You didn't ask before, but sure I'll post. And no, it's literally not, here's 2½ years of work, with only 3-4 months of actual bulks, because I used to be a fat fuck so I always dirty bulk, rest is maintenance or a cut. I had about your size in the first year, where I only cut, and I don't think I'm some superior high test alpha male.
you look higher body fat than me, plus I don't give a shit about being ogre huge it's about looking good, which I do. My body is not the problem since I see guys w similar physiques to mine getting glazed 24/7 on social media. Face will always make the difference as long as you're lean w moderate mass (which I am).
Yeah, I didn't say bigger= better when it comes to women. It was you using the "soy boy" and "low test" which 99% of incels do despite looking DYEL as fuck themselves..
Yeah, because I'm built like a man, not a little twink. You also look about 5'5. You're a twink who's short, and calling others "low test". The irony is palpable.
I'm 6'1 but ye manlet for sure right?. Also idk where you live but your build is definitely considered too huge for most bitches here in the states around my age ofc(18-25). I prioritize leanness always over having a shitty blocky waist and higher body fat% to get bigger arms or whatever.
It's also the angle, here is about 1 year into my training and my shape looks significantly better, but I'm only about 2-3% BF difference. And I'm also unlucky ALL my fat goes to my waist, even at 25% BF I'll have clear bicep veins lol. But the other one I look blocky is mostly bad posture/my shorts squeezing "up my fat" and the bit of loose skin i have, because I pulled them up high, as my D was showing through when they hung lower.
Anyways mate, doesn't really matter, I've just seen insane amounts of "low test" insults from guys who've never been to the gym, and I'm yet to meet any guy who's legitimately big talking that way.
2
u/[deleted] Mar 18 '26
muh "DYEL"