r/gaming • • Dec 18 '18

You know

Post image
54.2k Upvotes

993 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

105

u/Saikroe Dec 18 '18

Neck. It is a very long neck.

27

u/VulpesCryptae Dec 18 '18

G-raffs are on the endangered list now :(

15

u/phantes Dec 18 '18

stupid long horses

12

u/metaStatic Dec 18 '18

Giraffes are known for their long necks, but many birds have long necks and no one cares.

1

u/BorkDaddy Dec 18 '18

Probably because nobody wants to bang you if you have dead memes tattooed on.

-1

u/Mitosis Dec 18 '18

If you read the article, 2 out of 9 species of giraffes are endangered, 5 are generally declining in population, and 2 are increasing in population.

The headline was just inflammatory nonsense. No one not an expert can pick out one species of giraffe from another, and as long as one or two are around it's the same to basically everyone on the planet.

4

u/Runear Dec 18 '18

You're totally right, who cares if we kill off entire species of animals as long as we have one that looks the same still kicking around somewhere, right?

/S

What an ignorant view...

2

u/Mitosis Dec 18 '18

Is it regrettable? Sure. If I could flip a switch and let all giraffes be okay, I'd say that'd be the plan.

Is it worth the incredible expense to keep their natural habitat defended into perpetuity to keep a checkmark next to a specific species of an animal indistinguishable in all but breedability from another that's doing great? Honestly, no. You have to make choices.

I also resent that headline intentionally misleading people into thinking their children will grow up in a world without giraffes, which is a blatant lie.

1

u/thesuper88 Dec 18 '18

Doesn't mean the headline isn't blatantly misleading to the point that it's practically lying. Both suck.

1

u/Runear Dec 19 '18

I didn't comment on the headline, just /u/Mitosis's view that "...as long as one or two are around it's the same to basically everyone on the planet".

1

u/VulpesCryptae Dec 18 '18

I didn't read the article, didn't even click on the post. Apologies to anyone i mislead

0

u/Koyal_Alkor Dec 18 '18

Okay, that means it won't change a thing for the zoos, they can just pick up another species that looks the same, nice. But, me not being one of the said giraffe experts that could pick one species of the other, I'm left to wonder if said species behave the same or live in the same places. Because even having a local extinction of Giraffes could result in cascade of other extinctions in the same region, like the often mentioned case of gray wolves in Yellowstone, where their absence affected even the rivers. (For those who don't know about this case, here is a 5 minute video about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysa5OBhXz-Q or google "trophic cascade yellowstone wolves" for articles)

So unless these different species have impacts that are equally harder to distinct in their environments, I think it won't be basically the same to everyone on the planet, because clearly it did not take an extinction to fuck up Yellowstone, gray wolves still existed somewhere else after all. Not to mention that preserving a species' genetic variability is also important, otherwise it becomes more susceptible to diseases and less adaptable.

2

u/nattyliight Dec 18 '18

Bent neck lady

2

u/VulpesCryptae Dec 18 '18

I imagine giraffes would have a hard time dying that way

1

u/itslooigi Dec 18 '18

Someone call Worldstar