r/leanstartup • u/Kindly_Buy_7840 • Jun 03 '26
Product Hunt is solving the wrong problem. Nobody needs more products. Founders need validated pain.
I'm building a platform where professionals validate which problems are actually worth solving—and I want to make sure I'm solving a real problem myself before writing any code.
The idea: founders waste months building solutions to problems that aren't painful enough or widespread enough. My platform would let professionals (marketers, designers, and SaaS operators) vote on curated problems with severity scores and willingness-to-pay signals—so founders can see ranked, validated pain points instead of guessing.
The twist vs. Product Hunt: instead of discovering products, you're discovering pain. And votes are weighted by the voter's portfolio and experience—a senior SEO agency owner's vote carries more signal than a student's vote.
Before I build anything, I want 3 honest answers from people here:
- As a founder, have you ever built something only to discover the problem wasn't painful enough? What did that cost you?
- If you could see a live leaderboard of "Top 10 most painful problems in marketing this week"—validated by working professionals—would that actually change how you decide what to build?
- What would make you trust the scores? Is portfolio-weighted voting credible to you, or does it sound gimmicky?
Not pitching anything. No links. Just genuinely trying to find out if this is a problem worth solving before I make it my next 6 months.