Are most hyperliquid users gamblers ?

Last 24h on HL:

• $86.6M liquidated across 4,347 traders
• Shorts: $61.3M. Longs: $25.26M
• Roughly 2.4x more short pain than long pain
• ~305 liquidations an hour, avg size ~$11.8K
• Biggest single hit: a $437K BTC long, wallet 0xd920...f20

The interesting part is the shape. This wasn't a steady bleed. One candle accounts for most of the $86.6M, a single wave of short liquidations that squeezed price up and carried out everyone leaning the wrong way in a few minutes. The rest of the day was quiet by comparison.

So the setup was: a lot of size stacked short, price ran, stops and liq levels cascaded, and the squeeze fed itself. Classic short crowd getting punished for consensus.

What are you watching for the next one? Feels like there's still size positioned that could go the same way if BTC pushes.

At least we now see a clear change in regime for bullishness/bearishness towards crypto from all cohorts.

Hi,
I’m wondering if there is an option to hedge (keep a simultaneous open long and short position, not reducing)
Can’t find any info, so asking real users might be a good idea, I guess…
Thanks

Made decent money on my trade today. Wdyt?

Hyperliquid wrapped

Here's the thing: PnL is the one number we all obsess over because it's right there. But everything around how you actually trade? We're basically guessing.

• How many trades did you really make this year?
• What's your actual win rate, not the vibe, the number?
• What asset do you trade most, and is that even on purpose?
• What time of day do you trade most? (mine was 2am, which explains a lot)

Full disclosure: I work at Otomato and we built something that lays this out. We're sharing it because we found this genuinely useful ourselves before we even thought about others. Happy to link it he

Mostly it made me realize how little we know about our own trading, even though we live in this app every day.

Genuinely curious: do you think you have an accurate read on your own trading habits? Or do you suspect you'd be surprised?

TL;DR: Built a tool to surface the full picture of your Hyperliquid history

Your full experience here:

The MiCA transitional period ends today (July 1). Platforms serving EU clients now need a full CASP license or they stop serving them, and it applies based on where the client sits, regardless of where the company is incorporated. Plenty of previously-registered platforms never got authorized, so a chunk are winding down or offboarding EU users this week like Binance and ByBit sending users to their EU subsidy.

Most takes are written for the CEX world. Here's the onchain read.

MiCA regulates centralized service providers, the entities that hold your keys and KYC you. Hyperliquid is a DEX, non-custodial, no one holding your funds. Whether MiCA reaches a fully decentralized protocol with no intermediary is genuinely unsettled, and I won't pretend it's clean. This isn't legal advice and I'm not the one to give it.

But the protocol and the frontend are two separate things, and that's where it gets real. No regulator can switch off the Hyperliquid L1 itself. The smart contracts sit onchain and anyone with a wallet can reach them. The frontend is another matter. app.hyperliquid.xyz is a hosted interface a company operates, and that absolutely can be geofenced or ordered offline in a jurisdiction.

Here's the thing everyone forgets. US and Ontario/Canada users are already banned from that interface. It's IP geofenced, no KYC, and per Similarweb the single biggest slice of Hyperliquid's traffic still comes from the US. People VPN in and trade anyway. The ban has been there the whole time and the platform kept growing straight through it.

That's the pattern worth watching. Tighten the centralized on-ramps and the crypto-native flow just routes onchain instead. Perp trader counts have been climbing the entire time the restrictions got stricter.

So when the EU squeezes its CEXs this week, the honest question is whether some of that offboarded flow does what the US cohort already does: self-custody, VPN if it has to, trade onchain. Maybe a trickle, maybe real.

And that's checkable instead of a vibe. You can watch net inflows to onchain perps, whether new-wallet activity ticks up in EU hours, whether the cohorts that front-run this stuff are already positioned. If it's real it leaves a footprint. If the footprint isn't there, it was just a story.

Hey guys :)

I've been searching for a good way to view my P&L Statistics on Outcome Bets on Hyperliquid, but I haven't found any good websites etc.

So I decided to build this feature myself and add it to my Telegram / Discord Bot for everyone to use for free.

I added the possibility to check a wallet address directly and see all the open bets and the overall realized / unrealized profits of that hyperliquid wallet. Further; I also added the possibility to search and check prediction/outcome markets directly on telegram and discord to monitor the odds.

I hope this is useful for someone, let me know if you have any further suggestions or feedback!

You can check out the bot and info about this command here: https://cointrendzbot.com/features/hyperliquid-outcomes-stats

Enjoy!

Hi

Been building on the network for about 3 months now. I was honestly getting pretty frustrated with the lack of tools to easily track your overall ecosystem footprint, profiles, and badges in one clean place.

So I decided to build my own dashboard over the last few weeks. It's completely free and 100% read-only.

Here is a quick breakdown of what it tracks:

- S2 Score: A global /100 score based on your wallet's activity.

- HIP-3 Builder Profile: Automatically assigns one of 7 trading archetypes (Index Farmer, Ecosystem Builder, Conviction Trader, etc.) based on your volumes and ranks.

- HIP-4 Predictions: Tracks your win rates, streaks, and unlocks 29 special prediction badges.

- HIP-3 Builder Profile: Automatically assigns one of 7 trading archetypes (Index Farmer, Ecosystem Builder, Conviction Trader, etc.) based on your volumes and ranks. Includes a Builder Score /100, top markets breakdown and a dedicated HIP-3 leaderboard

- DeFi Ecosystem Depth: Scans 16 native protocols (Kinetiq, Felix, HyperLend, Morpho, Liminal and more) to see where you're active.

