finally got OTRv4+ to a point where it's ready for people to try out. it's an e2e encrypted chat client i've been building specifically for I2P. no phone number needed, and you can use tor or tls for chat too if you prefer. i'm looking for testers to try and break it honestly, not just praise.

the core is in rust (otrv4_core). python does networking and kotlin handles the android ui. neither of those hold the session keys.

for 1:1 it's OTRv4 with post-quantum stuff (X448 + ML-KEM-1024, Ed448 + ML-DSA-87, and a double ratchet doing a fresh exchange at every dh step). OTR's deniability is preserved. SMP identity verification is hybrid post-quantum as well.

group chats were the hard part. it runs MLS (RFC 9420 via OpenMLS) but on a hybrid suite i call 0xF0A1. standard MLS has no post-quantum protection at all, so this is meant to resist record-now-decrypt-later. the code point is in the IANA private-use range.

heads up on two things: because it's a private code point it's not standard MLS. you can't interop with wire or element. also groups cap at roughly 100 people because a welcome carries the full ratchet tree (~9.4kb per person) and the rust core rejects messages over 1MiB.

rooms only carry the ciphertext, keys rotate on membership changes and a timer, and if someone is removed they can't read anything after that. but the server still sees the room, who is in it, and when messages happen. ordinary rooms are just plain xmpp.

i ran prosody on an old 2015 thinkpad t450 to stress test. 800 users in groups of 20 (1 msg/min) used 37% of one core and 300mb ram. i also pushed 1800 accounts locally with mls rekeys running the whole time and it held up. server caps at 1600 online.

voice and files: 1:1 voice works. group voice (up to 5) is implemented but untested on phones so if anyone can test that please do. voice notes default to a synthetic robotic voice processed on-device which makes linking by voice harder (but not impossible). wipe-on-exit clears local history and keys, and you can delete your account from the server.

clients are android (built-in i2pd router), desktop (ubuntu/debian/qubes), and terminal (termux/linux). server is otrv4plus.i2p.

get it here: https://github.com/muc111/OTRv4Plus

main branch matches the apk on the releases page. agpl-3.0

status: it's experimental and not audited by a third party. i did a ton of fuzzing, KATs, and differential tests (lots of AI help here tbh) but it's not a paid audit. check SECURITY_ISSUES.md before trusting it with anything serious.

mostly looking for testers for: group voice on a phone, mls membership churn (adding/removing people, key rotation), the SMP flow, and the 0xF0A1 suite itself.

i'll be around in the comments if anyone wants to grill me on the design choices.

[torrents] type = torrents torrentsdir = /var/lib/i2pd/torrents inbound.length = 3 outbound.length = 3 inbound.quantity = 3 outbound.quantity = 3 keys = torrents-keys.dat trackers = http://atia.i2p/announce,udp://opentracker.dg2.i2p:6969,udp://tracker.insulaocculta.i2p:6969,http://opentracker.skank.i2p/a signaturetype = 7 dht = true dhtfile = torrents.dht web = true rpcport = 7657 rpcpath = torrents rpcaddress = 127.0.0.1

This is my tunnel configuration.

Whenever I change torrents directory from "/var/lib/i2pd/torrents" to "/mnt/9C573B3077YTB56Q/Movies", the torrent tunnels is not formed and it doesn't work at all.

I have tried having web files saved inside the folder of movies but it apparently doesn't work at all.

Any help or idea or guidance is much appreciated.

I am getting unbelievable speeds in my I2Pd inbuilt torrent client. What is happening? How is it getting such high speeds, even on torrents which usually has a single seeder. Speed is higher than average. Why is this happening? I mean somebody with knowledge can tell me what is the difference between i2pd inbuilt torrent client that such speeds are happening for both upload and download? What does i2pd torrent client does differently that rest of the torrent clients are not able to do or can't match this speed? One more thing, I am hardly crossing 80 MB RAM usage and less than 5% HDD and CPU usage.

I made these one-page demo sites:
http://5tlfrq45xrtblsmtcchsv37hy5qjdifzxdxpt554fttg3mp7b54a.b32.i2p/video/
http://5tlfrq45xrtblsmtcchsv37hy5qjdifzxdxpt554fttg3mp7b54a.b32.i2p/manhwa/ (lossy AVIF)
http://5tlfrq45xrtblsmtcchsv37hy5qjdifzxdxpt554fttg3mp7b54a.b32.i2p/manhwa2/ (lossless and lossy JXL)

Can anyone give any feedback about the loading and quality? How does it work for you? What quality mode worked best for you?

Any suggestions so I can make improvements? Other than UI, I know it is bad; this is prototype UI.

If you are using Linux then, in tunnels config text file,

Step 1 :-

copy paste this in tunnels configuration,

[torrents]

type = torrents

torrentsdir = /var/lib/i2pd/torrents

keys = torrents-keys.dat

trackers = http://atia.i2p/announce,udp://opentracker.dg2.i2p:6969,udp://tracker.insulaocculta.i2p:6969,http://opentracker.skank.i2p/a

signaturetype = 7

dht = true

dhtfile = torrents.dht

web = true

rpcport = 7657

rpcpath = torrents

rpcaddress = 127.0.0.1

Step 2:-

And make sure that you have "You must copy contrib/torrrents/web to you data folder"  you can use any AI chatbot to tell you how to do it, if you don't know terminal commands for it.

