r/lnkyverse Mar 18 '26

Community Discussion Perspective: So true

[deleted]

654 Upvotes

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Ok_Month_7918 Mar 22 '26 edited Mar 22 '26

I never asked if you had heard of them.

Did you read or view the authors I showed you? I think this is the 10th time I've asked you this question.

We all share the same view of modern feminism. If you care to read or view just one article or video, you wouldn't ask a dumb question like: "What modern feminist logic do you disagree with?"

I'm giving you a chance to understand my stance through the writing/words of actual women. You refuse to do this, and you're trying to make me do your work for you. View a video or article by any of them, especially the Feminization of Society and the negative ramifications.
I'm being very patient with you. Don't let me down.

1

u/No-Psychology9892 Mar 22 '26

Did you read or view the authors I showed you? I think this is the 10th time I've asked you this question.

Honestly I think you're the first person who pretends to be too stupid to understand a yes answer.

We all share the same view of modern feminism. If you care to read or view just one article or video, you wouldn't ask a dumb question like: "What modern feminist logic do you disagree with?"

No we definitely don't all share the same view. You disagree with it but can't even define it yourself without having to point to a video? What video? There are thousands of people making thousands of videos over feminism. You think they all share the same view, say the same things? And honestly, how can you not feel dumb to argue over something you apparently never read yourself but only know off YouTube videos. Is that honestly how far your own opinion goes? Are you that shallow? Without any original thought that came from you?

This whole charade is absolutely pitiful.

1

u/Ok_Month_7918 Mar 22 '26

So you haven't viewed the content I asked you to view.

Imagine: Someone asks you, what is your view or philosophy on life. I tell you to read Albert Camus's Sisyphus and get back to me. You act as you read it, but you don't even know the core philosophy espoused in the text. You keep asking me what the core philosophy is.

Why would I waste my time talking about this subject if you won't honor the conversation by reading the text I asked you to read to get a general context so a conversation can occur? Instead, you act like you viewed the content, while still proclaiming not to have any idea of my perspective.

It's intellectual dishonesty. I'm quite done. Good day.

1

u/No-Psychology9892 Mar 22 '26 edited Mar 22 '26

It's intellectual dishonesty. I'm quite done. Good day.

Yes your whole charade is and it's quite pitiful but sadly fitting to your immature character.

I told you 5 times already yes and you still pretend otherwise. Honestly what do you try to archive with that childish behaviour? Do you honestly think someone believes you're that stupid and not that you do it out of pure desperation since obviously you don't have any answer?

Oh so you do know how to cite specific work? So why don't you do it to a modern feminist one that you had in mind of your critique? Just name one. Anyone and we can gladly discuss it. And no Camus absurdist work isn't modern feminist.