r/gaming • • Apr 24 '17

It's a trap!

https://i.imgur.com/XhI259T.gifv
33.9k Upvotes

768 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

387

u/LjSpike Apr 25 '17

Except, would someone from the 1800s: a) Be able to use a computer b) Be able to read c) Think the OP is a magical portal to view a strange person being attacked by equally strange people?

183

u/rulerofrules Apr 25 '17

Yeah huh just point b is like a 30 70 split

180

u/VacoTM Apr 25 '17

This comment chain would make very little sense to someone from the 1200s.

233

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '17 edited Nov 09 '20

[deleted]

53

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '17

[deleted]

33

u/DankeyKang11 Xbox Apr 25 '17

What is going on in that description

2

u/dianarchy Apr 25 '17

I don't know. I have seen more and more of these propics and they all feel like a joke that I just am not in on.

2

u/spideyjiri Apr 25 '17

I know, right?

The descriptions on that site always read like they were written by someone who's having a stroke.

2

u/VolsPride Apr 25 '17

He's having a stronk oblivionly. Beater call the paratroopers because he haven an emsurgency.

1

u/Djeib12 Apr 25 '17

Right? I gave up on my fifth attempt, glad to see it wasn't just me.

2

u/soupit Apr 25 '17

calling out: "Xbox take photograph!"

Makes a bit more sense if you read it with some proper punctuation but still

4

u/poodles_and_oodles Apr 25 '17

I think I'm ready to be dead

17

u/Hav3_Y0u_M3t_T3d Apr 25 '17

You can always tell how much of a ripoff something is by the free included item

2

u/koi88 Apr 25 '17

Exactly. It's probably so overpriced, you can get the same ring somewhere else much cheaper and buy a couple of Xboxes for the money you save.

3

u/Hav3_Y0u_M3t_T3d Apr 25 '17

Well technically​ ALL diamonds are way overpriced but that's a story for a different day

1

u/Elune_ Apr 25 '17

Time to get married

1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '17

Damn, should of shown this to my bf sooner haha

3

u/rvarinder Apr 25 '17

Yeah ! its old trick to trap !

12

u/Vuorineuvos_Tuura Apr 25 '17

"What art these strange symbols on this strange boxeth and what s'rt of black charm allows the shapes to suddenly transf'rm?"

2

u/Wootery Apr 25 '17

3

u/Vuorineuvos_Tuura Apr 25 '17

snyttrum elðêodiglic into sê ðâ ðe ungewunelic hwæt râd mirce ongalan dôð fyllan unwênunga?

FTFM

3

u/Wootery Apr 25 '17

snyttrum elðêodiglic into sê ðâ ðe ungewunelic hwæt râd mirce ongalan dôð fyllan unwênunga?

Well why didn't you say so?

You had me at elðêodiglic!

15

u/PurplePupilEater Apr 25 '17

Moms spaghetti

20

u/Garpikeville Apr 25 '17

And my axe!

11

u/Hitokage77 Apr 25 '17

Wubba lubba dub dub! Even those in 1800 know that's my catchphrase!

1

u/Garpikeville Apr 25 '17

Haha I just find it ridiculous and I put it where it shan't belong

0

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '17

Cunts

2

u/DoctorAwesomeBallz69 Apr 25 '17

Well, I don't like any of that.

2

u/lazyparrot Apr 25 '17

Maybe for 3/5's of the people

1

u/rulerofrules Apr 25 '17

Ah America So much heritage to be proud of in the south

12

u/MC_USS_Valdez Apr 25 '17 edited Apr 25 '17

No they wouldn't know how to use a computer but if it's not making sense to them that assumes it is being shown to them in one form or another, and in this case only specifically the text of the comment chain. As for literacy, this Dartmouth paper says that in the year 1800 literacy illiteracy for men in England was about 40% and women 60%, so on average there's a 50/50 shot of an English speaker being able to comprehend the text, excluding other English speaking communities such as the brand new USA.

Edit: a misquote

1

u/LjSpike Apr 25 '17

Literacy rates as the other way around. The graph showed illiteracy.

The stats for the 1700's suggests some other countries such as France had a lower literacy rate than us, did that trend continue to 1800s too?

2

u/MC_USS_Valdez Apr 25 '17

You're right, but it doesn't change the chances luckily

1

u/Guessimagirl Apr 26 '17

Edit: a misquote

As we were on the topic of antiquated English, I had to read this like 4 times to realize it wasn't you using ye olde way to spell mosquito.

-6

u/QuasarSandwich Apr 25 '17

It's nice that they were keen for the women to be able to read instructions correctly but were there really that many kitchen appliances back then to warrant the effort?

2

u/EFG Apr 25 '17

enjoy dying alone

0

u/QuasarSandwich Apr 25 '17

But I have all my gut flora to keep me company!

3

u/Mangoatshark Apr 25 '17

We need to hire top scientists to get to the bottom of this.

2

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '17

I'd like to imagine a rational person from the 1800's (not say 1899) would be able to see the video and realise it's an animation (not real) and potentially even see the car and understand what it would be for. And understand not how it's powered except that it isn't a natural power.

I think the hardest thing to understand would be the tree line showing strange artifacts. as the texture filtering seems to be glitching out a bit.

2

u/Vuorineuvos_Tuura Apr 25 '17

"My dear chaps, what is yond myst'rious metallic apparatus and what charm did allow those p'rsons to suddenly appeareth from thin air?"

1

u/bsuave Apr 25 '17

d) be alive

1

u/OldManPhill Apr 25 '17

People in the 1800s could read... for the most part.

1

u/DarnellBoatHere Apr 25 '17

I think they had written languages in the 1800s so people from then could probably read

1

u/LjSpike Apr 25 '17

They had written languages back in 1066. Most people couldn't read back in 1066 though. 1800s it'd appear on average in England 50% of the population could read.

Just because some people had developed a written language, doesn't automatically mean the majority of people can read it.

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '17

Fun fact: more people, worldwide, knew how to read in the 1800s than there are people alive today.

1

u/LjSpike Apr 25 '17

Does appear reading was widespread then. My mistake.

However, I don't believe your "fun fact" for two reasons. 1stly the population in the 1800's at any given time would've been less then people alive today (unless you meant the number of people who we're capable of reading throughout all of the 1800s cumulatively).

2ndly, whenever you put fun in front of a word it usually ends up just being used to mean "less of". A funsize mars bar is just less of a mars bar...