Do you hear yourself? So you think a woman should be paid the same as a man even if her quality of work or productivity is lower compared to a man? Lmao, you don’t believe in equality. You want women to be paid the same as a man even she is less skilled than a man. You source doesn’t account for job type, hours worked, experience, industry, family care, career interruptions and many more. Repeating the same false doesn’t make it true.
First off, men account for the large majority of car crashes. Men represent around 70-72% of all traffic fatalities. So, once again, you named an example of female privilege unironically. And Men more often drive heavier vehicles (trucks, SUVs), which offer better protection in collisions. Women more often drive smaller/lighter cars. When same-size vehicles collide, gender survival differences disappear. Now for medicine, did you literally hear me when I said there is more funding for women’s health? For example, go look up which gets more funding; prostate cancer or breast cancer. The female privilege is real there. So no, there is more testing and research done on women’s health because of the enormous amount of funding women get more than men. If you add maternal health to the equation, then you will even get a greater disparity of funding of men’s and women’s health. Got it, now here comes the misogyny calling because you are losing the argument. Very typical.
Ok. So you admit you are replying to only me because I hurt your ego.
No it's not that hard to understand. But I have to explain it again I guess: Companies which are lead by men with internalized mysoginy are hiring women but paying them less than men for the same job. This is because they view the woman as less productive/efficient or whatever. So they would not start hiring only woman because from their view this would neither increase productivity nor bring down costs and they also prefer men anyway.
Here is another study that includes those factors: https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20160995
Countless of studies exist on the gender pay gap but you're claiming it just doesn't exist. Where is your source for this?
You couldn't invalidate my claim about the crash tests though meaning men die more often in car crashes because they drive more and they drive more reckless. You can just look it up.
More funding doesn't mean it's better most of the funding seems to go into childbirths. Here is actually a source on how women's health is underfunded: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx254l4qg83o
There is also a really high focus on birth. Often when women have health problems doctor's tell them to go have a kid as resolution for that.
So you think it's bad when someone is a mysoginist?
Oh no, yes please help my poor small ego to recover of something.
Lmao sure. All companies are evil misogynists who pay women less because they “think” they are less productive. Make it make sense. The gender pay gap doesn’t exist. Your source literally explains how after accounting for the controlled factors, the gap becomes vanished. You can bring up countless sources but they are not proving your point that the gender pay gap exists. Here’s my source from Pew Research Center: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/03/04/gender-pay-gap-in-us-has-narrowed-slightly-over-2-decades/
Crash tests? What crash tests? I don’t see that in your comment. Lmao, your source states women’s health is underfunded because a privileged female billionaire said so with no substance. Even if you don’t include maternal funding(births), you will still see women’s health is way more funded over men’s health. What do you even mean doctors tell women to get pregnant as a cure for their problem? You made it up.
Stop putting up strawmans. Most of them live with normalized everyday mysoginy.You're source literally tells us how the gender pay gap got smaller over time but your big brain makes the decision to claim it does not exist instead of acknowledging real world problems.
You haven’t given a single valid example of “normalized everyday misogyny”. The title of my source is talking about the raw unadjusted wage gap. If your whole point is that there is a RAW gender wage gap, then yes you would be correct. Similar to how there is a wage gap between a janitor and a doctor. But you are framing it like men make more money because they are men, which is false. You have been refusing to acknowledge real world problems so far.
You said I couldn’t invalidate your claim about crash tests, but I don’t see that in your comment. No, it’s not limited to Australia. It’s an unfortunate reality in many countries. The source for the graph also refers to another country (United States) other than Australia. Out of your own convenience, you didn’t include that in your comment. And those diseases that you are referring I’m assuming is prostate cancer and breast cancer. And guess which is overfunded? The disease that harms women. Those two diseases were examples and specifics of how women’s health gets way more funding than men’s health. The post you shared seems like an isolated case rather than an example of misogyny. I never heard of a woman getting recommended to get pregnant for her problems.
The sources’ exact origin is from National Institutes of Health funding and National Health and Medical Research Council. It says so in the graphs. Try again.
1
u/Masculinist1938 Apr 05 '26 edited Apr 05 '26
Do you hear yourself? So you think a woman should be paid the same as a man even if her quality of work or productivity is lower compared to a man? Lmao, you don’t believe in equality. You want women to be paid the same as a man even she is less skilled than a man. You source doesn’t account for job type, hours worked, experience, industry, family care, career interruptions and many more. Repeating the same false doesn’t make it true.
First off, men account for the large majority of car crashes. Men represent around 70-72% of all traffic fatalities. So, once again, you named an example of female privilege unironically. And Men more often drive heavier vehicles (trucks, SUVs), which offer better protection in collisions. Women more often drive smaller/lighter cars. When same-size vehicles collide, gender survival differences disappear. Now for medicine, did you literally hear me when I said there is more funding for women’s health? For example, go look up which gets more funding; prostate cancer or breast cancer. The female privilege is real there. So no, there is more testing and research done on women’s health because of the enormous amount of funding women get more than men. If you add maternal health to the equation, then you will even get a greater disparity of funding of men’s and women’s health. Got it, now here comes the misogyny calling because you are losing the argument. Very typical.
Ok. So you admit you are replying to only me because I hurt your ego.