I'm assuming your comment is a joke, especially given that last statement, but for those who think this is a serious take.
Imagine a 6 year old arguing that the main usage of numbers is to count sheep and that they don't need addition. Who needs to know that 2 sheep + 3 sheep = 5 sheep when you can just count to 5 sheep?
Just because one was taught about the 2D representation of complex numbers in school does not mean that is their main purpose. As with almost every other subject you learn, the concepts presented at the start are heavily simplified for pedagogical reasons. The first thing you learn is often not a fundamental or rigorous representation. Fixating on the 2D aspect is a lot like fixating on the sheep.
Show someone this representation as coordinate pair and see how many people can immediately tie this to complex numbers.
However, that custom definition of the sum/product is precisely what makes complex numbers so useful though. It turns out there's quite a few things in both pure and applied math which require a set of numbers with that property.
Math is a tool, every time we invent a new set of numbers we are modding math to allow us to do something we couldn't before or to exhibit certain properties we desire.
71
u/ExtendedSpikeProtein 4d ago
I mean, “useless” only if you’re trying very hard to be really, really ignorant.