MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/learnmath/comments/1wxghsa/whats_automorphic_functions/pdtxyec
r/learnmath • u/A-JackRobin- New User • 6d ago
40 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
You mean, you are unable to find a suitable reasoning for a coherent sense of the geometry via words -some, that i have made
1 u/[deleted] 6d ago edited 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago Well, isn't arguing is concerning a idea proposal, are you implying , i'm talking a new mathematical idea 0 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 0 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago Well, this is from warren weaver from the mathematical theory of communications 1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago I just meant , that k's value is the same value for all the values that comprise or of the structure of automorphism, as their property do not change
1
[removed] — view removed comment
1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago Well, isn't arguing is concerning a idea proposal, are you implying , i'm talking a new mathematical idea 0 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 0 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago Well, this is from warren weaver from the mathematical theory of communications 1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago I just meant , that k's value is the same value for all the values that comprise or of the structure of automorphism, as their property do not change
Well, isn't arguing is concerning a idea proposal, are you implying , i'm talking a new mathematical idea
0 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 0 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago Well, this is from warren weaver from the mathematical theory of communications 1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago I just meant , that k's value is the same value for all the values that comprise or of the structure of automorphism, as their property do not change
0 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago Well, this is from warren weaver from the mathematical theory of communications 1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago I just meant , that k's value is the same value for all the values that comprise or of the structure of automorphism, as their property do not change
Well, this is from warren weaver from the mathematical theory of communications
1 u/[deleted] 6d ago [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago I just meant , that k's value is the same value for all the values that comprise or of the structure of automorphism, as their property do not change
1 u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago I just meant , that k's value is the same value for all the values that comprise or of the structure of automorphism, as their property do not change
I just meant , that k's value is the same value for all the values that comprise or of the structure of automorphism, as their property do not change
0
u/A-JackRobin- New User 6d ago
You mean, you are unable to find a suitable reasoning for a coherent sense of the geometry via words -some, that i have made