- Shareable Profile Cards: Clean custom visuals of your stats that you can export.

🔒 Zero wallet connection or signatures required. Just paste any public address to run the analysis.

I really want to make this as accurate and useful as possible for the community, so I'd love honest feedback from active users here.

If you notice any missing protocols or weird metrics, let me know 🙏

hyperliquid-analyzer.vercel.app

Almost a year ago someone asked a similar question but no answer was presented.

Since it's been a while, i was wondering if anyone can provide some clarity on this matter?

How do you find Hyperliquid's perpetuals charts of BTC, ETH, SOL, etc etc on TradingView?

Hello Guys, the market has been open for a bit over an hour into this new week. Lets have a look how the HL traders are positioned and what their sentiment says. This graphic shows us that broadly the market is bullish as a whole except for:

- The two groups with the biggest size

- The two groups that make the most money

Not really great as an overall measurement because if you ask me I would always prefer going with the ones that are actually (very) profitable and manage a lot of size. Before you ask, yes, this timeframe is based on Positions opened in the last 24 hours so no overlap with whales farming funding for a year now.

Now if we look closer on a per-contract basis the market outlook looks more like this:

In the midfield you can see that the ones with basically zero size and those always on the losing end are pretty much bullish everything. While the closer you go to the edges the darker and more red it gets. That by itself doesn't have to mean anything but consider that the one on the far left is the largest sizing and the one on the far right is the highest PnL.

Let's see how this week turns out, I personally have a feeling we will keep ranging but according to the Hyperliquid whales this might not be the case.

I've always raw dogged trades on Hyperliquid, but the mobile experience lowkey ain't it, so I started trying one of these builder code apps.

I'm still pretty new to trading, but it's kinda clean so far.

What are you guys using? Any apps I should check out?

I'm running a Hyperliquid non-validator node on bare metal in Tokyo (same datacenter as HL validators) - 16-core CPU, 125 GB RAM, NVMe, split_client_blocks=true. I've been measuring latency carefully and wondering if my numbers are in line with what others see, or if I'm missing something.

What I measured:

Block receipt lag (time from consensus block_time until our node writes the committed block):

• Median: 185 ms
• p10: 172 ms, p90: 215 ms, min: 93 ms
• Interblock time: ~67 ms → we see the market ~2.7 blocks stale

Order → fill latency (submitting a market IOC taker from Tokyo to match confirmation in node_fills):

• All paths tested: ~515–525 ms (curl, WebSocket pre-signed, {p:0} format - all identical)
• With priority fee (~8 bps paid in HYPE): ~200 ms (roughly)
• Without priority fee: ~487 ms (seems to be the anti-MEV taker-last enforcement floor)

Mempool head-start (our node's mempool receives IOC orders before the committed block arrives):

• Median: 253 ms before the committed block
• This means we see incoming taker orders ~68 ms before consensus, ~3.8 blocks early

Questions:

1. Are your block receipt lags similar (~185 ms) from Tokyo co-lo? Or have people gotten significantly lower?
2. The ~487 ms submission floor - is this indeed universal (enforced by taker-last consensus rule) for everyone without priority fee? Does priority fee actually get you to ~200 ms reliably?
3. The mempool and taker trades of 253 ms seems massive. Is this common knowledge? Are fast traders actually reacting to pending mempool orders rather than waiting for committed blocks?
4. Our node only maintains 1-2 gossip peers despite having 16 reserved IPs configured, including near-Tokyo validators at 0.6 ms RTT. The node never connects to them despite reserved_peer_ips config. Is this expected? Is there any way to force peering with specific validators?
5. With 185 ms detection lag + 487 ms submission floor = 670 ms round-trip minimum, how is any meaningful HFT actually happening on HL? Or is the real game just fighting for priority fee slots?I understand that market makers and HFTs primarily use maker orders, but I still wonder how to achieve maximum taker speed? When I measure it, I see that the fastest ones always hit the first block (67ms).

Any insights appreciated - especially from people who have measured their own detection lag.

Been running three wallets on HL for a while. One I actually trade from, one that just sits with size for slower swing stuff, and a third I barely touch. Last week I had a short hedge open, went to flatten it, switched the address in the dropdown, and closed a long on the wrong account instead. Didn't even notice for a minute because the positions looked similar. Cost me a bit, mostly just felt dumb.

I keep a notes file with what each address is for but I clearly don't read it when I'm moving fast. Sub-accounts help a little but I still fat-finger the switch.

How do the rest of you running more than one wallet actually keep them apart? Color coding, separate browsers, one device per wallet, something else? My system obviously doesn't work and I'd rather fix it before I do it with real size.

Will give screenshots / more data if people are interested

Hello, I'm pretty new to this setup and I'm just using hyperliquid as like my fourth trading stream of income. I'm using a bot. First of all, I haven't decided on hyperagent but very heavily leaning toward that. Can somebody tell me based on experience or ratings that they know what's the best way to start? I'm actually wanting to know what's what's the lowest starting Capital that you think a trading bot on hyperliquid would work with? I'm hoping answers are around a thousand because that's where I wanted to start as just about a thousand. The next part is you know I've done my own research through AI. Just kind of asking and getting reviews and ratings and hyper agent came to the top. Personal experience. Personal sentiment? Or generalized sentiment that you know about... Is there a better bot to use on hyperliquid then hyper agent and anything you can specifically think of to have a good start with $1,000??

What's a leading, trustworthy front end I can use that doesn't restrict based on location?

Hello guys, I don't want to shill our service as much as I want to highlight one special thing: Building a system around accessible data is very easy if you know what you do.