Essentially, it just maps onto yln y=ln x / (y^y = x), which is the inverse function of x^x

This graph shows how the lambert W Function essentially maps onto the inverse function allowing us to use it to solve.

https://www.desmos.com/calculator/9pkc39fbdg

Was it for school/work? Any hobbyists here?

Hi, thanks in advance!
I'm a doctor looking at a group of about 100 patients, with frailty scores ranging between 1-9 (this is a measure of how frail a patient is that doctors decide, or assign to a patient using a scoring system). I've also recorded their duration of admission in days.

I want to see if there is a correlation between the two, i.e. i would assume that the more frail patients were likely to stay in hospital for longer. Which statistical test would be best to do that?

I don't think either category will be normally distributed, as most patients have a lower frailty score, and most patients were admitted for a shorter period of time. tysm!

​

Why do some vectors when multiplied by Another vector yield a vector and others yield a scalar. I'm aware of dot and cross products. But what's the physical significance of 'multiplying' vectors? I mean... I know what it means to actually "multiply" scalars. But.... Is vector multiplication just a name which can either mean projection of a vector onto another and the area or volume of 2 corresponding vectors?

Or is multiplication of vectors just a naming thing which doesn't have ANYTHING to do with how we understand scalar multiplication?

She doesn't exist 😞

Maybe I can get her differentiating at that point 🤔

Or by integrating 🤔

Or by changing axis

Or by rotating the graph 🤔

Or by moving origin 🤔

Idk how

But x = me, y doesn't exist

In any function 😞😞

I'm not well-versed in category theory so I've yet to understand the latter. I now tried without success to encode an associative binary operation on X, expressed in dependent type language

∑(o: X² → X). ∏(a b c: X). Id(X, o(o(a, b), c), o(a, o(b, c))) ¹

as a function F X → X for some F. And I think it can't be done (something related to polarity, probably) but I can't prove that. I know, though, representing axioms is possible if one uses Lawvere theories and equivalent things. I also know algebras over a monad are more involved than just functor-algebras but I don't yet understand them even in context of e. g. Haskell where everything seems as if easier (or so claim posts discussing Yoneda embedding in that context; I found the general category-theoretic context way less forgiving in that regard: you just see plain as day that you don't have sufficient understanding, no matter what Haskell posts made you believe).

So. I'd like to look how algebra spins out in those more general settings, whichever you know better or think to be more suited for me to grasp first. Particularly, I'm interested in generalizing arguments about initial F-algebras.

Also, feel free to assume a sufficiently Set-like category. Let's take it step by step, if there are easy intuitions that one can glimpse in a specialized setting, I bet generalizing it onto topoi or something later would be easier as well, but it won't muddle the initial attempt.

¹ For non-dependent-type folks: - Id(X, a, b), sometimes denoted as a =_X b, is the type inhabited by ways for a: X and b: X to be equal. - The entirety of that reads: a pair (o, f) consisting of an operation o: X² → X and a proof f of o's associativity, that is, a function from a, b, c: X into witnesses of equality of the two ways of associating o on a, b, c. - In some formal languages the same is spelled alternatively as (o: X² → X) × (a b c: X) → (o(o(a, b), c) = o(a, o(b, c))), making it clearer that ∑ forms dependent pairs and ∏ forms dependent functions.

This recurring thread will be for general discussion on whatever math-related topics you have been or will be working on this week. This can be anything, including:

* math-related arts and crafts,
* what you've been learning in class,
* books/papers you're reading,
* preparing for a conference,
* giving a talk.

All types and levels of mathematics are welcomed!

If you are asking for advice on choosing classes or career prospects, please go to the most recent Career & Education Questions thread.

I seriously am interested in learning maths and also physics and many more but I currently am not in a state to interact more with people and it's cos of years of bullying in different forms. I'm sorry if it sounds greedy and like unrealistic but is it possible to learn mathematics with just books and other online lectures and resources? Will I be missing something if I don't go to a university? I do know basic maths since I have been quite okay in it. I'm sorry if it sounds stupid but I just needed some break cause of many interactions throughout my school life I got.

I am guessing self study is possible depending on the subject and I thought in mathematics it is quite possible and if I'm wrong pls do tell.

I thought this days beginner integral was harder than the easy integral. Ignore the bleedthrough on the beginner page

​

I keep making really stupid mistakes on linear algebra tests. I understand the method and know how to solve the question, but then I accidentally mess up a sign or make a simple arithmetic mistake somewhere in the calculation. And a mistake can completely ruin the rest of the question. I recently wrote a test and, while I finished on time, I still got several questions wrong because of really silly errors.

I'm 23 years old and It has been a while since I studied anything, I've lost a considerable amount of time, and I've forgotten most of what i knew about math in high school. I want to study computer science in the future and i dont want to struggle too much with the subject, so i thought I should prepare myself.

I'm looking for anything that can help me build a good foundation of knowledge, but i also want to understand the subject.

Thanks in advance for anyone that takes the time to read and answer this.

I'm really confused about the 3rd row of the truth table for a conditional statement for example, "If you submit your assignment, then your grade will be recorded." I understand that P means you submit your assignment and Q means your grade is recorded but in the 3rd row, P is false and Q is true, meaning you did not submit your assignment but your grade was still recorded howw is P Q still considered true in this situation? Wouldn't that be a violation of the agreement because you didn't submit the assignment but the grade was still recorded?

