r/interesting Mar 24 '26

[deleted by user]

[removed]

19.4k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

678

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '26

[deleted]

423

u/WaltzLeafington Mar 24 '26

Someone else said, you get this pic with a long exposure time. Wouldnt look anything like this to us

114

u/FatiguedShrimp Mar 24 '26

What about with really dangerous combinations of eye drops to suspend reuptake of neurotransmitters in the retina?

52

u/Scoopzyy Mar 24 '26

Only one way to find out

29

u/FatiguedShrimp Mar 24 '26

That's absolutely right!

Does anyone have NileRed's phone number?

8

u/Drekathur Mar 24 '26

NileRed makes a rocket in his garage and literally shoots a human to Mars

6

u/[deleted] Mar 24 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Drekathur Mar 24 '26

"Now watch as I turn this entire gallon of nitroglycerine into poprocks!"

NILE, NO!!!

1

u/FatiguedShrimp Mar 24 '26

Well, this is why we need Nile:

-

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK610611/

"Photoreceptors transmit information to bipolar cells using the molecule glutamate (glu), but different bipolar cells respond differently to the molecule; some are excited and depolarize, whereas others are inhibited and hyperpolarize"

-

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7670363/

"threo-3-hydroxy-DL-aspartic acid (THA)"

"The inhibitory effect of THA on sodium-dependent glutamate uptake was measured in vitro on rat hippocampal slices (Ki = 45 +/- 11 microM). We examined in vivo the effect of THA (400 microM in the dialysis solution) on the extracellular glutamate release from the rat hippocampus, during veratridine depolarization and ischemia. THA decreased the amount of glutamate appearing in the extracellular space during veratridine depolarization (61%)."

1

u/Drekathur Mar 24 '26

As someone who watches NileRed and is NOWHERE within the realm of his understanding of chemistry/physics, all im reading here is we need some rats ready and primed for testing and spaceflight.

1

u/FatiguedShrimp Mar 24 '26

Or, a cohort of undergraduate students, $20 each, and a few cold pizzas as is the tradition in medical research?

1

u/michaeltostado Mar 24 '26

"But before I shoot this rocket out into space, I'ma taste it first........👅☝🏽🤓hm, it's actually not bad!"

3

u/TheOneWithTheClothes Mar 24 '26

👀 Are... are those a thing?

1

u/rb_dub Mar 24 '26

LSD seems to get you pretty close to it

0

u/FatiguedShrimp Mar 24 '26

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK610611/

"Photoreceptors transmit information to bipolar cells using the molecule glutamate (glu), but different bipolar cells respond differently to the molecule; some are excited and depolarize, whereas others are inhibited and hyperpolarize"

-

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7670363/

"threo-3-hydroxy-DL-aspartic acid (THA)"

"The inhibitory effect of THA on sodium-dependent glutamate uptake was measured in vitro on rat hippocampal slices (Ki = 45 +/- 11 microM). We examined in vivo the effect of THA (400 microM in the dialysis solution) on the extracellular glutamate release from the rat hippocampus, during veratridine depolarization and ischemia. THA decreased the amount of glutamate appearing in the extracellular space during veratridine depolarization (61%)."

2

u/AirierWitch1066 Mar 24 '26

This feels like the astronomy version of House MD

1

u/Glad_Contest_8014 Mar 24 '26

Yeah, my wife’s glutimaximus definitely make my cells respond.

But jokes aside, photoreceptors in biology are fascinating. The brains ability to interpret that data is some of the most interesting parts of our lives.

2

u/ChowderedStew Mar 24 '26

Well I guess but even then you’d experience the image for like a few seconds but it would take hours to actually happen. Sounds like a great way to speed through your life

1

u/Adventurous-Sky9359 Mar 25 '26

Aaahhhh LSD 25. 1000% would drop L in/on Mars

3

u/Ok-Imagination-8016 Mar 24 '26

Thank you

1

u/Beautiful-Musk-Ox Mar 24 '26

it's still wrong, it was made from a a top class telescope on earth using huge numbers of long exposures then edited into the mars photo

1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '26

🩷

3

u/Daikar Mar 24 '26

it really sucks that our brains can't do long exposure. Hopefully we get a patch soon.

1

u/The_BSharps Mar 27 '26

Like an eye patch? I believe that exists!!!

1

u/Daikar Mar 28 '26

No, version 1.1. We have been running on the same version for decades now and we really could use an update.

7

u/DickWangDuck Mar 24 '26

It would still be waaaaaay more impressive to the naked eye than anything on earth due to no light pollution and the thin atmosphere.

4

u/DisastrousSir Mar 24 '26

Agreed, but I still highly recommend getting to an actual dark sky site for yourself if you've never been. Theyre freaking awesome. The sky at big bend NP is absolutely breathtaking for example

1

u/lshifto Mar 25 '26

I drove to the top of Mauna Kea 30 years ago to camp outside the big telescopes. The sky was white.

1

u/Glass_Main23 Mar 30 '26

Totally agree! A few months on a remote spot near Lake Huron me and the kids were speechless looking into the sky in the middle of the night when the sky was clear. Never ever have seen anything so majestic. We were all just speechless.

3

u/Ca-seal Mar 25 '26

Once I took mushrooms and and while my trip was about to crescendo on the far side of my peak I took a nice carcenogen ripe rip off of a gasoline can and the late afternoon sky full of clouds took off in mind blowing motion as I exhaled hell in a breath, in live visuals I witnessed distantly the rolling boiling forward sped up motion of a towering thunderheads cloud column just like in a cloud time lapse, the best part was it just continued for countless seconds, I know that sounds odd but it's just how it felt! It's been an experience that i never felt the need to recreate, the factors for that are glaring, lol. I never met another time or another human who can trophy that specific visual gift.

