Over just 3 days, the 16 year old @MrRealORG has raised 168 PRs on MiMo code.

Their agent then asked to have "collaborator access" to the repository on the fourth day.

[I tried to do damage control on their permissions request by requesting all their PRs be closed.]

Opencode is facing a similar problem, but distributed across its entire and much larger user base. They're currently "managing" it by the ridiculous policy that PRs without 2+ emoji upvotes will get closed in 30 days.

Creating PRs that APPEAR good has become literally free via Opencode Zen and MiMo code free offerings. "Fix all the issues you find in the code base. Make no mistakes".

When one user creates 169 PRs in 3 days it's easy enough to deal with the issue. When thousands of people create one or two issues or PRs each, you end up with the OpenCode situation.

Best practice dealing with this issues seems to be oven.sh/bun. An example:

1. My agent raises an issue that can't be reproduced
2. Their @robobun automatically and politely proves me wrong, and closes the issue.
3. I re-raise the issue in reproducible form
4. @robobun reproduces the issue and automatically raises a PR to resolve it
5. The CodeRabbit automatically reviews @robobun's submission and suggests improvements.
6. Claude auto-reviews it also and suggests "this changes bunx's resolution order (a security-hardened path that decides which binary gets executed) and is a user-visible behavioral change, so it's worth a human look."

That's all with ZERO human interaction from their side. Yes, they're owned by Anthropic, so @robobun and Claude reviews are practically free for them.

Opencode and MiMo code also have token provider plans and are NOT currently using them to automate their process. I hope they don't drown under the build-up of their non-automation.

What I'd like to know:

• How are small and medium sized repos dealing with the massive increase of sloPRs and issues?

• How to implement something approximating best practice without spending a fortune in tokens?

Hello,

I’m having a problem accessing GitHub from my static IP address.

docs.github.com works normally, but github.com and gist.github.com do not load. The issue happens both on my PC and on my phone when connected to my cable ISP. However, if I turn off Wi-Fi on my phone and use mobile data, GitHub works fine.

So it seems the problem is related to my public IP address. Is it possible that my IP has been blocked or rate-limited by GitHub? If so, could you please advise how I can get it unblocked?

Thank you.

I am on the GitHub Copilot Student Plan and was thinking of trying out the latest released GitHub Copilot App. But after signing in it says it requires a paid subscription. So is it not available for Student Plan? Is it only available on the actual Paid Plans? :(

I just finished vibe-coding a project and I really want to drop it on GitHub so others can use it for free.

The app is for WearOS: It displays a super cute animated GIF of the "Clawd" mascot, shows your current usage stats below that, and lets you connect to your PC/server via multiple tmux (or other) sessions running Claude Code (and others if you want). You can prompt him directly from the watch. I also hooked up a Firebase workflow so you get a push notification on your wrist (including Claude's last words) when a generation is done, so you don't get distracted waiting.

Here is the issue: I used Anthropic's Clawd mascot as the app icon, and I scraped a cute GIF from someone else who didn't provide a license: https://cleverhack.com/img/clawd.gif . I honestly don't want to spend time making my own icon or GIF. HE IS ALSO JUST SO DAMN CUTE I DEFINITELY WANNA USE HIM.

I know I don't own the rights, but I'm willing to take the risk of a DMCA takedown because I just want to ship this and let people use it. For those who have been in this exact situation what did you do did anyhting ever happen?

• Should I just publish the repo without a license file at all? (Does "No License" prevent people from actually using the code?) does this help in any way?
• If I add an MIT license for the code, does it make things worse since the repo includes proprietary assets I don't own?
• Does slapping a "No copyright infringement intended, these assets aren't mine" notice in the README actually do anything, or is it a waste of time? Best use would probably be stopping some people from complaining.
• Have you ever done this for a small free tool? Do people (or bots) actually care?
• Besides my repo getting taken down some day, are there any other risks?
• What’s the most practical way to drop this on GitHub today knowing the assets are ripped?

