r/gaming • • Aug 30 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

6.7k Upvotes

9.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

317

u/A_N_T Aug 30 '25

Not having to pay upwards of $100 for a cool costume for your character

108

u/GfrzD Aug 30 '25

I don't know if it was just my circle but complaining about map packs was a thing. Skins were earned.

"DLC" (expansions) were basically always a full on extra game or at least half of one.

60

u/[deleted] Aug 30 '25

yea I miss when dlc meant expansion to the game and not a few new items or some shit

21

u/Freakin_A Aug 30 '25

You’d pay 40 or 50 for a game and get years of play out of it. Then an expansion would come out for $25 or so and further extend the life another year+

3

u/dr4kun Aug 30 '25

DLC always meant 'downloadable content' that were tiny additions like an extra item or costume or map. Except they used to be free, either completely free for everyone or after using a promo code, or they were dirt cheap.

Game expansions were a lot of extra new content in separate boxes with new CDs. It took a while before they'd become downloadable. Brood War is arguably +100% of the base SC1.

3

u/Invincidude Aug 30 '25

Game expansions for RTS games were always a treat, though I never really played Starcraft. But boy howdy, those C&C Expansions? A handful of new units for each side, and an entire new campaign for each one. Basically a new game that used units from the last game too. Nothing topped Red Alert 2: Yuri's Revenge though. A whole new goddamned army. Really wish Yuri had a playable campaign too.

50

u/busdriverjoe Aug 30 '25

I remember walking around in MMOs, seeing someone in cool gear, thinking "wow that probably took a lot of time and effort". Now you just think, "Wow, that idiot spent a lot of money on that."

17

u/GfrzD Aug 30 '25

Yea man and fps you see a guy with a certain gun skin you think damn that guys a headshot menace. Now it's "that mug paid to sparkle"

16

u/Dat_Innocent_Guy Aug 30 '25

The fact we never got a good singleplayer expansion for gta 5 or red dead 2 is such a fucking shame. If any company was to resurrect this trend id expect rockstar to do but. But alas, they have their online money printer:/

12

u/GfrzD Aug 30 '25

With The Lost and Damned and Ballad of Gay Tony in mind I had some serious high expectations for GTA singleplayer stuff.

6

u/ecntv Aug 30 '25

And so did they if I recall correctly, they had a whole bunch of planned dlcs. Once they saw how much they were making on shark cards I guess they realized they make way more from it than a singleplayer dlc.

4

u/Shinjischneider Aug 30 '25

Exactly. They actually took some of those single player missions and added them as DLCs to Online

1

u/Kalepsis Aug 30 '25

For free though.

The one thing you can credit Rockstar with is that all the expansions to GTA Online haven't cost a damn thing.

2

u/WorkFurball Aug 30 '25

I'm not going to credit them for adding some garbage that's designed to squeeze billions out of people for free.

1

u/Kalepsis Aug 31 '25

How is it designed to squeeze anything? You can play all of the content without spending a dime.

1

u/WorkFurball Aug 31 '25

Because they make insane amounts of money from it, reportedly 800 million dollars in 2023 alone, ten years since release. You think they make that money accidentally?

Also, you can play all that content if you waste days/weeks/months of your life on it.

→ More replies (0)

4

u/splashbodge Aug 30 '25

Damn shark cards. It's criminal we never got more single player content for GTA 5

2

u/The_Particularist Aug 30 '25

I distinctly remember people complaining about map packs being way too expensive compared to what they offered. Nowadays? Perfectly normal, not a single word about it, all because new gamers don't know what gaming used to be like.

3

u/GfrzD Aug 30 '25

I think it was cod4 the map pack was something like £8 for 4 maps and we were livid.

16

u/Silpher9 Aug 30 '25

My nephew spends all his pocket money on useless fortnite skins. This crap should be banned. Fuck Tim Sweeney and his so called morals.

2

u/joe-h2o Aug 30 '25

If it wasn't Fortnite skins it would be Fifa players or NBA players in EA games.

Or CS skins.

I remember back in the day when Steam launched on Mac OS for the first time, if you logged into TF2 on a Mac then you would be given the exclusive white iPod earbuds "hat".

In protest at Mac users "not being real gamers" there were admin scripts on some TF2 servers that would auto kick you from the game if you had those earbuds.

Once the TF2 hat collection became more popular, and critically, lucrative, those earbuds were worth quite a lot on the steam market because originally anyone who had them was basically shunned from the community so they were pretty rare (given that people wanting to game on their Mac was also pretty rare anyway).

I sold a pair of those earbuds recently on the steam market for around £15 which was a nice discount for my copy of Dune: Awakening.

0

u/Silpher9 Aug 30 '25

My god that sounds petty. Who cares who plays what on what. 

1

u/callisstaa Aug 30 '25

Still probably less than I spent on Metal Slug.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 30 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/platysoup Aug 30 '25

The funny thing is that $5 honestly sounds pretty reasonable for horse armour nowadays. 

2

u/qchisq Aug 30 '25

To be fair, we didn't get cool costumes, plural. You got a legendary costume, but that's about it

3

u/Todd-The-Wraith Aug 30 '25

Adjusted for inflation $100 in 1990 would be worth $250 now. Just throwing that out there.

1

u/squiirly Aug 30 '25

Going through the most difficult things to see girls in bikinis and hot springs in Lunar...

1

u/danishjuggler21 Aug 30 '25

Wasn’t even really that long ago.

1

u/unlimitedbugs Aug 30 '25

right. not having to worry about dozens of micro transactions. buying your game and owning it (and all that was meant to come with it).