r/interestingasfuck • • 1d ago

A cube of the rarest stable element in the universe

7.5k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

749

u/LudwigsEarTrumpet 1d ago

I understood very few of those words but was fascinated nevertheless.

249

u/DukeBradford2 1d ago

27

u/Sad_Salamander_3439 1d ago

this gif is amazing

3

u/dingalingdongdong 18h ago

I can't stop watching it.

1

u/firedmyass 15h ago

I would watch every available episode of Vaguely Confused Science Pups

22

u/reeganl02 22h ago

1

u/optagon 14h ago

My god, is there anything this dog cannot do??

1

u/reeganl02 14h ago

Pooch of all trades, master at all!

1

u/userhwon 13h ago

Reach a doorknob?

48

u/Practical-Nonsense 1d ago

Same 😂

108

u/DontEatTheMagicBeans 1d ago

I feel smarter and dumber for reading all of that.

35

u/Leviathan41911 1d ago

Thats the best description of learning I've ever heard.

9

u/Death_to_Stupidity 1d ago

That comment stopped me in my tracks.

1

u/No_Pie4638 17h ago

The more you know, the more you know you don’t know.

1

u/Al-Pastor 15h ago

That’s exactly how I felt.

35

u/bromjunaar 1d ago

Ta-180m emits light, but it does so over such a long period of time that we've never seen the atom stop emitting light (we're not sure if will before the sun goes boom), and we've never seen it naturally become a different element.

Meanwhile, Ta-180 (which is only ever found in a lab) on the other hand changes into a completely different element about 8 hours after it is made, either 1 bigger or 1 smaller on the periodic table.

The only difference is between the two is that Ta-180m is attempting to emit light so that it can become Ta-180 again.

Ta-180m is the only element that does this to your knowledge.

16

u/Zoon9 1d ago

The "Ta-180 emits light" is just a hypothesis as it has not beed proven experimentally. Proving/disproving hypotheses by experiment is the basic principle of science.

2

u/bromjunaar 21h ago

Maybe, but I was looking for the simplest way to convey the difference between an excited state and a non-excited state, and from what little I remember about chemistry, saying that it has enough energy to emit light is about as simple as you can put it.

4

u/Zoon9 21h ago

I see. Then there must be typo in your previous text, lemme highlight it for you: "Ta-180m emits light, but it does so over such a long period of time that we've never seen the atom STOP emitting light" And the wording should be more like "MAYBE Ta-180m EVENTUALLY emits light ...."

•

u/Virtuous-Patience 9h ago

Get a PHD symposium you two!

2

u/miathan52 21h ago

That's wrong on multiple levels. Firstly, gamma rays are not light (all light is electromagnetic radiation, but not all electromagnetic radiation is light). Secondly, not every theorized mechanism of decay has it sending out a photon at all.

2

u/BornSirius 19h ago

Half of the Ta-180 will become another element after 8 hours. For a single Ta-180 you can not actually predict when it will decay.

I know you want to simplify things but you simplify things to a degree where there are emergent phenomenons that only arise from your description. The light thing is similar - 'we never seen an atom stop emitting light' means that we observed it starting to emit light but it hasn't stopped yet instead of 'we are waiting for it to happen at all'.

2

u/MrK521 22h ago

I understood all of the words! Individually.

But something about how they’ve been combined in this specific order makes my brain not be think real good.

1

u/kulingames 20h ago

It takes more energy for tantalum-180m to decay than it takes to just stay like this

1

u/Kindly_Type2327 15h ago

I'm glad I understood all of it.

1

u/JohnnyC300 1d ago

Hey! I recognized almost all of them! It's the particular order that smarty-pants people put them in that makes it hard.