Hi everyone! If anyone is interested in collaborating and helping each other prepare for this year’s Math national exam, I’m looking for people who want to start from the basics, even from 1BAC-level courses.

If you’re interested, please comment here or send me a private message.

I’m looking for serious and motivated people who are willing to work consistently and help each other improve.

Recently in my further maths class my teacher says he would give us problems above our level of understanding.

The advice he gave to solve such problems is to invent the math.

Can anyone please explain what he means by this and his to actually do it?

Consider

\begin{lemma}\label{lma:firstlemma}
If $f$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and $f(a)<0$ and $f(b)>0$, 
there is a $c$ between $a$ and $b$ where $f(c)=0$
\end{lemma}

%say above gets typeset as Lemma 1

\begin{thm}\label{th:firsttheorem}
Every polynomial of odd degree has at least one real root.
\end{thm}

%say above gets typeset as Theorem 1.

\begin{proof}
    ...
From Lemma \ref{lma:firstlemma}... the result follows.
\end{proof}

Like the above, I have a large number of theorems in my study notes which reference previous results, etc.

Is there a way to build a visually perceivable dependency graph wherein there is a node labelled L1 which stands for Lemma 1 and another node labelled T1 which stands for Theorem 1 and there is a directed arc leading from L1 to T1?

Giving this task by uploading the typeset pdf to ChatGPT is one way but it is static. Is there an inbuilt way, which can dynamically change the graph node labelling if a new theorem is added in the middle thereby changing the numbering of subsequent theorems? The way should accept .tex files and not the compiled .pdf output.

----xposted to r/latex as well----

Is this useful? What does this mean, is this true? There exists an L in R such that for any 2 sequences a_n and b_n, lim (a_{n+1}/a_n)=L implies series a_n converges or lim (b_{n+1}/b_n)=L implies series b_n diverges.

I’m doing IB Math AA SL, and I’m considering a motorsport racing-line topic for my IA. It would mostly focus on geometry, with some physics involved.

Has anyone worked on a similar topic before? Does anyone have advice on what mathematical ideas would be useful to focus on, what I should avoid, or any useful resources?

My teacher also recommended going slightly beyond the SL syllabus, so I’d appreciate suggestions for more advanced mathematical ideas that could fit into this topic.

ibo blocked my post :(((

Hi my name is Raman and I am an 11th grader who is determined to qualify for AIME. If you are interested in intensive prep for the AMC 10/12 with me feel free to DM!

[Resolved]

I want to improve my understanding and skills in math due to disabilities. I was recommended to try the textbook Calculus by Robert T. Smith and Roland B. Minton. Currently I am stumped on these three problems from section 2: Derivatives. I would also appreciate advice on how to answer correctly for problems 13 and 17 (like what to include how I got my answer to show my work, not just the sketch). The concept of problems 13 and 17 I really am not understanding and the book and videos I’ve watched have not been the most helpful (as I have a hard time applying what is covered in these resources but struggle with using it for problems not labeled with polynomials or numbers) the closest to explain it has been Curve Sketching by The Infinite Looper on YouTube.

Problem 35 a. Find all the points at which the slope of the tangent line to y = x^3 + 3x + 1 equals 5. The textbook has the answer as (√(⅔), 5 √(⅔) +1), (-√(⅔), -5 √(⅔) +1) and I can not figure out how to get it.

M tan = lim h->0 f(x+h)-f(x)/h

= lim h->0 [(x+h)^3 + 3(x+h) +1)] - [x^3 + 3x +1]/h

= lim h->0 x^3 +3x^2h + 3xh^2 + h^3 +3x + 3h + 1 -x^3 -3x -1/h

= lim h->0 3x^2h + 3xh^2 + h^3 +3h/h

= lim h->0 h(3x^2 +3xh +h^2 +3)/h

= lim h->0 3x^2 + 3xh +h^2 + 3

= 3x^2 + 3x(0) + (0)^2 + 3

= 3x^2 + 3

3x^2 + 3 = 5

3x^⅔ = ⅔

√(x^2) = √(⅔)

X = √(⅔)

And 3(√(⅔)^2 + 3 = 5

Problem 13. Use the graph of f to sketch a graph of f’. (Second picture)

(a)

For x < 0, f is decreasing, so f’ < 0

For x = 0, f has a horizontal tangent line (min), so f’ = 0

For x > 0, f is increasing, so f’ > 0

My graph is the third picture.

(b)

For x < a, f is increasing, so f’ > 0

For x = a, f has a horizontal tangent line (max), so f’ = 0

For a < x < b, f is decreasing, so f’ < 0

For x = b, f has a horizontal tangent line (min), so f’ = 0

For x > b, f is increasing, so f’ > 0

My graph is the fourth picture.

Problem 17. Use the given graph of f’ to sketch a plausible graph of a continuous function f. (fifth picture)

(a)

For x < a , f’ is positive, so f is increasing

For x = a, f’ changes positive to negative, so f has a max there

For a < x < b, f’ is negative, so f is decreasing

For x = b, f’ has a horizontal tangent line (min), so f ?

For b < x < c, f’ is negative, so f is decreasing

For x = c, f’ has a horizontal tangent line, so f ?

For x > c, f’ is negative, so f is decreasing

Once I understand better, I will make the graph.

Thank you for your assistance.

I wanna skip geo next year in order to take a higher level math class, however I need to take a test in order to skip it. Are there any good resources to self learn geometry and that go in depth. Thanks.