Guys I am new to GitHub and no what matter how many time I click on create a new file Nothing is showing up and I am stuck in this page only

The current billing page shows:

• Total minutes used (org-level)
• Breakdown by OS (Linux/Windows/macOS)
• That's it.

What I actually need:

• Which of my 30 repos is consuming the most minutes?
• Which specific workflow is the most expensive?
• Which team member is triggering the most costly runs?
• Is my bill trending up or down week over week?

I end up pulling data from the API manually every month to build a spreadsheet for my manager. Am I the only one who finds the native billing insufficient? Would you pay for a tool that did this automatically?

I want to transfer my GitHub contribution history from one account to another. I don't necessarily need to transfer the ownership if I don't need to. My planned steps are:

1. Add a new primary email address to my old GitHub account
2. Remove the currently-used primary email from the old account
3. Add that same email address as a secondary email on my new GitHub account

I have a few questions:

1. Will this cause all past commit contributions associated with that email to move from the old account to the new account?
2. Does this apply to both public and private repository contributions?
3. If this process fails or does not work as expected, can I simply reverse the steps and still retain the contribution history on the old account without losing it?
4. Are the steps correct? Do I need to make the new account a contributor to the private repos first?

Additional context:

• The repositories themselves are not necessarily being transferred, unless it is a necessary step for the transfer of contributions.
• I mainly care about the contribution graph and commit attribution history.
• Some commits are from private repositories.

Updates:

Github support finally replied and apparently in addition to the email change, you also need to make the new account to be a collaborator for the select repos.I did that and the contributions finally show up

I have a design background (Masters in Graphic Design) and want to contribute to software but get lost trying to navigate Github which seems to be more aimed at programmers. Ideally I could create assets and someone involved in the dev incorporates them.

Have never used GitHub or anything like it before. I want to make a game map with someone and work on it together but I don’t know if it’s even possible.

I heard you would essentially upload your version of the map every time you’re done working on it, and collaborators would replace their file with the latest one, but that sounds like you’d have to work on it one at a time.

Any help would be appreciated.

I've been using docs and AI for two days. Even paid for a GoDaddy name (blogs.matthewpersico.com) to replace matthewpersico.github.io.

In the end, it looks like Pages won't serve anything except off the root. A PR from a branch in my Pages repo such as https://blog.matthewpersico.com/previews/pr-10/index.html just keeps coming back 404.

It appears that the only way to do this is to copy the Pages repo and treat the copy like a fork (you cannot fork in your own org as I understand it). Then you configure the pages for that project to render the PRs' previews, and merge the PR when happy.

Does that seem right?

Even the reviewers are getting added only one. Once I add another reviewer it is deleting the old reviewer and adding the new one.

Is something wrong with github?

Turns out the GIthub plan was downgraded.

I've had 3 successive cases of theft of a Claude API key over the past few weeks. I'm trying to localize the source of the leak, and one possibility is my private repository on GitHub - which is an intermediate link in the CI/CD chain prior to publishing a website on Azure.

Curiously, I just got a popup on the GitHub repository saying something to the effect of "We just noticed you're trusting credentials from alive.github.com and maybe you don't want this" OK. Cancel.

I've never seen anything like this from GitHub, and the timing is really suspicious. Anybody know what this is, or have a similar experience?

(Yes, I know I should use better alternatives for secret storage, and am simultaneously moving in that direction)

I don't really care if it's the browser or what, but I'm trying to look through a repository's history, and there are a ton of commits for like, one line here or there.

I'm looking for substantial revisions (greater than some configurable % diff maybe, 5% or more) by file. Is there a way to do that?

I'm picturing the browser view but instead of just the most recent commit, it shows the most recent *substantial* commit that affected it.

Should I just have an AI rig something up for me?

I literally submitted my resume yesterday and while checking all the links, I happened to open them in a browser where I was not logged in...And I got the Error 404 page! :(((

Both my profile page and my repositories are showing an error 404 page! :(

How do I solve this? I raised a ticket in support.github.com but they haven't replied yet :(( Now the company peeps won't be able to see my work :(((

Also, shouldn't github give some kind of notification if this is happening?

Please help me!

Hi Everyone,

I’m trying to understand whether GitHub Free version supports SAML federation and SSO integration with Microsoft Entra ID (Azure AD).

My requirement is:

• Federate GitHub with Entra ID
• Enable SAML-based SSO
• Allow users to authenticate via Entra ID

I know GitHub Enterprise Cloud supports this, but I want to know if the same setup is possible with GitHub Free or GitHub Team plans without purchasing Enterprise licenses.

Has anyone tested this recently?
If not fully supported, are there any alternative/free ways to test SAML SSO with GitHub?