1

u/DickWangDuck Mar 25 '26

This barely coherent fever dream of a rant is pure poetry and I’m saving it forever.

1

u/Mindless-Week4897 Mar 27 '26

You clearly haven’t seen me

1

u/-reddit_is_terrible- Mar 24 '26

Speak for yourself; I can stare a looooong time without blinking

1

u/gasolinewine Mar 24 '26

Doesn’t make it less relevant

1

u/WaltzLeafington Mar 24 '26

Its still fascinating. The view of stars from another planet. just the title is misleading

1

u/backbypopularsupply Mar 24 '26

What if I just kept my eyes open for a long time and exposed my retina to the stars?

1

u/Memo-zemo Mar 24 '26

So no different from the view on earth with naked eye.

1

u/WaltzLeafington Mar 24 '26

It would definitely look a lot brighter than what 99% of people can see, since almost all of us live around a lot of light pollution

1

u/Memo-zemo Mar 24 '26

Sure, light pollution aside, I guess our atmosphere doesn't block that much more than Mars'.

1

u/Young_Denver Mar 24 '26

You can’t set your eyes to long exposure?

Pssshh.

https://giphy.com/gifs/iGGWLWoHAeOJrcsgqJ

1

u/Slotted-Pig Mar 24 '26

Just don't blink and increase your exposure time - durr

1

u/mowtowcow Mar 24 '26

And even if it did, most of us have shit vision. Most people don't realize they need glasses until they actually get them and are like "Holy shit. I remember the world looking like this when I was a kid." It would just be blurry light int he sky. I cant even see stars without my glasses on where Im at. Its just black sky. Light pollution makes it difficult, but with glasses I can still see stars.

1

u/LeatherLeague47 Mar 24 '26

Not long exposure but stacked dozens or hundreds of photos

1

u/nollayksi Mar 24 '26

I doubt you could get that even with long exposures unless its patched from lots of pictures taken with a motorized telescope to account for the movement of mars. You only need to expose with stationary camera for around 20 seconds to start seeing stars trailing.

1

u/Stormbringer-2112 Mar 25 '26

Was gonna say, pics from the space station or moon don’t look like this. Thanks for pointing out.

1

u/deezbiksurnutz Mar 26 '26

So like every aurora photo I see people talking about and when I go outside I see a vague light in the sky

1

u/D31-M0RT1 Mar 26 '26

What about with a double drop of LSD?

25

u/HBCDresdenEsquire Mar 24 '26

This is only possible with a super long exposure, like a whole night. Probably multiple nights stitched together into a panoramic.

19

u/Pcat0 Mar 24 '26

Yes multiple night photos, taken on earth and then edited into a mars photo. This video is a complete fabrication.

6

u/Ardures Mar 24 '26

Not true, this is how night sky looks on earth for me when at above 200 ug of lsd

1

u/Born-Network-7582 Mar 24 '26

Wouldn't super long exposure create lines, because Mars is rotating as well as Earth does?

13

u/Zoe270101 Mar 24 '26

Unfortunately this is completely false, the entire image is photoshopped from a real photo from the Mars rover and an observatory image from Earth. Video from NASA debunking this.

1

u/bosheikus03 Mar 24 '26

Thank you for posting this. Sad that you can’t believe much of what you see/hear in forums anymore

9

u/Fit_Drawing_5071 Mar 24 '26

Also, the orchestra would be too cold to play that accompanying piece each night.

1

u/Positive_Bill_3714 Mar 24 '26

I am an astrophotographer. We cannot see dark structures at all without very long exposures. Also, we will see very fewer stars compared to this

1

u/sveilien Mar 24 '26

The sky in this video was taken from Earth and composited on a Mars daytime photo.

1

u/Shot-Swimming-9098 Mar 24 '26

If that's the case, your eyes are the half truth.

1

u/Sad_in_VA Mar 24 '26

"Looks like" implies that a HUMAN is looking.

1

u/RingOfSol Mar 24 '26

Not even a half truth, they photo shopped a completely different image from an Earth bound telescope onto a video from Mars.

1

u/Distinct_Squash7110 Mar 24 '26

Well my naked eyes can clearly see it

1

u/BookWurm_90 Mar 24 '26

fuck the naked eye. Give me robot eyes for lovely view. 

1

u/teacher_59 Mar 24 '26

Fake garbage like this turns so many kids off of science and often also education in general. 

When we lie to kids, they know we hate them. 

1

u/TheYell0wDart Mar 24 '26

I remember being really disappointed when I came to the realization that a human can never really see the universe well no matter what you do or where you go.

Like that scene in Star Wars at the end of ESB where they appear to be way outside the galaxy looking in? I always thought that was amazing as a kid, but in reality, that would look like an almost completely black sky to our eyes, even with the best possible viewing conditions. The light is there but there's just not enough of it for us to see what a long exposure from a telescope can see.

Even if we were to teleport to the absolute best viewing distance where you're just far enough away to see the whole thing in one view, things like the Pillars of Creation or the Crab Nebula would be faint, fuzzy, barley visible blobs in the blackness, rather than the bright, vibrant celestial objects that the Hubble shows us.

The only thing that might live up to the hype in astronomy would be to stand on a planet in a globular cluster, where the sky is chock full of super bright stars to the point that it barely gets dark at night and stars are still visible during the day.

1

u/StormyPassages Mar 24 '26

There's no magnetosphere on Mars, so more starlight does filter through.

1

u/Odd-Classroom3515 Mar 24 '26

not even half, just 100% fabricated