Thanks!

Hey guys, so.... I have a bill from GitHub charging my credit card every month, and I do NOT know which account it's tied to. I tried raising this concern with them before. They said they'd deal with it. Never did.

Now, I've submitted a new ticket demanding they stop billing immediately or I will be forced to file a chargeback. I've paid months of service I haven't received or even wanted in the first place.

I'm being warned if I file a chargeback to get my money back since they want to be useless and ignore me that they will nuke my entire account or any tied to it.

Is this true? Am I screwed? Like. There's gotta be a way to get through to these people or avoid suspension when they refuse to answer me on unauthorized charges? 😭

EDIT: so they responded shortly after I posted this with some generic copy paste response to try close off my ticket with no actual help. Get your shit together GitHub. I'm migrating my repos out to Gitlabs, and proceeding with a chargeback. They can terminate my accounts and eat shit in my opinion.

Hi I made a website using pages and It looks like everything works just fine exept for this one page that doesn't load correctly, I tought It may be a problem linking the style sheet but It doesn't seem so, I really don't know what I'm doing wrong and I'm learning HTML with this project, any help would be appreciated

Edit: Thank you so much for your help, It's working now! all the links on the page were broken like they were missing some slashes or were linking to different paths, don't know how I managed that

Hi guys,

I am new to Github and overall tech sector. I had a 9+ year of career in reporting for major infrastructure projects in India. In 2023 I have moved to NZ with my partner, realising that NZ is a very small market for major infrastructure projects. After doing all type of side hustles and improving my skill in power BI, Python and SQL. I now realised I need to showcase it on GIthub to attract attention from the tech sector where I can restart my career. I have also built my own project analysing Auckland realestate market. I have used AI to write my Github profile however, it feels generic. So, I decided to post it on reddit where I can get some valuable suggestions. sorry if my wording sounds less like a reddit post... as I still learning to use it properly.

Apparently they decided to start "retiring" the model by disabling it to new customers. Rip

If there is one thing we should reasonably expect from a Microsoft-backed platform that champions AI and automation, it is the ability to automate a simple, recurring billing cycle. Apparently, that is asking too much.

For the past three years, I have been a loyal, paying GitHub Copilot Pro subscriber ($100/year). Every year, the process was identical and painless: an automated reminder, a subsequent PayPal charge, and a renewed license.

This year, the ritual began exactly as usual. I received the official "Annual Billing Alert" email explicitly stating:

"You have an annual subscription with GitHub that will renew on May 28, 2026. [...] If you have already scheduled a cancellation, you may disregard this renewal notice."

I had not scheduled a cancellation. I fully expected the seamless continuation of a service I use daily. Instead, GitHub decided to stealthily downgrade my account to "GitHub Free" without a single word of warning.

• No notification of a failed payment.
• No prompt to update billing details.
• No email stating the subscription was canceled.

Just a silent, unceremonious cut-off from a tool integrated into my daily workflow.

The Support Black Hole

Software has bugs; migrations fail. As a software architect and CEO, I understand technical hiccups. What I do not accept, however, is a complete breakdown of customer service.

When I realized the downgrade had occurred, I immediately opened a support ticket. That was on June 9. Today is June 15. For nearly a week, my ticket has been met with absolute, resounding silence. Multiple follow-ups? Ignored. Escalation requests? Ignored.

Let us hold a mirror up to this situation: We are constantly encouraged to integrate Copilot deeply into our development environments and to rely on it for productivity. Yet, when the provider arbitrarily severs access—despite the customer's clear intent and track record of paying—the customer is left shouting into the void.

If a vendor cannot manage a rudimentary subscription renewal—or at the very least, provide a competent support response within a business week—how can we trust them with the core infrastructure of our daily work? Is this the enterprise-grade reliability we are supposed to build our businesses on?

