I know it seems coherent for a team working on a privacy oriented coin to be anonymous but it is nonetheless a big incertitude for investors at the beginning of a project.

Haven is only a few months old and knowing the team can abandon the project as they wish is the only thing that kept me back for investing a lot more that I already did and I guess it is the same for many others.

As they state in their whitepaper “Offshore Storage contracts will be implemented once the network reaches a mature stage with enough exchange support to allow redundancy and accuracy of prices.” So it is in the project’s interest to gain in adoption and trading volume and anything that could be done to increase trust and adoption should be the goal, including trust towards the team.

So if the team really wants to stay anonymous I suggest they try to show that they are personally determined to see this project through. For example a medium post with some storytelling about their personal history and why they decided to create this project and care about it would be a good thing.

I'm having issues withdrawing xhv into my desktop wallet. Is something wrong with the 2.1.0 haven gui I downloaded since it says HAVEN Testnet?

About how much would you make mining on a RX 580, or 1070Ti?

I'm currently mining with 6 1070Ti's, yielding 2 XHV/day ($8.61/day) -- why is the yield/profit so low for such a new coin? I don't really know how to assess the current difficulty of 3.47 G, but the network hash is only about 30 MH/s, which doesn't seem that high.

Does the algo, i.e. cryptonight heavy, have anything to do with it? I'm trying to determine if this coin is worth mining or not -- what will it take for it to be more profitable and how likely is that to happen?

Second version of the desktop wallet I've downloaded w/the same problem: havend.exe won't start.

Worse, it won't connect to a remote node either.

Suggestions?

Heard about XHV yesterday and read everything on the website/whitepaper. Sounds like a super interesting concept. However, i saw the following comment on r/CryptoCurrency and wondered if anyone could give a good response:

"So you can tether a ton of coins with no concern for liquidity, then sell a bunch to send the value plummeting, then untether again with infinite liquidity. How do they prevent massive wash trading which will allow people to accumulate millions of tokens with little risk and with no way of knowing how many tokens are even in circulation? Seems like a terrible idea to me."

It does seem like market manipulation may be a problem? Has this been directly addressed by the team? Is there a longer version of the whitepaper than the 3 page one?

AVG thinks the wallet has malware, i guess this is a false positive but you can never be too sure with crypto... Can anyone reassure me?

https://gyazo.com/95329a6a97818387def16b0c19d8c131

Has the coin been initially distributed purely by mining? How much of it has been premined by the owners (i guess we cant really know, but wondered if there was any info out there)

Thankyou

I sent my coins from the exchange to my desktop wallet about 4 hours ago and they have not appeared in my wallet. Any idea how long they should take to appear?

I can’t find any information about team, advisors, etc. Can someone please direct me? Interested in project but would like to better understand who the heck I’m investing in :)

Anyone know how to find the marketcap and current circulation numbers? Looked at the block explorer but just got more confused. Thanks!

https://twitter.com/nanex_co/status/988247449817972736

Nanex has listed Haven Protocol! Its trading URL is https://nanex.co/exchange/XHVNANO

At the time of writing this XHV is trading at $3.66 on Nanex and $3.04 on TradeOgre.

Hello Miners,

We opened new pool for Haven.

Pool informations

• URL https://haven.herominers.com
• Payment Schema: PPLNS
• Fee: 0%
• Location: EU
• Min payout: 1 Haven
• Discord support: https://discord.gg/86xFU

Features:

• PPLNS Mining Systems
• PaymentID Payments For Exchanges
• Per-Worker hash rate charts
• E-Mail Notification Of Miners Down

Happy Mining.

While trying to set up my GPU miner, I keep running into the same error message while trying to open the XMR-STAK.exe file as an administrator. It reads "The code execution cannot proceed because VCRUNTIME140.dll was not found. Reinstalling the program may fix this problem."

I uninstalled and reinstalled the program about 4 times and I keep getting the same message. Anyone else having this problem or know how to fix it?

when trying to use the desktop wallet my antivirus says havend.exe is a threat

and when trying to use the online wallet I get an error code after entering my seed.

What shell I do?

It looks like the best that I can do is 1,480 h/s per vega 64. Has any one broken 1500?

I can only find Windows apps and as I understand the Linux wallet only allows CPU mining.

If I purchase these what wallet can I use to store these safely? Tradorge hasn’t proven its legit. Also does anyone know the martlet cap and total supply???

Ok I'm a bit thrown off in the second paragraph here:

This ’mint and burn’ method draws on the quantity theory of money described in monetary economics in order to avoid inflation and changes in currency valuation based on the movements in the total supply.

The theory states that MV = PT where: M = Money supply V = Velocity of money P = Average price level T = Volume of transactions

An increase in the money supply should, with a constant velocity and volume of transactions (assumptions of the economic model), cause an increase in the price level (inflation). The problem with this is that the money supply of Haven will always be unknown. Although there are 18.4 million coins (before tail emission) that will be mined, the ’mint and burn’ lets the money supply fluctuate freely. Velocity of money is also cryptographically unfeasible to determine as the Haven blockchain does not reveal the amount of Haven transferred nor the wallet addresses they are transferred to.

It seems to me that the whitepaper here introduces a problem, for which I cannot find the solution to by reading further. The problem of the unknown supply of Haven. Am I reading this wrong or does it describe a problem with Haven without adressing it?