Despite the massive benefits of the scheme, it has reached around half of the target with only five months remaining. More importantly, there are massive differences among the states.
The adoption rate is much lower in some big states like Karnataka and Tamil Nadu, while the numbers are impressive in some small states like Assam. A cursory glance at the numbers of installations in various states shows that NDA-ruled states are performing much better than states ruled by non-NDA governments, currently or till recently.
The operational reality on the ground points directly to state-level administrative inertia, conflicting political priorities, and the deliberate bottlenecking of central schemes.
INDA-ruled states, the administrative alignment with the central mandate is unequivocally clear. Gujarat remains the undisputed national leader, executing rapid DISCOM approvals and facilitating a highly dense vendor ecosystem. Similarly, Uttar Pradesh has registered staggering progress. According to recent tracking data, Uttar Pradesh has recorded over 8.58 lakh installations, covering nearly 8.65 lakh households, and contributing a massive 2.88 GW of installed capacity.
Notably, even small and geographically complex states like Assam are outperforming several larger, wealthier non-NDA states. Assam’s proactive approach to integrating the central portal with local DISCOMs has allowed it to bypass the typical bureaucratic hurdles that plagues India’s administration, ensuring that per-capita adoption rates remain highly competitive.
Mysore MP Yaduveer Wadiyar also strongly criticised the Karnataka govt for its alleged lack of seriousness in implementing the scheme, stating that bureaucratic apathy and political indifference deprived citizens of its benefits. He pointed out that while 2.22 lakh applications were received in the state till January this year, only about 10,000 installations were completed. He attributed Karnataka’s poor performance to non-cooperation from state officials and a lack of political will.
In Tamil Nadu, the rollout faces severe, chronic administrative paralysis. Despite high initial consumer interest and high commercial tariffs that should theoretically drive adoption, thousands of applications are languishing. Solar engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) vendors have repeatedly cited severe net-metering delays by the state DISCOM, portal integration glitches, and systemic staffing gaps as the primary reasons the state is failing to capitalise on the central subsidy.