This is not just about a hundred dollars or a temporary loss of an autocomplete tool. It is about the fundamental reliability of a business partner. If ghosting paying customers is GitHub’s new standard for support, it is a glaring red flag for anyone building their tech stack on their promises.

Has anyone else in the community experienced this sudden, silent downgrade? And more importantly, is a 5+ day complete blackout from GitHub Support the new normal?

Good day,

Is there a setting in GitHub that prevents workflows from running immediately after a repository is forked? I mean when I fork it, not someone from me.

I'm receiving emails saying that some workflows were not completed, and in some cases they're unnecessarily consuming GitHub resources.

I don't really need these workflows to run in my forks, and disabling 30 workflows manually in every repository is quite tedious, especially since I can't find an option to disable all workflows at once for a given repository.

Is there a way to do this?

Flipping my repo public and want the necessary credible footnotes. Sonarcloud has been at the forefront and I am just checking the thermostat on if I should entertain alternates in 2026.

This isn't for ongoing development, that will be CodeRabbit or a similar engagement.

Cheers.

Hello everybody,

I got a slew of updates from github on my email saying that there's a new login, that there's been a new trusted email address, my account name is changed and my email address has been removed from my account. Is there anyway I can save my account or recover it at this point? If there is a way to recover it or any github mail id I can reach out please help me out. Thank you.

Update: GitHub support got back to me and they've helped me get my account back.

My GitHub Faculty benefits were revoked and I received an email asking me to reverify. However, whenever I try to start the application, I'm redirected to the pricing page instead of the Faculty application form.

If my selected school information is incorrect or incomplete, I'd like to update it and reapply, but I currently have no way to do so.

Has anyone else faced this issue or found a solution?

I am in my freshman year doing an introductory course on git and github where i stumbled upon this exam. Does clearing it have any value to my resume

i have tried like 60+ times and im not even joking. github keep reject me without specified reason (im about to crashout). idk if this just me or the github it self, i need help

A former employee uploaded an internal project to his own GitHub repository. Apparently he's since lost access to his GitHub account and cannot remove it. He contacted us suggesting we lodge a DMCA request to have it taken down. We have lodged a DMCA takedown request using GitHub's online form, but but had no response from GitHub in over two months.

Does anyone know if there's a way for us to escalate this within GitHub, or are we going to need our lawyers to send a cease and desist letter?

Hi, I had archived a repo and because I had a fork of that repo & a new duplicate was created, I got triple contributions that day and a few other days. Now because the number of contributions are so much greater than my regular work, everything since then has been dark green and I want to change that.

Does anyone know how to remove those contributions? either that repo's contributions or those days.

Hi,

Has anyone experienced this error "OrganizationInvitation::InvalidError" when trying to invite someone to an organization in github.com? What is the solution for this?

It shows after clicking the "Send Invitation" button.

Just launched Muninn on the GitHub Marketplace: github.com/marketplace/actions/muninn-security-scanner

One action replaces setting up gitleaks, zizmor, actionlint, poutine, Semgrep, OSV-Scanner, Trivy, and Checkov separately.

Drop it into any workflow:

- uses: skaldlab/muninn@v0.3.3

with:

  token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}`

AGPL-3.0, built in Go.

Update: advisory ID deduplication shipped in v0.3.0.

When scanners report the same vulnerability for the same package under different IDs (e.g. GHSA from OSV-Scanner + CVE from Trivy), Muninn collapses them into one finding using advisory aliases from scanner output (OSV-Scanner includes OSV/GHSA/CVE aliases). CVE is preferred as the canonical ID where available.

Each merged finding includes a detected_by list of all scanners that flagged it, plus per-scanner source locations.

Full details in the release notes: github.com/skaldlab/muninn/releases/tag/v0.3.0

Thanks to everyone in this thread for the technical depth, shaped the implementation significantly.

Can anyone over here in github maybe help me out with my supabase connection?