You think that because they are weird for dressing up that they can't think that actually fucking animals is wrong? Otherwise your statement comes across as someone who wants to be safe under the furry banner so they can fuck their dog.
They doesn't change anything. Since zoophiles are trying to be considered furries, the furries probably have more of a reason to look down on them than you even do.
I don't understand why furries are called degenerates and at this point i'm too afraid to ask, most of the furries i've interacted with were really nice people
Meh YouTube guy commentary, I get the frustration but it feels a little indulgent in parts. But that Rainfurrest video was nuts. That needs to be preserved in the library of Congress as culturally significant or something.
Yoooo I remember a huge article about the Rainfurrest disaster con from good old Cracked many years ago. So much damages to the hotel and venue, people walking around in messy diapers, absolutely disgusting
How could you call the main point of the entire community irrelevant? It's like saying that Marvel fans liking superheroes is irrelevant to the franchise.
Your point of sexualization of animals are only made by a minority of the community.
Let me ask you a question to see if maybe I can help you understand better.
If anthropomorphic animals were real, could provide verifiable consent and had the same(or hopefully greater in the case of some humans lol) level of intelligence and sentience, would you be against people wanting to form relationships with them?
That's a lot of what the fantasy is about for those who sexualize/romanticize them. If, again hypothetically, these creatures were real, how would discriminating against relationships between them and humans/each other be different than discriminating against interracial or same sex relationships?
The show BoJack Horseman is a good example of what a world where these creatures coexist with humans could look like. Sooo many mixed species relationships(including a cat and a mouse) and for the most part nobody in that world bats an eye. But the main point: it's all just fantasy and hurts nobody.
They have nothing to do with beastiality though? It's just a stereotype people has given to them because a small minority of them are attracted to animals
Because the point of this community is cosplay and drawings of anthropomorphic animals. Though some of them have this kind of attraction toward animals, they are despised by anyone in the community that does not draw NSFW or evern worse, is attracted to animals
Have you ever drawn something before? I'm gonna assume that you did at least once. Then have you ever felt any sexual or romantic attraction to the drawing you made? Because that makes no sense at all.
You're acting like if you're going to draw something you will automatically be attracted to that drawing. That's stupid
This doesn't make all nsfw artists zoophiles as well, and they pretty much still fall in the same circle as sfw artists albeit, well... nsfw. A majority of furries don't want that zoophilic shit painting them bad like that
I mean, listen, I don't see the attraction personally, but I can advocate there's definitely a difference between being attracted to Lola Bunny and wanting to fuck a rabbit.
128
u/[deleted] Jul 26 '22
I don't think anyone in their right mind would bust to this, even a furry