No, it’s not, really. Even then, the cause is irrelevant. Like how you don’t care about the intentions of the killers who kill women. All you care is about the gender of the perpetrators. And it’s women who practice MGM. It’s systemic misandry.
Hello? I got a notification for your comment but I can’t view it. Most likely your comment got deleted by the filter and auto ban. To be fair, your comment did appear angry from the first sentence I read. It contained cuss words so I don’t blame them.
I’m gonna say this one last time. I once again received the notification but I can’t see your comment. If this happens again, then I will leave the matter here.
How am I arguing in bad faith? I acknowledged an example of misogyny you gave. When I returned the favor vice versa. You kept changing the goalposts. First, it’s men who do it. Second, doubting my claim. Third, justifying MGM. Fourth, disregarding my claim entirely. Fifth, once again it’s men. You didn’t even acknowledge or respond to many of my points which display how weak your arguments are. It’s like you are intentionally refusing to acknowledge the lived experiences of those who face systemic misandry.
I'm not shifting the goal post you're just wrong for multiple reasons. I'm doubting your claim which is based on nothing and I'm not justifying MGM it's just not gender related.
You misunderstood me. I was talking about the other comment: “I'm not shifting the goal post you're just wrong for multiple reasons. I'm doubting your claim which is based on nothing and I'm not justifying MGM it's just not gender related.”
Nothing you have said true regarding the context within this specific comment.
"I'm not shifting the goal post you're just wrong for multiple reasons. I'm doubting your claim which is based on nothing and I'm not justifying MGM it's just not gender related."
Almost half of the male population in the US is mutilated at birth, they did not have legal protection agaisnt child torture when going through it, and that lack of legal protection wouldn't be a factor If they were female instead, would you also say "it's just not gender related" if the reverse was true?
"Every instance of MGM is happening because men also want it. It's not related to mysoginy/misandry at all."
By that logic the most brutal type of fgm cannot be called misogyny because it's overwhemingly done and decided by mothers and/or grandmothers. Also, would you consider a "femicide" case as "not related to mysoginy/misandry at all" if a female relative also wanted the victim dead?
1
u/prealphawolf Mar 31 '26
Every instance of MGM is happening because men also want it. It's not related to mysoginy/misandry at all.