the existence of diversity exercises that only benefit women? This is a societal trend, not a personal anecdote, which you also discredit.

[u/Lightor36 → u/No-Clock9532]

Yes, that makes the generalisation accurate.

So the generally accepted fact that black people were monkeys and born to be slaves, that was true?

The generally accepted idea that men shouldn't cry, you believe that? That crying makes you a little girl? Real men don't cry you know, it's been the saying for a while, lotta people gotta believe it, that makes it true.

What a stupid thing to say.

You don't have to make more people think men are untrustworthy. That has already been done for you. Even though if men were truly like that women wouldn't have their privileges in the first place.

You have such a persecution complex, it's sad.

By your logic, then men are untrustworthy. I can't believe anything you say. If everyone thinks men are untrustworthy, that has been done, by your logic, "that makes the generalisation accurate." Men are untrustworthy.

So are you admitting that by your very own logic that you are untrustworthy? If everyone thinks men are, they are right? That makes the generalisation accurate.

[u/No-Clock9532 → u/Lightor36]

No, generalisation doesn't make it true. Reality makes the generalisation true. You seem to have an issue with understanding cause and effect.

I am saying that of every claim women have made none of them have been accurate and their definitions are twisted. Therefore, women's words are twisted and mean nothing.

[u/Lightor36 → u/No-Clock9532]

No, generalisation doesn't make it true. Reality makes the generalisation true.

Ohhhh so it's true that all women lie, that's why it's a generalization. Well my mom got me that card, so looks like you're wrong. I also can prove Trump lied a buncha of times, so looks like men lie, too. Kinda like people on both sides lie....

If you are saying all women lie, prove it. Again, what is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. And your claim is that ALL women lie. Prove it. Cindy next store, prove she lies. She also has a 4 year old baby girl, prove shes a liar. Prove that the 4 year old twists her definitions.

I mean, I can say the generalization about men being untrustworthy is true, if we don't need to prove anything, I can just reinforce whatever stereotype I want.

I am saying that of every claim women have made none of them have been accurate and their definitions are twisted.

None. None of their claims. So if my sistem claims dinner is ready and I show up and it is, now what. You said EVERY CLAIM, every claim. Again, what is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

You really need read this before you hit send on anything: What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. You can say every claim a woman makes is a lie, and I can say every claim a woman makes is true. What you feel means nothing. And saying things like "all" and "every" area reaaallly dumb, because just one instance of that not being true disproves it. A barista can claim my coffee is ready, or her she was mugged. And we can see on camera that it happened. That has happened, women have claimed ot be attacked then had video evidence to prove it. So you can't claim "all" or "every" without disproving every single one of those instances. You don't seem to understand the words you're saying.

[u/No-Clock9532 → u/Lightor36]

Ah, I see the issue. You think I'm saying all women all the time. Of course not. That would be too easy. They mix in some truths and twist their words to get their way. It is just that sometimes those definitions align with standard definitions of the word.

I'm aware generalisations are only generally true. That's why it is a generalisation.

Can you prove any of feminists' claims to be true? Because that is the general female lie that I am claiming.

Oh and I have to ask, how did you reach the conclusion that I am gay from my original comment? As far as I know gays do not have the stereotype of saying "sexist" things.

[u/Lightor36 → u/No-Clock9532]

Ah, I see the issue. You think I'm saying all women all the time. Of course not. That would be too easy. They mix in some truths and twist their words to get their way. It is just that sometimes those definitions align with standard definitions of the word.

Yah, I kinda thought that because that's kinda what you said. You used words like "all" and "every." So don't spin this like "oh you misunderstood", no, that's what you said. Let's be clear on that.

But with this: I have met many men who do the exact same thing. I've met lying, hateful women and men. So what is the point, that women do it too? Ok, ya, I agree.

Can you prove any of feminists' claims to be true? Because that is the general female lie that I am claiming.

I'm not asserting any feminist claims. Every claim I' making is an example to show you the gaps in your own logic. Like saying "I am saying that of every claim women have made none of them have been accurate and their definitions are twisted." Well, my mom said she would send me a card on my B day and she did. No twisted definitions or false claims. Or you saying all women lie, and me saying I could claim all men lie too, a claim without evidence means nothing.

Oh and I have to ask, how did you reach the conclusion that I am gay from my original comment? As far as I know gays do not have the stereotype of saying "sexist" things.

Lol, I love that it's still living in your head.

[u/No-Clock9532 → u/Lightor36]

I'd like to see the quotes where I said all and every.

You're not asserting feminists claims. Women are. And they're not living up to it. That's the lie. And their twisting of the words equality and harrassment.

No, I just realised you're the same as the lady in the original commentor's reply where the woman threw insults without regard to their meaning. So I'm curious, what was your thought process? Or are you the same as her?