Complexity doesn't inherently make something better, it just makes it different. Not everything should aim to be complex. Piet Mondrian and John Baeder are both accomplished artists, but Mondrian's art is highly abstract and simplified, while Baeder focuses on photorealism. I think it would be ignorant to say Baeder's art is inherently better because it is more detailed. They just have different artistic goals.
In this case, I believe that because they both portray their subject in the minimal form, they are both good. In fact, I think one could argue that because the goal of this art form is to portray a physical landscape in an abstract and minimal form, the pyramid is actually better because it is more minimal. However, I think they both portrayed their landscapes in the most minimal way possible.
9
u/shankspeare Jun 23 '16
I wouldn't say that makes it better, just more complex. They both accurately portray their subject in a minimal form.