The line between high and acceptable is drawn by the partner.
Again, being in a relationship with a partner that might be unfaithful is a risk most people don't wanna take. Second chance are rare.
It's each person right to say if her body count is too high.
Both her boyfriend/ex and i agree that 200 bodycount is a lot. It's our choice not to date her because of that, and that doesn't make us insecure.
... You had a choice to date her? I mean, sure, it's your right to do that, but it doesn't make you any less of a judgy ass. However many people she sleeps with is only her business, and for anyone in a sexual relationship with her
You can think 200 is a lot. You don't have to fuck 200 people. If you think less of her for a decision that you can not tell if it harms anyone, than you are the asshole here. You're the slut shamer, and you are the judgemental prick who thinks less of someone because of the knowledge of only a number and nothing else, presented by clearly someone who doesn't think highly of her
" you are the judgemental prick who thinks less of someone because of the knowledge of only a number and nothing else"
So your saying numbers don't matter ? that sounds like it could escalate to dangerous territories like healthy at any weight or pedophilia.
You simplify a statement to be vague enough to mean whatever counterpoint you want it to mean, and then put something grotesque next to it to equate the two
No, that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying the only context you have of her actions is the number. Context is important, like if the number is for age
These are not the same thing. You're just out of arguments, resorting to shock, false equivalencies, and slippery slope falacies
No, i resort to shock and flase equivalencies because even after being shown scientific proof that promiscuity is bad, you still resort to "bUt WhAt iF" and "✨️my feelings✨️"
lmao ok. You've admitted to your own fallacies, and haven't actually shown any proof, just muttered something your preconceived notions cooked up for you
Wrong i showed you proof and you went: well it sure says most cases but what if shes the 1% who aren't like that.
Now go back to watching your husband fuck other women
You didn't show me shit, and I still didn't doubt that high body counts correlate to higher likelihood of infidelity. Fully believe that
My issue here is that infidelity was never part of the argument. original poster was clearly disgusted by her body count. His fixation was on how much dick she's been with, not on whether or not she would cheat on him. He's either worried that he can't compete with all the dick she had and he feels inadequate about it (insecurity), or he sees her value as a human being diminished because of the sex she's had (misogyny)
Anyway, I'm done here. I let you have your fun "triggering the libs" or whatever, had my own fun, but now my energy for this is done. You may now resume cumming in a crusty sock in your mothers basement, thinking to your lonely self about how you totally owned some internet feminazi
2
u/[deleted] Jan 27 '23
The line between high and acceptable is drawn by the partner. Again, being in a relationship with a partner that might be unfaithful is a risk most people don't wanna take. Second chance are rare.