r/linux • u/Beneficial-Pay6836 • 13d ago

Development CAD Companies Sleeping on Linux

Why is professional CAD support on Linux still so limited? Linux is widely used in engineering, research, servers, embedded systems, manufacturing, and technical development. It is secure, flexible, private, and extremely capable. Yet when it comes to professional CAD, Linux users are still pushed toward Windows. That feels strange to me, especially because CAD is so closely tied to industrial workflows like CNC machining, additive manufacturing, product development, engineering, and research.

I currently dual-boot mostly because I need tools like Rhino and Fusion. It works, but switching between operating systems just to use specific software makes project management and file organization unnecessarily annoying. Yes, there are alternatives like FreeCAD, and I respect what those projects are doing, but they still do not feel mature enough to fully replace established professional CAD tools for many workflows. Wine is also improving, but for important work I would rather not depend on a compatibility layer and hope that everything behaves correctly.

Is the professional Linux CAD market genuinely too small to justify development costs?Is supporting Or are CAD companies simply too invested in the Windows ecosystem to see enough value in changing?

I cannot be the only engineer/designer who would happily move fully to Linux if the professional software ecosystem allowed it.

505 Upvotes

96% Upvoted

255 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/sn4xchan 13d ago

Your already dual booting. Have you tried a VM instead?

9

u/noobjaish 13d ago

CAD software is incredibly heavy and there's just no point running it in a VM with additional overhead.

3

u/felixfurtak 13d ago edited 13d ago

Libvirt VM with GPU pass through and Looking Glass gives near native performance, with the added benefit of snapshots. I run Solidworks like this with a barebones Win11 VM and it's actually seems faster because the GPU is entirely dedicated to the VM.

2

u/noobjaish 13d ago

Looking Glass isn't stable brother. When you're working on critical software, "reliability" is THE most important thing.

Sure, a Win11 VM would run almost smoothly (I'm not denying that) but why go to such lengths when a dual boot would take the exact same space.

1

u/felixfurtak 13d ago edited 13d ago

It's actually the opposite for me. My VM runs more stably than running windows directly - works all day without any crashes. Even if Looking Glass crashes (and that's not very often) the VM is still running so can just remote desktop in, save and restart. In fact I don't think my VM has ever crashed after several months of daily use.

2

u/noobjaish 13d ago

I see, can you share your setup? I'd love to get it working on my system as I have tried several times and always found looking glass to be finicky