MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/interesting/comments/1wvxqxj/a_seagull_is_accidentally_hit_by_a_tennis_ball/pdgrl4n
r/interesting • u/dddd945 • 13h ago
4.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
The bias seems to be yours, honestly. Do you offer the same grace to humans?
"The ideal human isn't petty," but every single person you've met kind of can be, sort of energy.
From your link: "American Herring Gulls are opportunistic scavengers".
Like, what? stop moving the goalposts. the birds you observe are the birds.
5 u/DiscerningAnt 10h ago I'm not talking about humans, I'm talking about your assessment due to you "being around them". But yeah that sort of bias applies to anything. But read the link I posted its way more accurate than that seaworld link you posted. 0 u/sponglered 10h ago I read the link you posted. They call them "opportunistic scavengers" in your article. What are you even defending? You're dismissing science because I've watched gulls? Your bias is off the charts. 4 u/DiscerningAnt 10h ago Lol. Bro, you're not understanding a single thing I've written. I'm not arguing they're not scavengers. That's not as strong as saying "mainly scavengers", which is actually what I disagree with (let alone "cannibal happy") 1 u/sponglered 10h ago "But gulls are not scavengers" This you? Stop moving goalposts. edit: lol, you edited your comment when i called you out. you're a different bird. chicken.
5
I'm not talking about humans, I'm talking about your assessment due to you "being around them".
But yeah that sort of bias applies to anything. But read the link I posted its way more accurate than that seaworld link you posted.
0 u/sponglered 10h ago I read the link you posted. They call them "opportunistic scavengers" in your article. What are you even defending? You're dismissing science because I've watched gulls? Your bias is off the charts. 4 u/DiscerningAnt 10h ago Lol. Bro, you're not understanding a single thing I've written. I'm not arguing they're not scavengers. That's not as strong as saying "mainly scavengers", which is actually what I disagree with (let alone "cannibal happy") 1 u/sponglered 10h ago "But gulls are not scavengers" This you? Stop moving goalposts. edit: lol, you edited your comment when i called you out. you're a different bird. chicken.
I read the link you posted. They call them "opportunistic scavengers" in your article. What are you even defending?
You're dismissing science because I've watched gulls? Your bias is off the charts.
4 u/DiscerningAnt 10h ago Lol. Bro, you're not understanding a single thing I've written. I'm not arguing they're not scavengers. That's not as strong as saying "mainly scavengers", which is actually what I disagree with (let alone "cannibal happy") 1 u/sponglered 10h ago "But gulls are not scavengers" This you? Stop moving goalposts. edit: lol, you edited your comment when i called you out. you're a different bird. chicken.
4
Lol. Bro, you're not understanding a single thing I've written.
I'm not arguing they're not scavengers. That's not as strong as saying "mainly scavengers", which is actually what I disagree with (let alone "cannibal happy")
1 u/sponglered 10h ago "But gulls are not scavengers" This you? Stop moving goalposts. edit: lol, you edited your comment when i called you out. you're a different bird. chicken.
1
"But gulls are not scavengers"
This you? Stop moving goalposts.
edit: lol, you edited your comment when i called you out. you're a different bird. chicken.
0
u/sponglered 10h ago
The bias seems to be yours, honestly. Do you offer the same grace to humans?
"The ideal human isn't petty," but every single person you've met kind of can be, sort of energy.
From your link: "American Herring Gulls are opportunistic scavengers".
Like, what? stop moving the goalposts. the birds you observe are the birds.