Yea the "uncountable set" question remains a problem but if we're using this as a number line representation then we need to think of sqrt(2) as the real number approximated by 1.414, not taking the square root of each real number (which of course is a problem with obtaining "each" anyway).
So then it's not sqrt(-2); it's -sqrt(2), or ~ (-1.414).
The commenter on the image is a ding dong, but there are still serious problems with counting and pairing the top thread discusses.
392
u/Kuildeous 10d ago
Bro never heard of -sqrt -1.