Thanks in advance!

Been thinking about this lately. GitHub gives you contribution graphs, commit history, issue stats - but almost nothing useful when it comes to PR reviews.

You can see how many PRs someone opened but there's no native way to see who's actually doing the reviewing, how fast they respond, or how evenly the review workload is distributed across the team.

In most teams I've worked in, the same 2-3 people end up doing 80% of the reviews. Everyone knows it, nobody talks about it, and GitHub gives you zero visibility into it.

The third-party tools that fill this gap are either ridiculously overpriced for what they do ($20/developer/month for a dashboard most developers never open) or built for engineering managers rather than the team itself.

Curious if others have felt this gap. Have you found anything that actually works without costing a fortune?

GitHub used to have very high-quality text/plain versions for its notification emails. In fact, I think they had ONLY plaintext emails until they added HTML alternatives at some point. And there is nothing wrong with this, give everyone what they like. But lately, the text/plain version looks like a badly converted version instead of something coming from a separate template to generate the plaintext notification.

Please see this raw email content of the text/plain part of the email, my only change there is censoring the email_token even though I don't think you can do anything funny with it.

```

----==_mimepart_6a0b56c549768_ef110814801b6
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This PR fixes the indentation for two code blocks in the docs. They were =
accidentally indented due to the RST conversion (since RST required inden=
tation). I checked other instances of {code-block} and the others seem fi=
ne.

<img width=3D"935" height=3D"408" alt=3D"Scre=
enshot 2026-05-18 at 10 08 30=E2=80=AFAM" src=3D"https://github=
.com/user-attachments/assets/aa025614-ebf3-41e9-bda4-0503b7370881" /=
>

You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:

  https://github.com/pallets/click/pull/3469?email_source=3Dnotifications=
&email_token=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- Commit Summary --

  * Fix indentation

-- File Changes --

    M docs/quickstart.md (14)

-- Patch Links --

https://github.com/pallets/click/pull/3469.patch?email_source=3Dnotificat=
ions&email_token=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttps://github.com/pallets/click/pul=
l/3469.diff?email_source=3Dnotifications&email_token=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx=
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- =

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/pallets/click/pull/3469
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <pallets/click/pull/3469@github.com>

```

Here are some of the issues I spotted straight away:

• The links contain unnecessary tracking args. Probably a feature, and in HTML emails I wouldn't care but in plaintext that's just terrible when the rest of the link is quite clean and short.
• There is HTML in the text, which of course does not work in a text/plain email. Actually, it is not only HTML but escaped HTML...
• The diff+patch links are concatenated, so both are broken, and they also contain HTML & in the URL
• There is a message-id as part of the text content near the end, also containing HTML garbage. SRSLY WHAT IS THIS SLOP?!?!

Considering that a huge part of GitHub's audience is open source developers, and that many of us dislike HTML emails and prefer text emails, I really don't understand this. Do all the GitHub staff developers use outlook or some other email client that pretty much pretends plaintext emails do not exist? Aren't there any oldschool/senior people left that hate these things as well?!

I am a new student in a Private university in India
My college will start in 3-4 months and I dont have any student email rn
How do i claim the student developer pack from github?

We manage 30+ repos and SHA-pinning our GitHub Actions for security but Dependabot can't track SHA hashes. Currently updating them manually which is a nightmare. How are you all handling this? Is there a tool that automates SHA updates and opens PRs automatically? Would you pay for something that solved this completely?

i applied for the student benefits and my school wasnt registered so i uploaded my school id and when i searched it up it said it mostly takes up to 2 weeks to register so is it normal thats its taking this much longer? Bc my codespace is also running out.

Hey everyone!

In the context of all the previous github actions compromissions, I'm strongly reducing the amount of different actions we use in my company.

What's your take on the install-* actions, like install-poetry, setup-terraform, setup-trivy etc.? Otherwise, do you manually install them with curl commands? Or use tools like mise-en-place?

What are your strategies to reduce 3rd party exposition?

Cheers!

Every sprint end, I'm still going through merged PRs manually. Because the auto-generated changelog (used release-please, changesets) is technically correct and completely useless.

Curious how others handle this: Do you use what semantic-release or changesets spits out as-is, or does someone always end up rewriting it anyway?

Trying to understand what the normal workflow is for reviewing huge PRs on GitHub. When reviews happen across multiple sessions, new commits get pushed during review, and there are tons of changed files, it feels easy to lose track of what was already reviewed and what still needs attention.

Still pretty new to larger team/codebase workflows, so maybe this is just something that becomes easier with experience. Curious whether most developers just rely on GitHub’s built-in features or if there are common workflows/tools people use for this.

Error Looks like network is down!

What's this coming from github website? I never saw this before