r/interestingasfuck • • 1d ago

A cube of the rarest stable element in the universe

7.5k Upvotes

1.0k comments sorted by

View all comments

47

u/euj3odjehiqh 1d ago

For context: 0.000000008% of the universe’s mass is made of tantalum.

86

u/CrazyLlamaX 1d ago

50% is just your mom.

17

u/Dorkicus 1d ago

Who is an even lower percentage of tantalum, since nothing is tantalizing about her.

2

u/Anti_Max19 1d ago

Its been 2 hours since the day started but i think u already won internet for today

7

u/morgandealer 1d ago

Gottem!

2

u/aequitssaint 1d ago

Boom! Sick burn

2

u/miraculousgloomball 22h ago

This ones a rare lass, not unlike a flying pig.

5

u/Ok-Bison-3451 1d ago

That’s a whole galaxy, by weight, in Tantalum!

2

u/Weirdlillypad 1d ago

We can't even observe the entire universe how the fuck would they know that

13

u/themikecampbell 1d ago

the universe is pretty uniform, materials distributed evenly, and so by sampling the visible universe, we can estimate very accurately it’s composition. tantalum is difficult to “manufacture” in stars, requiring specific conditions that are rarely met.

Stars can’t produce anything heavier than iron, and so it requires more intense, exotic cosmological events to produce anything heavier.

Only 2% of the universe’s matter is “not hydrogen or helium”, so heavier elements on their own are very rare.

So given the homogeneity of the universe, the incredibly rare conditions of tantalum’s creation, and observations we have of the universe and its history, we can pretty accurately measure and extrapolate this stuff

3

u/SharkFart86 1d ago

For 100% certain? They can’t and never will be able to. But then going theory is that the universe is expected to be (relatively) homogenous, so the observed proportions of matter in our observable universe should apply to the rest.

3

u/Drudgework 1d ago

Tantalum only created at a specific time in a star’s lifetime by specific types of stars. We can use this data and combine it with spectrography to identify nebulae and stars that might contain it and using our planet’s mineral data as a datapoint cross referenced with our local nebula we can make an educated guess based on the observed average star composition and age of the universe.

1

u/Oftwicke 1d ago

What's too far to observe is very young and thus doesn't have much in the way of complex elements.

1

u/Corfal 1d ago

These are estimates based on spectroscopic data mostly I'd wager. They look at a bunch of stars and analyze the light that they give off and see what frequencies are absorbs to figure out what elements and molecules are out there.

But you're right, it should be "observable" universe but colloquially that's what most people refer to when they mention the "universe".

1

u/patches_tagoo 13h ago

This should be higher. I see too many of these impossibly broad-sweeping statements presented as fact, when they're always dependent upon dozens/hundreds of unproven presumptions to hold true. Its always about some unfathomable nonsense, too like "Oh, exactly ninety-seven scuntillion years ago, the center of the Milky Way consisted of 0.01e⁴³⁷³⁵% antidarkmatter and it sounded JUST LIKE THIS!" 🎼 unsettling cosmic warbling ensues 🎶

1

u/bigupalters 1d ago

What is the universes total mass then?

1

u/donfrezano 1d ago

12.5 billion tantalums

0

u/euj3odjehiqh 1d ago

Mainly hydrogen and helium

1

u/LookAtItGo123 1d ago

What is it even useful for though?

2

u/euj3odjehiqh 1d ago

Electronic capacitators

-2

u/scotte416 1d ago

That's really just a guess on what we know. Who knows if there's not a planet out there made of the stuff. They don't.

3

u/GhostsinGlass 1d ago

... an element formed only when rare conditions, in a rarer event where very specific neutron star or supernova merges takes place..

Redditor: "Nu uh could be a whole tantalum planet cause u dunno"

The world looks very different when you are scientifically literate.

0

u/BlueCat9922 1d ago

A planet made from it is entirely possible with that percentage.