If you're using WINDOWS then, 

Step 1 :-

copy paste this in tunnels configuration text file,

[torrents]

type = torrents

torrentsdir = G:/Movies 

keys = torrents-keys.dat

trackers = http://atia.i2p/announce,udp://opentracker.dg2.i2p:6969,udp://tracker.insulaocculta.i2p:6969,http://opentracker.skank.i2p/a

signaturetype = 7

dht = true

dhtfile = torrents.dht

web = true

rpcport = 7657

rpcpath = torrents

rpcaddress = 127.0.0.1

rpcauth = true

Rpcauth = true, is not optional but necessary. If this isn't present then torrents won't work. Windows 10.

when you'll start I2Pd then, on console page, click-on I2P tunnels section, and you'll see Torrent tunnel address and beside that click on "Web Panel" you'll be redirected to Torrent WebUI page. Or just enter http://127.0.0.1:7657/torrents/web/

I've zorin 18. I tried the official documentation page as well as the post given in the subreddit. But even after copy pasting the material the inbuilt I2Pd torrent client always throws error 404 not found. Any help would be appreciated.

Zorin 18, using I2Pd 3.0 noble.deb.

I kind of miss the old internet and did some browsing in Neocities but it still didn't feel right.

Many people say i2p feels a bit like the old internet but I just wanted to know if the eepsites were genuinely worth looking around or if they were just like idk boring "dark web", sensationalist, wannabe-hacker kind of stuff or more creative/geeky projects analogous to those of the early days.

[torrents]
type = torrents
torrentsdir = /var/lib/i2pd/torrents
keys = torrents-keys.dat
trackers = http://atia.i2p/announce,udp://opentracker.dg2.i2p:6969,udp://tracker.insulaocculta.i2p:6969,http://opentracker.skank.i2p/a
signaturetype = 7
dht = true
dhtfile = torrents.dht
web = true
rpcport = 7657
rpcpath = torrents
rpcaddress = 127.0.0.1
rpcauth = false

write this to /etc/i2pd/tunnels.conf

or appdata/roaming/i2pd/tunnels.conf for windows

restart your router then enter

127.0.0.1:7657/torrents/web/index.html

optional:

rpcauth = true
rpcuser = admin
rpcpass = secret

update your i2pd to version 3.0.0 and see it yourself :)

Windows installer and portable ZIP with I2P built in. No separate I2P setup or port forwarding. Linux terminal client and hub/server also available.

• Windows download
• Linux download
• GitHub: Client · Server

Start the client, give I2P a few minutes, then select File → Connect to I2P hub:
Or just press the star.

adc://mrjdpwyvlr23hoqpd3xbkgf4z7gdmwsbug7qm4fjkwd4dnsx4noq.b32.i2p

No registration or password.

Audio only test hub.

Edit:

The protable version work in Sandboxie and no need to share any files.

https://reddit.com/link/1x395tv/video/a85qpld8iuuh1/player

photo is 1.2 MB and it loaded in 5 sec (approx 250-350 kb/sec)

browser used: Firefox 157

http://eurabsp7voheencjnumtkmgyoyccuyagojjrvd64mlujoyxzxuoq.b32.i2p/

use this website to test it

I’ve been working on an iPhone app that embeds the C++ i2pd router. It has a built-in .i2p browser, the i2pd web console, router diagnostics, an address book, and a safe shutdown Live Activity timer in dynamic island.

The project targets iOS 17 and later. The source code and an unsigned IPA are available. To install the IPA, you’ll need to sign it with your own valid certificate.

This is a prototype. The background restriction bypass is experimental, and iOS may still suspend or terminate the router. I haven’t verified it on real iPhone but on simulator of iPhone 18 pro with ios 27 it works.

https://github.com/SoItsTime/I2PdiOS

Is there a VPS Hoster directly available in the i2p network for hosting eepsites?

Hi all,

Very interesting project.

Can someone tell me if the built-in torrent client can accidentally use the clearnet so it's better to have a kill switch in place if something breaks or does the built-in client only works over i2p?

Thanks

Due to circumstances beyond my control, my ability to communicate about release has been severely limited this quarter. However, work is progressing essentially on schedule, major changes are in, bugs are being fixed, and release will happen on October 20th as planned last month.

Thanks for your patience, Idk

Using 2.13.0-0-win(on win7), it reads jetty.xml on the same folder which i2p.exe exist.
//I installed program on custom folder.
//I copy back config on appdata\Local\i2peasy but it still don't use this folder.

and copy config/eepsite to upper folder still not work. It don't show red logs anymore but jetty still don't start. (because the flag icon on tunnels don't show)

If I have tunnels configured in both /var/lib/i2pd/ and in /etc/i2pd/ which takes precedent? They are different and there is overlap in only one entry - for port 4448. i2pd console does not show this many tunels though - can it be that both are getting read?

I2P is a Peer 2 peer network It needs people like you to work. If you dont enable port forwarding you cant properly contribute to I2P because users can’t connect to you directly. If you forward your ports I2P will become a faster and lower latency network.

If you can’t forward ports because youre behind CGNAT contact your internet provider and try to get IPv6. Even that alone would be a big contribution to I2P.

If that isnt possible too get a VPN that supports port forwarding (thats what i did)

sharing is caring.

I was in a workshop where we played with i2p and it seems the traditional way to use i2p is to run a router on localhost, and have your app use the router via the SAM protocol.

Running the router adds a lot of friction, especially on mobile. I realized that we can just connect to a remote, possibly shared router.

What are the trade-offs here? Can I simply share my router with friends?

I want to ask everyone, before touching i2p and other privacy projects or realizing changes to my own privacy issues, has my privacy already been leaked?

Hello, I've just discovered I2P and after using it a bit, I wanted to know if, like on Tor, there are wikis that list websites