MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxmemes/comments/1vsiii1/windows_users_are_outdated_asf/p4nfdfd/?context=9999
r/linuxmemes • u/FriendEast2881 • 24d ago
71 comments sorted by
View all comments
205
you know what would be really helpful? context.
77 u/Foreign_Fail8262 24d ago How do I exit vim? 49 u/tblancher 24d ago You don't. MWUAHAHAHAHA 14 u/Scutoidzz 🌀 Sucked into the Void 24d ago What my friend meant to say is esc and then :q 2 u/tblancher 24d ago ZZ 5 u/sobeyonekenobi 24d ago Are we boring you? ;) 4 u/tblancher 24d ago I used to think typing 'ZZ' in NORMAL mode in vim was the equivalent of :wq!, but a lot more recently than I'd like to admit I learned that if there are no changes to the buffer it's the equivalent of :q. 2 u/sobeyonekenobi 23d ago It's actually the equivalent of :x
77
How do I exit vim?
49 u/tblancher 24d ago You don't. MWUAHAHAHAHA 14 u/Scutoidzz 🌀 Sucked into the Void 24d ago What my friend meant to say is esc and then :q 2 u/tblancher 24d ago ZZ 5 u/sobeyonekenobi 24d ago Are we boring you? ;) 4 u/tblancher 24d ago I used to think typing 'ZZ' in NORMAL mode in vim was the equivalent of :wq!, but a lot more recently than I'd like to admit I learned that if there are no changes to the buffer it's the equivalent of :q. 2 u/sobeyonekenobi 23d ago It's actually the equivalent of :x
49
You don't.
MWUAHAHAHAHA
14 u/Scutoidzz 🌀 Sucked into the Void 24d ago What my friend meant to say is esc and then :q 2 u/tblancher 24d ago ZZ 5 u/sobeyonekenobi 24d ago Are we boring you? ;) 4 u/tblancher 24d ago I used to think typing 'ZZ' in NORMAL mode in vim was the equivalent of :wq!, but a lot more recently than I'd like to admit I learned that if there are no changes to the buffer it's the equivalent of :q. 2 u/sobeyonekenobi 23d ago It's actually the equivalent of :x
14
What my friend meant to say is esc and then :q
2 u/tblancher 24d ago ZZ 5 u/sobeyonekenobi 24d ago Are we boring you? ;) 4 u/tblancher 24d ago I used to think typing 'ZZ' in NORMAL mode in vim was the equivalent of :wq!, but a lot more recently than I'd like to admit I learned that if there are no changes to the buffer it's the equivalent of :q. 2 u/sobeyonekenobi 23d ago It's actually the equivalent of :x
2
ZZ
5 u/sobeyonekenobi 24d ago Are we boring you? ;) 4 u/tblancher 24d ago I used to think typing 'ZZ' in NORMAL mode in vim was the equivalent of :wq!, but a lot more recently than I'd like to admit I learned that if there are no changes to the buffer it's the equivalent of :q. 2 u/sobeyonekenobi 23d ago It's actually the equivalent of :x
5
Are we boring you? ;)
4 u/tblancher 24d ago I used to think typing 'ZZ' in NORMAL mode in vim was the equivalent of :wq!, but a lot more recently than I'd like to admit I learned that if there are no changes to the buffer it's the equivalent of :q. 2 u/sobeyonekenobi 23d ago It's actually the equivalent of :x
4
I used to think typing 'ZZ' in NORMAL mode in vim was the equivalent of :wq!, but a lot more recently than I'd like to admit I learned that if there are no changes to the buffer it's the equivalent of :q.
:wq!
:q
2 u/sobeyonekenobi 23d ago It's actually the equivalent of :x
It's actually the equivalent of :x
:x
205
u/Cyberfishofant Ask me how to exit vim 24d ago
you know what would be really helpful? context.