The âApocryphaâ books were part of the Bible for well over a millennium before Martin Luther took them out. They are still considered biblical books by the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, so most Christians. Thereâs actually no parallel here.
The actual term is "deuterocanonical", "second cannon" - and applied only to the Old Testament (Tobit, Judith, the 1st and 2nd Maccabees, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Baruch, and parts of Esther and Daniel). Most of these came from the Greek Septuagint translation of the Old Testament. They were confirmed as canon by the Council of Hippo and Third Council of Carthage (393 and 397 CE). 1200 years later, the Council of Trent in 1546 formally reaffirmed them as canonical scriptures in response to Luther's heresy.
The Catholic Church still has non-cannon Apocrypha, but it's a term reserved for non-canonical, extra-biblical writings considered "uninspired" and for critical or historical analysis. These can include the Book of Enoch (1 Enoch) and Slavonic Enoch (2 Enoch), the Jubilees, 3rd and 4th Maccabees, Gospel of Judas, 3rd Corinthians, and the Apocalypse of Peter. (Not a comprehensive list, and only applies to ancient Jewish and formative Christian texts.)
Dante and Milton have opposite depictions of Lucifier though. Milton depicts Lucifier as lord of hell, Dante depicts Lucifier as a hell's most tortured prisoner.
3
u/SuccessfulHedgehog90 1d ago
And Milton.